Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 1.15.0 and 0.31.0, Axios does not correctly handle hostname normalization when checking NO_PROXY rules. Requests to loopback addresses like localhost. (with a trailing dot) or [::1] (IPv6 literal) skip NO_PROXY matching and go through the configured proxy. This goes against what developers expect and lets attackers force requests through a proxy, even if NO_PROXY is set up to protect loopback or internal services. This issue leads to the possibility of proxy bypass and SSRF vulnerabilities allowing attackers to reach sensitive loopback or internal services despite the configured protections. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.0 and 0.31.0.
CVE-2025-62718
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.9 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 1.2% (67th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory CVSS 4.8 is lower than this score; a lower GitHub score revises it only when its advisory is newer than the CVE record's last change, and this advisory (published 2026-04-09) is not newer than that change (2026-10-14), so it does not.
Also known asEUVD-2025-209381 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.9
- EG Score
- 9.9CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 76EG Risk 76/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity99% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 1.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 67th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.9 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 1.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
April 9, 2026
Last Modified
October 14, 2026
Advisory Details (10)
Auto-updated Oct 30, 2026NO_PROXY Hostname Normalization Bypass Leads to SSRF · Advisory · axios/axios · GitHub
https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5v1.15.0
Patch available: axios/axios v1.15.0
https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v1.15.0v0.31.0
Patch available: axios/axios v0.31.0
https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v0.31.0fix: backport the fixes from the v1 branch
Patch available: axios/axios v0.31.0 (PR #10688 merged 2026-04-11)
https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10688fix: no_proxy hostname normalization bypass leads to ssrf
Patch available: axios/axios v1.15.0 (PR #10661 merged 2026-04-06)
https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10661commit fb3befb6daac (axios/axios)
Patch available: axios/axios v1.15.0 (contains commit fb3befb6daac)
https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/fb3befb6daac6cad26b2e54094d0f2d9e47f24dfcommit 03cdfc99e8db (axios/axios)
Patch available: axios/axios v0.31.0 (contains commit 03cdfc99e8db)
https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/03cdfc99e8db32a390e12128208b6778492cee9cRFC 3986 - Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3986#section-3.2.2RFC 1034 - Domain names - concepts and facilities
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1034#section-3.1Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-62718(20)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:90321Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.31.0 Release.
- RHSA-2026:86618Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: New container image: rhceph-9.2
- RHSA-2026:59155Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 Container Release Update
- RHSA-2026:41928Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers
- RHSA-2026:36882Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes v2.14.3 security update
- RHSA-2026:26010Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0
- RHSA-2026:24977Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 2.25.7 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- RHSA-2026:24866Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 Container Release Update
- +12 more
Patch Availability(32)
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-axios | 0.21.1+dfsg-1 ... 1.8.4+dfsg-1 (41 versions) |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-axios | 1.11.0+dfsg-1 ... 1.8.4+dfsg-1 (22 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-axios | 1.11.0+dfsg-1 ... 1.8.4+dfsg-1 (12 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-axios | 1.11.0+dfsg-1 ... 1.8.4+dfsg-1 (6 versions) |
| — |
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| axios | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(9)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
- Red HatRHSA-2026:10175IMPORTANT2026-04-09
RHSA-2026:10175 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:13571IMPORTANT2026-04-09
RHSA-2026:13571 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:13826IMPORTANT2026-04-09
RHSA-2026:13826 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:14937IMPORTANT2026-04-09
RHSA-2026:14937 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:16874IMPORTANT2026-04-09
RHSA-2026:16874 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:17657IMPORTANT2026-04-09
RHSA-2026:17657 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:17699IMPORTANT2026-04-09
RHSA-2026:17699 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:19375IMPORTANT2026-04-09
RHSA-2026:19375 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:19712IMPORTANT2026-04-09
RHSA-2026:19712 — Important
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 81× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 98 of 386 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 288 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-11-01 15:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-01 15:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 4.8
- 2026-11-01 08:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 4.8
- 2026-11-01 08:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 17:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 17:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-30 19:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 19:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-29 21:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 21:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-28 23:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 23:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-28 01:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 01:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-27 02:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 02:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-26 00:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 00:42 UTCVendor advisory
Show 73 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 02:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 02:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-24 04:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 04:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-23 06:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 06:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-22 08:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 08:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-21 10:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 10:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-20 11:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 19:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 19:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-18 20:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 20:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-18 05:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 22:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 22:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-17 00:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 00:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-16 00:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 00:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-14 17:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 17:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-14 03:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 03:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-12 23:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 16:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-12 10:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 20:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-09-29 19:32 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 65th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 65th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 65th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 65th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 65th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:11:node-axios
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:13826 · redhat:RHSA-2026:14937 · redhat:RHSA-2026:10175
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-1289 · CWE-441 · CWE-918
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2025-62718?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-62718 published?
Is CVE-2025-62718 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-62718?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-62718?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-62718
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-62718?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.