CVE-2026-42044

CRITICALNVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.1 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (49th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory CVSS 6.5 is lower than this score; a lower GitHub score revises it only when its advisory is newer than the CVE record's last change, and this advisory (published 2026-05-05) is not newer than that change (2026-09-10), so it does not.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-25609 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-3w6x-2g7m-8v23 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. From 1.0.0 to before 1.15.2, he Axios library is vulnerable to a Prototype Pollution "Gadget" attack that allows any Object.prototype pollution in the application's dependency tree to be escalated into surgical, invisible modification of all JSON API responses — including privilege escalation, balance manipulation, and authorization bypass. The default transformResponse function at lib/defaults/index.js:124 calls JSON.parse(data, this.parseReviver), where this is the merged config object. Because parseReviver is not present in Axios defaults, not validated by assertOptions, and not subject to any constraints, a polluted Object.prototype.parseReviver function is called for every key-value pair in every JSON response, allowing the attacker to selectively modify individual values while leaving the rest of the response intact. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.2.

CVSS v3
9.1
EG Score
9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
57
EG Risk 57/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity91% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
49th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.1 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

April 24, 2026

Last Modified

September 10, 2026

Advisory Details (10)

Auto-updated Sep 15, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, redhat.
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20338
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19375
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19109
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17699
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17657
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16542
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16535
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16534
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16532
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Invisible JSON Response Tampering via Prototype Pollution Gadget in `parseReviver` · Advisory · axios/axios · GitHub

Affected: 1.15.0)

https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-3w6x-2g7m-8v23

Patch Availability(30)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhceph/rhceph-9-rhel10:17908435272026-10-21redhat
redhatmta/mta-ui-rhel9:17851690132026-08-04redhat
redhatautomation-gateway-0:2.5.20260715-1.el9ap2026-07-20redhat
redhatquay/quay-rhel9:17839558462026-07-16redhat
redhatrhacm2/console-rhel9:17834517292026-07-08redhat
redhatcontainer-native-virtualization/kubevirt-console-plugin-rhel9:17829179832026-07-07redhat
redhataxios2026-07-02redhat
redhatrhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:17827612442026-06-30redhat
redhatsatellite/iop-host-inventory-frontend-rhel9:17801051792026-06-16redhat
redhatsatellite/iop-vulnerability-frontend-rhel9:17810324952026-06-16redhat
redhatrhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:17811873422026-06-16redhat
redhatsatellite/iop-advisor-frontend-rhel9:17811816732026-06-16redhat
redhatdiscovery/discovery-ui-rhel9:17793951882026-06-15redhat
redhatrhacm2/console-rhel9:17806008232026-06-11redhat
redhatmulticluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:17809108882026-06-11redhat
redhatrhmtc/openshift-migration-ui-rhel8:17805907172026-06-10redhat
redhatquay/quay-rhel8:17808913952026-06-09redhat
redhatrhacm2/console-rhel9:17808767342026-06-08redhat
redhatmulticluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:17809175312026-06-08redhat
redhatnetwork-observability/network-observability-console-plugin-rhel9:17805560692026-06-08redhat
redhatrhtas/rhtas-console-ui-rhel9:17799715062026-06-08redhat
redhatquay/quay-rhel8:17798114732026-06-04redhat
redhatquay/quay-rhel8:17798222612026-06-03redhat
redhatquay/quay-rhel8:17798114122026-06-02redhat
redhatquay/quay-rhel9:17799222052026-06-02redhat
redhatdevspaces/dashboard-rhel9:17793412892026-05-28redhat
redhatrhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:17798415862026-05-27redhat
redhatadvanced-cluster-security/rhacs-main-rhel8:17793715942026-05-26redhat
redhatquay/quay-rhel8:17796893922026-05-26redhat
npmaxios @ 1.15.2 (fixes >= 1.0.0, < 1.15.2)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-axios0.21.1+dfsg-1 ... 1.8.4+dfsg-1 (40 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-axios1.11.0+dfsg-1 ... 1.8.4+dfsg-1 (22 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-axios1.11.0+dfsg-1 ... 1.8.4+dfsg-1 (12 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-axios1.11.0+dfsg-1 ... 1.8.4+dfsg-1 (7 versions)
  • every version up to 1.15.2-1: fixed in 1.15.2-1
—
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
axios—
  • 1.0.0 up to 1.15.2: fixed in 1.15.2
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(20)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 24× in last 7d / 76× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 352 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 252 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 04:54 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 04:54 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 04:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3w6x-2g7m-8v23 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  4. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  5. 2026-11-01 07:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3w6x-2g7m-8v23 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  6. 2026-11-01 07:50 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-11-01 02:52 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-11-01 02:52 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  10. 2026-10-31 00:50 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-31 00:50 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  13. 2026-10-29 22:48 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-29 22:48 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  16. 2026-10-28 20:47 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-28 20:47 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  19. 2026-10-27 18:42 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-27 18:42 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  22. 2026-10-26 16:38 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-26 16:38 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  25. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-25 14:22 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-25 14:22 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  4. 2026-10-24 12:20 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-24 12:20 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  7. 2026-10-23 10:18 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-23 10:18 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  10. 2026-10-22 08:15 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-22 08:15 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  13. 2026-10-21 06:12 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-21 06:12 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  16. 2026-10-20 04:10 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-20 04:10 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  19. 2026-10-19 02:04 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-19 02:04 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 03:41 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-18 00:00 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-18 00:00 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  26. 2026-10-16 21:58 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-16 21:58 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  29. 2026-10-15 18:20 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-15 18:20 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  32. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  33. 2026-10-14 12:05 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-14 12:05 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  36. 2026-10-13 10:02 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-13 10:02 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  39. 2026-10-12 16:07 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-12 08:00 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-11 19:49 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-10-11 17:03 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-10-11 14:29 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  45. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  46. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  47. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  48. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  49. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  50. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  51. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  52. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  53. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  54. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  55. 2026-09-29 20:02 UTCOSV refresh
  56. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  57. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  58. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  59. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  60. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  61. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  62. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  63. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  64. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  65. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  66. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  67. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  68. 2026-09-10 13:40 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-09-10 12:28 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-09-10 12:28 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  72. 2026-09-09 12:40 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-09-09 12:40 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  75. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-42044?
CVE-2026-42044 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on April 24, 2026. Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. From 1.0.0 to before 1.15.2, he Axios library is vulnerable to a Prototype Pollution "Gadget" attack that allows any Object.prototype pollution in the application's dependency tree to be escalated into surgical, invisible…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-42044 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-42044 was published on April 24, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 10, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-42044 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-42044 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (49th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-42044?
CVE-2026-42044 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-42044?
A fix for CVE-2026-42044 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-42044 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-42044

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-42044?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.