Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to 3.7.3, there is a critical vulnerability in Traefik's HTTP/3 (QUIC) TLS configuration selection that allows unauthenticated clients to bypass router-specific mTLS enforcement. When HTTP/3 is enabled on an entrypoint, the TLS handshake selects the applicable TLS configuration through an exact, case-sensitive lookup on the SNI value, which fails to match wildcard host patterns (e.g., *.example.com) or case variants of the configured hostname. Because the handshake falls back to the default TLS configuration — which may not require client certificates — a client can complete the QUIC handshake without presenting a certificate, while the subsequent HTTP routing layer still dispatches the request to a backend protected by a router-specific mTLS policy. The issue affects deployments where HTTP/3 is enabled, a router uses a wildcard Host rule or case-insensitive hostname matching, a router-specific TLSOptions enforces client certificate authentication, and UDP access to the entrypoint is reachable by an attacker. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.7.3.
CVE-2026-53622
This critical-severity CVE scores 10.0 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 85% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 10.0
- EG Score
- 10.0(medium)
- EPSS
- 15.2%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
June 16, 2026
Last Modified
July 15, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Jul 22, 20262491924 – (CVE-2026-53622) CVE-2026-53622 github.com/traefik/traefik: Traefik: mTLS enforcement bypass due to HTTP/3 TLS configuration flaw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2491924HTTP/3 mTLS bypass via exact SNI TLSOptions lookup for wildcard and mixed-case hosts · Advisory · traefik/traefik · GitHub
https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-9cr8-q42q-g8m7v3.7.3
Patch available: traefik/traefik v3.7.3
https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.3Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53622(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(3 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(3)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/traefik/traefik | — | — | — |
| github.com/traefik/traefik/v2 | — | — | — |
| Traefik | — | 3.7.3 | — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 07:00 UTCEG score recompute▲ 0.90
- 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 01:24 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 10
- 2026-07-15 01:14 UTCEG score recompute▼ 0.90
- 2026-07-15 00:50 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 9.1
- 2026-07-13 22:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 26 moreShow fewer
- 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-05 02:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-27 05:33 UTCEG score recompute▲ 2.20
- 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-26 17:41 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 10 · severity → CRITICAL
- 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-24 12:03 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.80
- 2026-06-24 12:01 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 7.8 · CVSS v4 → 7.8
- 2026-06-16 21:06 UTCEG score recompute
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-53622?
When was CVE-2026-53622 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-53622 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53622?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53622?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53622
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53622?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.