CVE-2026-53622

CRITICALNVD 10.010.0
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 10.0 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-06-16. NVD baseline CVSS 10.0; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-38576 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-9cr8-q42q-g8m7 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

10.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 10.0Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Versions prior to 3.7.3, 3.6.18, and 2.11.51 have a critical vulnerability in Traefik's HTTP/3 (QUIC) TLS configuration selection that allows unauthenticated clients to bypass router-specific mTLS enforcement. When HTTP/3 is enabled on an entrypoint, the TLS handshake selects the applicable TLS configuration through an exact, case-sensitive lookup on the SNI value, which fails to match wildcard host patterns (e.g., *.example.com) or case variants of the configured hostname. Because the handshake falls back to the default TLS configuration — which may not require client certificates — a client can complete the QUIC handshake without presenting a certificate, while the subsequent HTTP routing layer still dispatches the request to a backend protected by a router-specific mTLS policy. The issue affects deployments where HTTP/3 is enabled, a router uses a wildcard Host rule or case-insensitive hostname matching, a router-specific TLSOptions enforces client certificate authentication, and UDP access to the entrypoint is reachable by an attacker. This vulnerability is fixed in versions 3.7.3, 3.6.18, and 2.11.51.

CVSS v3
10.0
EG Score
10.0CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
60
EG Risk 60/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity100% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
50th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
10.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 16, 2026

Last Modified

September 2, 2026

Advisory Details (9)

Auto-updated Oct 30, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: redhat, github_pr, github_release, github.
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

CVE-2026-53622 - Red Hat Customer Portal

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53622
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:62260
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)🟡 PoC Available

HTTP/3 mTLS bypass via exact SNI TLSOptions lookup for wildcard and mixed-case hosts · Advisory · traefik/traefik · GitHub

Affected: v2.11.48.

https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-9cr8-q42q-g8m7
GitHub release Patch Available

v3.7.3

Patch available: traefik/traefik v3.7.3

https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.3
GitHub pull request

Move snicheck to ctx instead of simulated routing

Fix merged in traefik/traefik PR #13214 on 2026-05-28 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/traefik/traefik/pull/13214
Web page

Comparing v3.6.17...v3.6.18 · traefik/traefik · GitHub

https://github.com/traefik/traefik/compare/v3.6.17...v3.6.18
Web page

New Security Update for Traefik 2.11 (2.11.48), 3.6 (3.6.19) and 3.7 (3.7.3) - Announcements - Traefik Labs Community Forum

https://community.traefik.io/t/new-security-update-for-traefik-2-11-2-11-48-3-6-3-6-19-and-3-7-3-7-3/29917
Red Hat

2491924 – (CVE-2026-53622) CVE-2026-53622 github.com/traefik/traefik: Traefik: mTLS enforcement bypass due to HTTP/3 TLS configuration flaw

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2491924

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53622(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(5)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatdevspaces/traefik-rhel9:17877567992026-09-01redhat
gogithub.com/traefik/traefik—ghsa
gogithub.com/traefik/traefik/v2 @ 2.11.51 (fixes <= 2.11.50)—ghsa
gogithub.com/traefik/traefik/v3 @ 3.7.3 (fixes >= 3.7.0, <= 3.7.2)—ghsa
gogithub.com/traefik/traefik/v3 @ 3.6.18 (fixes <= 3.6.17)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(4)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/traefik/traefik—
  • every version through 1.7.34: no fix on record
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
github.com/traefik/traefik/v2—
  • every version up to 2.11.51: fixed in 2.11.51
—
github.com/traefik/traefik/v3—
  • 3.7.0 up to 3.7.3: fixed in 3.7.3
  • every version up to 3.6.18: fixed in 3.6.18
  • every version up to 3.7.3: fixed in 3.7.3
—
Traefik—
  • every version up to 3.7.3: fixed in 3.7.3
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 77× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 219 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 119 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 15:44 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-01 15:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9cr8-q42q-g8m7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  4. 2026-11-01 07:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9cr8-q42q-g8m7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  5. 2026-11-01 07:45 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  7. 2026-10-31 13:56 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-31 13:56 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  10. 2026-10-30 12:07 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-30 12:07 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  13. 2026-10-29 10:19 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-29 10:19 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  16. 2026-10-28 08:32 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-28 08:32 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  19. 2026-10-27 06:23 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-27 06:23 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  22. 2026-10-26 00:36 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-26 00:36 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  25. 2026-10-25 14:20 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-24 22:44 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-24 22:44 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  4. 2026-10-23 20:57 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-23 20:57 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  7. 2026-10-22 19:09 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-22 19:09 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  10. 2026-10-21 17:19 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-21 17:19 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  13. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  14. 2026-10-20 15:24 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-20 15:24 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  17. 2026-10-19 13:34 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-19 13:34 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 11:45 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-18 03:31 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  23. 2026-10-17 09:56 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 09:56 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  26. 2026-10-16 08:07 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-16 08:07 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  29. 2026-10-15 06:18 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-15 06:18 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  32. 2026-10-14 01:59 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-14 01:59 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  35. 2026-10-12 22:16 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-10-12 22:16 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  38. 2026-10-12 15:57 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-10-12 07:02 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-11 19:40 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-10-11 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-10-11 14:18 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  44. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  45. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  46. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  47. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  48. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  49. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  50. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  51. 2026-10-03 16:48 UTCOSV refresh
  52. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  53. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  54. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  55. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  56. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  57. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  58. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  59. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  60. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  61. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  62. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  63. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  64. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  65. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  66. 2026-09-14 07:30 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-14 03:28 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-09-14 03:28 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  70. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  71. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  72. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  73. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  74. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  75. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53622?
CVE-2026-53622 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 16, 2026. Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Versions prior to 3.7.3, 3.6.18, and 2.11.51 have a critical vulnerability in Traefik's HTTP/3 (QUIC) TLS configuration selection that allows unauthenticated clients to bypass router-specific mTLS enforcement. When HTTP/3 is enabled on an…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-53622 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-53622 was published on June 16, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 2, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-53622 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53622 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (50th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53622?
CVE-2026-53622 has a CVSS v3 base score of 10.0 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53622?
A fix for CVE-2026-53622 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-53622 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53622

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53622?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.