Traefik is a golang, Cloud Native Application Proxy. When a HTTP request is processed by Traefik, certain HTTP headers such as X-Forwarded-Host or X-Forwarded-Port are added by Traefik before the request is routed to the application. For a HTTP client, it should not be possible to remove or modify these headers. Since the application trusts the value of these headers, security implications might arise, if they can be modified. For HTTP/1.1, however, it was found that some of theses custom headers can indeed be removed and in certain cases manipulated. The attack relies on the HTTP/1.1 behavior, that headers can be defined as hop-by-hop via the HTTP Connection header. This issue has been addressed in release versions 2.11.9 and 3.1.3. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.
CVE-2024-45410
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 1.5% (74th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory CVSS 7.5 is lower than this score; a lower GitHub score revises it only when its advisory is newer than the CVE record's last change, and this advisory (published 2024-09-19) is not newer than that change (2024-09-25), so it does not.
Also known asEUVD-2024-2723 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-62c8-mh53-4cqv (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 75EG Risk 75/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 1.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 74th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 1.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 19, 2024
Last Modified
September 25, 2024
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Oct 7, 2026HTTP client can remove the X-Forwarded headers · Advisory · traefik/traefik · GitHub
https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-62c8-mh53-4cqvv3.1.3
Patch available: traefik/traefik v3.1.3
https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.1.3v2.11.9
Patch available: traefik/traefik v2.11.9
https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.9Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-45410(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(3)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | devspaces/udi-rhel9:3.21-6 | 2025-05-28 | redhat |
| go | github.com/traefik/traefik @ 2.11.9 (fixes < 2.11.9) | — | ghsa |
| go | github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 @ 3.1.3 (fixes >= 3.0.0-beta3, < 3.1.3) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(3 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(3)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/traefik/traefik | — |
| — |
| github.com/traefik/traefik/v2 | — |
| — |
| github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 24× in last 7d / 77× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 98 of 245 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 147 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 07:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 07:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-02 07:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-62c8-mh53-4cqv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-11-01 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
- 2026-11-01 08:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-62c8-mh53-4cqv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-11-01 08:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 07:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 07:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
- 2026-10-31 07:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 07:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
- 2026-10-30 06:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 06:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
- 2026-10-29 06:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 06:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
- 2026-10-28 06:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 06:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
- 2026-10-27 06:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 06:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
- 2026-10-26 02:04 UTCVendor advisory
Show 73 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-25 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
- 2026-10-25 01:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 01:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
- 2026-10-24 01:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 01:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
- 2026-10-23 01:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 01:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
- 2026-10-22 01:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 01:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
- 2026-10-21 01:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 01:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
- 2026-10-20 00:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 00:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
- 2026-10-18 23:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 23:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
- 2026-10-18 07:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 23:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 23:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-17 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
- 2026-10-16 23:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 23:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
- 2026-10-15 20:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 20:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-10-14 14:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 14:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-10-13 14:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 17:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-10-12 13:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 21:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-10-10 13:55 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-09-30 19:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-09-21 20:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-09-20 23:17 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-19 15:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
Publicly available exploits
(1 reference)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- GitHub PoCjphetphoumy/traefik-CVE-2024-45410-pocPublished Sep 26, 2024
A proof of concept of traefik CVE to understand the impact
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownGo:github.com/traefik/traefik/v3
Same vendor
4 shownredhat:RHSA-2025:8244
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2024-45410?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-45410 published?
Is CVE-2024-45410 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-45410?
How do I remediate CVE-2024-45410?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-45410
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-45410?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.