CVE-2026-44774

CRITICALNVD 9.99.9
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.9 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (40th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-30566 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-96qj-4jj5-wcjc (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.9EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 9.9Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to 2.11.46, 3.6.17, and 3.7.1, Traefik's Kubernetes Gateway API provider allows a tenant with HTTPRoute creation permissions to expose the REST provider handler, bypassing the providers.rest.insecure=false setting. The Gateway provider accepts any TraefikService backend reference whose name ends with @internal, making it possible to route traffic to rest@internal in addition to the intended api@internal. In shared Gateway deployments where the REST provider is enabled, this allows a low-privileged actor to gain live dynamic configuration write access to Traefik, enabling unauthorized reconfiguration of routers and services. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.11.46, 3.6.17, and 3.7.1.

CVSS v3
9.9
EG Score
9.9CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
60
EG Risk 60/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity99% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.5% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
40th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.9 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 15, 2026

Last Modified

August 13, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Oct 30, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github_release, github.
GitHub release Patch Available

v3.7.1

Patch available: traefik/traefik v3.7.1

https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.1
GitHub release Patch Available

v3.6.17

Patch available: traefik/traefik v3.6.17

https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.17
GitHub release Patch Available

v2.11.46

Patch available: traefik/traefik v2.11.46

https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.46
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)🟡 PoC Available

Gateway API TraefikService backend accepts rest@internal, allowing unauthorized exposure of the REST provider despite providers.rest.insecure=false · Advisory · traefik/traefik · GitHub

https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-96qj-4jj5-wcjc
Red Hat

2477937 – (CVE-2026-44774) CVE-2026-44774 traefik: Traefik: Privilege escalation via Kubernetes Gateway API provider configuration bypass

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2477937
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

CVE-2026-44774 - Red Hat Customer Portal

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-44774
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:36820

Patch Availability(5)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatdevspaces/traefik-rhel9:17824032742026-07-08redhat
gogithub.com/traefik/traefik—ghsa
gogithub.com/traefik/traefik/v2 @ 2.11.46 (fixes <= 2.11.45)—ghsa
gogithub.com/traefik/traefik/v3 @ 3.7.1 (fixes = 3.7.0)—ghsa
gogithub.com/traefik/traefik/v3 @ 3.6.17 (fixes <= 3.6.16)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(3)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/traefik/traefik—
  • every version through 1.7.34: no fix on record
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
github.com/traefik/traefik/v2—
  • every version up to 2.11.46: fixed in 2.11.46
—
github.com/traefik/traefik/v33.7.0
  • 3.7.0 up to 3.7.1: fixed in 3.7.1
  • every version up to 3.6.17: fixed in 3.6.17
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 76× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 309 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 209 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-01 23:16 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-01 23:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-96qj-4jj5-wcjc · GitHub severity MODERATE
  4. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  5. 2026-11-01 07:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-96qj-4jj5-wcjc · GitHub severity MODERATE
  6. 2026-10-31 21:29 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-31 21:29 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  9. 2026-10-30 19:43 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-30 19:43 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  12. 2026-10-29 17:56 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-29 17:56 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  15. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  16. 2026-10-28 16:07 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-28 16:07 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  19. 2026-10-27 14:19 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-27 14:19 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  22. 2026-10-26 12:12 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-26 12:12 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  25. 2026-10-25 14:27 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-25 10:21 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-25 10:21 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  4. 2026-10-24 08:34 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-24 08:34 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  7. 2026-10-23 06:47 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-23 06:47 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  10. 2026-10-22 05:00 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-22 05:00 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  13. 2026-10-21 03:13 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-21 03:13 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  16. 2026-10-20 01:24 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-20 01:24 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 23:37 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-18 23:37 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 03:38 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-17 21:51 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 21:51 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  26. 2026-10-16 20:02 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-16 20:02 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  29. 2026-10-15 17:36 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-15 17:36 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  32. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  33. 2026-10-14 11:24 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-14 11:24 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  36. 2026-10-13 09:38 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-13 09:38 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  39. 2026-10-12 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-12 07:49 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-11 19:47 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-10-11 17:01 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-10-11 14:27 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  45. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  46. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  47. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  48. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  49. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  50. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  51. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  52. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  53. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  54. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  55. 2026-09-30 11:17 UTCOSV refresh
  56. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  57. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  58. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  59. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  60. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  61. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  62. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  63. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  64. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  65. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  66. 2026-09-11 18:10 UTCOSV refresh
  67. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  68. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  69. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  70. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  71. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  72. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  73. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  74. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  75. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-44774?
CVE-2026-44774 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 15, 2026. Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to 2.11.46, 3.6.17, and 3.7.1, Traefik's Kubernetes Gateway API provider allows a tenant with HTTPRoute creation permissions to expose the REST provider handler, bypassing the providers.rest.insecure=false setting. The Gateway provider…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-44774 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-44774 was published on May 15, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 13, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-44774 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-44774 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (40th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-44774?
CVE-2026-44774 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.9 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-44774?
A fix for CVE-2026-44774 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-44774 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-44774

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-44774?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.