gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Prior to 1.82.2 and 1.83.2, servers created with xds.NewGRPCServer() allow internal/transport/http2_server.go to accept an RPC containing neither the :authority header nor the Host header, while RouteAndProcess in internal/xds/server/routing.go assumes that an authority value exists and indexes the empty slice. A remote client that can complete transport connection establishment can trigger an index-out-of-bounds panic that is not recovered by the per-RPC goroutine and terminates the entire server process. In insecure or ordinary TLS deployments the request can be unauthenticated, while strict mTLS or ALTS deployments require valid transport credentials before the malformed RPC can reach the interceptor. This issue is fixed in versions 1.82.2 and 1.83.2.
CVE-2026-84445
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 8.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (50th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-77627 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-2v4p-qf9q-27wj (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.7
- EG Score
- 8.7HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 54EG Risk 54/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity87% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.6% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 50th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 8.7 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 8, 2026
Last Modified
September 25, 2026
Advisory Details (10)
Auto-updated Sep 14, 2026Release 1.83.2
Patch available: grpc/grpc-go v1.83.2
https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/releases/tag/v1.83.2Release 1.82.2
Patch available: grpc/grpc-go v1.82.2
https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/releases/tag/v1.82.2commit 93e31b48545e (grpc/grpc-go)
Fix landed in grpc/grpc-go commit 93e31b48545e — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/commit/93e31b48545e2a8aaeb6e06b47fb249f94e6297fcommit 8668b69c167d (grpc/grpc-go)
Patch available: grpc/grpc-go v1.83.2 (contains commit 8668b69c167d)
https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/commit/8668b69c167df908b6b3666dcbf40992b9e932a4commit 3822494d8ea0 (grpc/grpc-go)
Patch available: grpc/grpc-go v1.82.2 (contains commit 3822494d8ea0)
https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/commit/3822494d8ea03b992c089fd2a195f041762fffb7cherry-pick #9365 to v1.82.x
Patch available: grpc/grpc-go v1.82.2 (PR #9367 merged 2026-08-25)
https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/pull/9367cherry-pick #9365 to v1.83.x
Patch available: grpc/grpc-go v1.83.2 (PR #9366 merged 2026-08-25)
https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/pull/9366transport: reject requests missing :authority and host headers
Fix merged in grpc/grpc-go PR #9365 on 2026-08-25 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/pull/9365xds: server crashes with 'index out of range' when a request omits :authority · Issue #9354 · grpc/grpc-go · GitHub
https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/9354Denial of Service (DoS) via crash due to missing `:authority` and `Host` headers in gRPC-Go xDS servers · Advisory · grpc/grpc-go · GitHub
https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/security/advisories/GHSA-2v4p-qf9q-27wjVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-84445(20)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:92859Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Satellite 6.17 security update
- RHSA-2026:92861Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Satellite 6.19 security update
- RHSA-2026:92858Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Satellite 6.16 EUS security update
- RHSA-2026:92860Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Satellite 6.18 security update
- RHSA-2026:92593Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Logging for Red Hat OpenShift - 6.6.2
- RHSA-2026:92515Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Logging for Red Hat OpenShift - 6.6.2
- RHSA-2026:92510Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 3.4.6 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- RHSA-2026:92372Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: osbuild-composer security update
- +12 more
Patch Availability(34)
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-google-grpc | 1.33.3-2 ... 1.81.1-1 (24 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-google-grpc | 1.64.0-7 ... 1.81.1-1 (7 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-google-grpc | 1.64.0-7 ... 1.81.1-1 (7 versions) |
| — |
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| google.golang.org/grpc | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(25)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
- Microsoft MSRCCVE-2026-844452026-09-16
gRPC-Go: Denial of Service (DoS) via crash due to missing `:authority` and `Host` headers in the xDS servers
- Red HatRHSA-2026:70593IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:70593 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:71116IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:71116 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:71117IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:71117 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:72275IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:72275 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:72394IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:72394 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:72395IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:72395 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:72399IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:72399 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:72470IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:72470 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:72475IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:72475 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:72476IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:72476 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:72848IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:72848 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:72849IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:72849 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:72850IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:72850 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:72851IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:72851 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:72853IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:72853 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:72854IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:72854 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:72879IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:72879 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:72884IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:72884 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:72892IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:72892 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:73105IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:73105 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:73125IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:73125 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:73538IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:73538 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:73915IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:73915 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:73987IMPORTANT2026-09-14
RHSA-2026:73987 — Important
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 67× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 137 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 37 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-11-01 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2v4p-qf9q-27wj · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-11-01 07:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-27 21:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 21:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-25 13:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-20 09:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 09:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-13 05:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 05:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-12 14:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 22:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 19:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-11 10:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 10:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-10 08:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 20:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-09 00:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 00:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-08 02:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 02:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-07 14:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 02:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 02:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-06 14:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 02:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 02:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-05 14:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 02:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 02:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-04 14:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 03:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 15:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 15:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-03 03:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 03:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-02 15:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 03:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 03:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-01 14:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 02:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 02:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 02:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 02:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 14:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 02:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 02:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 14:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 14:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-28 02:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 14:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 14:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-27 02:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 02:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 02:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 14:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 07:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 19:18 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
3 shownDebian:12:golang-google-grpc
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:72848 · redhat:RHSA-2026:70593 · redhat:RHSA-2026:72394
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-84445?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-84445 published?
Is CVE-2026-84445 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-84445?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-84445?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-84445
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-84445?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.