OpenTelemetry-Go is the Go implementation of OpenTelemetry. From version 1.5.0 to 1.44.0, sdk/trace.NewTracerProvider emits a TracerProvider created internal Info-level diagnostic event whose MarshalLog implementations recursively include span processor, exporter, and client configuration. Applications that call otel.SetLogger to enable OpenTelemetry internal Info logging can therefore record OTLP gRPC and HTTP collector endpoints, the OTLP HTTP Insecure flag, and complete Zipkin collector URLs. A person or system with access to those logs can learn internal collector topology and can recover credentials or tokens embedded in Zipkin URL user information or query strings. The default OpenTelemetry logger does not emit the event, and this path does not log OTLP authentication headers, TLS key material, or span payloads. This issue is fixed in version 1.45.0.
CVE-2026-81870
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This low-severity CVE scores 2.0 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (18th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-81098 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-8wmf-6v46-5gfg (GitHub Security Advisories) · GO-2026-6505 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 2.0
- EG Score
- 2.0LOWmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 25EG Risk 25/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity20% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 2.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 18th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (2.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 2.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 2.0 LOWCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 16, 2026
Last Modified
September 30, 2026
References (5)
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/commit/3a1412d2b3bc4e4231fbeac2ed42117ae541bb38
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/pull/8438
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/releases/tag/exporters/zipkin/v1.45.0
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/releases/tag/sdk/v1.45.0
- security-advisories@github · CISA-ADPhttps://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/security/advisories/GHSA-8wmf-6v46-5gfg
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-81870(4)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:72475Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.20.1
- RHSA-2026:72395Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.20.1
- CVE-2026-81870Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)Low
OpenTelemetry-Go: Exporter config logging may leak endpoint URLs in info logs
- GHSA-8wmf-6v46-5gfgGitHub Security AdvisoriesLow
OpenTelemetry-Go: Exporter config logging may leak endpoint URLs in info logs
Patch Availability(3)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | cert-manager/cert-manager-istio-csr-rhel9:1790223719 | 2026-09-28 | redhat |
| redhat | cert-manager/cert-manager-istio-csr-rhel9:1790589914 | 2026-09-28 | redhat |
| go | go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace @ 1.45.0 (fixes >= 1.5.0, <= 1.44.0) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(7 across 3 ecosystems)
Go(5)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace | — |
| — |
| go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpc | — |
| — |
| go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttp | — |
| — |
| go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/zipkin | — |
| — |
| go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-opentelemetry-otel | 1.31.0-4 ... 1.46.0-2 (9 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-opentelemetry-otel | 1.31.0-4 ... 1.46.0-2 (9 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-11-01 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8wmf-6v46-5gfg · GitHub severity LOW
- 2026-11-01 07:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-29 17:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 17:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-27 05:55 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-25 13:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
Show 48 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-12 14:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-09 13:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 13:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-06 13:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 13:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-03 16:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 16:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-09-30 18:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 18:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-09-29 07:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 07:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-09-26 09:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 09:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-09-23 11:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 11:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-09-20 13:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 13:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
- 2026-09-17 15:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 15:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 20:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 20:09 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 2.0 LOW
- 2026-09-16 20:09 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
9 shownGo:go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttp · Go:go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk · Debian:13:golang-opentelemetry-otel
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:72395
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-81870?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-81870 published?
Is CVE-2026-81870 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-81870?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-81870?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-81870
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-81870?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.