CVE-2026-74428

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-08-15. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-59575 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

rxrpc: Fix double unlock in rxrpc_recvmsg()

Fix a double unlock in rxrpc_recvmsg() when dealing with OOB messages.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
44
EG Risk 44/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
51st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-02). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Oct 31, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

rxrpc: Fix double unlock in rxrpc_recvmsg() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a2f299b4d5510147fa8629a6aba2869bbcc88aea
Web page

rxrpc: Fix double unlock in rxrpc_recvmsg() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8cd8cf3052fff9a4b86b25734f610e4af03786d3
Web page

rxrpc: Fix double unlock in rxrpc_recvmsg() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1297ae6aeebc3863cb437e42a1bc4cd6173e43d9

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74428(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(6)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (160 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.5-1: fixed in 7.1.5-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(6)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 29× in last 7d / 127× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 496 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 396 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 17:10 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 17:10 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 17:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  5. 2026-11-01 18:31 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-11-01 18:31 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-01 18:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  9. 2026-10-31 19:52 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-31 19:52 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-31 19:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  13. 2026-10-30 21:12 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-30 21:12 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-30 21:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  17. 2026-10-29 22:33 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-29 22:33 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-29 22:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  21. 2026-10-28 23:53 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-28 23:53 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-28 23:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  25. 2026-10-28 01:14 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-28 01:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  2. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  3. 2026-10-27 02:31 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-27 02:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  5. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  6. 2026-10-25 23:47 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-25 23:47 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-25 23:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 14:04 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-25 01:01 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-25 01:01 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-25 01:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  15. 2026-10-24 02:22 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-24 02:22 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-24 02:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  19. 2026-10-23 03:42 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-23 03:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  22. 2026-10-22 04:59 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-22 04:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  25. 2026-10-21 06:18 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-21 06:18 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-21 06:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  28. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  29. 2026-10-20 07:38 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-20 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  31. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  32. 2026-10-19 08:55 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-19 08:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  34. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  35. 2026-10-18 10:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  36. 2026-10-18 03:14 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  38. 2026-10-17 11:27 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-10-17 11:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  40. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  41. 2026-10-16 12:46 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-10-16 12:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  43. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  44. 2026-10-15 13:55 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-10-15 13:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  46. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  47. 2026-10-14 08:47 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-10-14 08:47 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-14 08:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  50. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  51. 2026-10-13 04:21 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-10-13 04:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  53. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  54. 2026-10-12 15:40 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-10-12 05:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  56. 2026-10-11 19:25 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-10-11 16:41 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-10-11 14:00 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  60. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  61. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  62. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  63. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  64. 2026-10-07 06:07 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-07 06:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  66. 2026-10-07 02:19 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-07 02:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  68. 2026-10-06 22:22 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-06 22:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  70. 2026-10-06 17:11 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-10-06 17:11 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-10-06 17:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  73. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  74. 2026-10-06 13:11 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-10-06 13:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr6m-prj2-3cff · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-74428?
CVE-2026-74428 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxrpc: Fix double unlock in rxrpc_recvmsg() Fix a double unlock in rxrpc_recvmsg() when dealing with OOB messages.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-74428 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-74428 was published on August 15, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-74428 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74428 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (51st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74428?
CVE-2026-74428 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74428?
A fix for CVE-2026-74428 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-74428 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-74428

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74428?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.