CVE-2026-52737

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.35.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 5.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-07-02. A secondary CVSS source baseline 5.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-61163 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-gvjc-3w7c-92jx (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 5.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to 4.5.0, a malicious unauthenticated P2P peer can answer Zebra's outbound getblocks or FindBlocks request with a small two-hash inventory and then serve a syntactically valid block whose coinbase height is far above the local chain tip. In zebrad/src/components/sync/downloads.rs, BlockDownloadVerifyError::AboveLookaheadHeightLimit originally carried only the block height and hash, so handle_block_response could not attribute the failure to the advertising peer. The error then reached the restart-worthy default path in zebrad/src/components/sync.rs, cancelling all in-flight downloads from honest peers and imposing a 67-second sync restart delay on mainnet. Because the peer was neither scored nor disconnected, the peer could repeat the cycle indefinitely with minimal bandwidth and significantly degrade synchronization without corrupting state. This issue is fixed in version 4.5.0.

CVSS v3
5.3
EG Score
5.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
39
EG Risk 39/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity53% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
18th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 2, 2026

Last Modified

September 9, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 18, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_pr, github_commit, github_release.
GitHub release Patch Available

Zebra 4.5.0

Patch available: ZcashFoundation/zebra v4.5.0

https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/releases/tag/v4.5.0
GitHub commit

commit bc64dfe45746 (ZcashFoundation/zebra)

Fix landed in ZcashFoundation/zebra commit bc64dfe45746 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/commit/bc64dfe45746a86d14546a0a5a766387dd5a2942
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 1440b43ca7df (ZcashFoundation/zebra)

Patch available: ZcashFoundation/zebra v4.5.0 (contains commit 1440b43ca7df)

https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/commit/1440b43ca7df59aca948090d45117557b217a6cd
GitHub pull request Patch Available

release: v4.5.0

Patch available: ZcashFoundation/zebra v4.5.0 (PR #10647 merged 2026-05-29)

https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/pull/10647
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Sync restart poisoning from single unauthenticated peer via above-lookahead block · Advisory · ZcashFoundation/zebra · GitHub

https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/security/advisories/GHSA-gvjc-3w7c-92jx

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-52737(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
rustzebra-consensus @ 7.0.0 (fixes <= 6.0.0)—ghsa
rustzebrad @ 4.5.0 (fixes <= 4.4.1)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 1 ecosystem)
crates.io(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
zebra-consensus—
  • every version up to 7.0.0: fixed in 7.0.0
—
zebrad—
  • every version up to 4.5.0: fixed in 4.5.0
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 07:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gvjc-3w7c-92jx · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  3. 2026-11-01 07:45 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 12:55 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  7. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  8. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  9. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 14:21 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  13. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  14. 2026-10-22 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  17. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  18. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 03:32 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  22. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  23. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  24. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  25. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
Show 66 more
  1. 2026-10-13 14:54 UTCOSV refresh
  2. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 15:58 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 19:41 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:56 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 14:19 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  11. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  12. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  13. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  14. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  15. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  16. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  17. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  18. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  19. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  20. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  21. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  22. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  23. 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  24. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  25. 2026-09-23 06:38 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  27. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  28. 2026-09-18 06:14 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  30. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  31. 2026-09-13 16:57 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  33. 2026-09-12 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  35. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  36. 2026-09-09 22:59 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  38. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  39. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  40. 2026-09-05 23:53 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  42. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  43. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  44. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  45. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  46. 2026-08-30 11:22 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  48. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  49. 2026-08-27 22:15 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  51. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  52. 2026-08-25 13:42 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-24 11:18 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-08-23 09:29 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  56. 2026-08-22 07:40 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  58. 2026-08-21 05:51 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  60. 2026-08-20 04:02 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  62. 2026-08-18 20:25 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-07-30 23:33 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-07-26 13:02 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-07-23 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-07-02 20:07 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-52737?
CVE-2026-52737 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 2, 2026. ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to 4.5.0, a malicious unauthenticated P2P peer can answer Zebra's outbound getblocks or FindBlocks request with a small two-hash inventory and then serve a syntactically valid block whose coinbase height is far above the local chain tip. In…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-52737 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-52737 was published on July 2, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 9, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-52737 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-52737 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (18th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-52737?
CVE-2026-52737 has a CVSS base score of 5.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-52737?
A fix for CVE-2026-52737 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-52737 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-52737

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-52737?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.