The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023.
CVE-2023-44487
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2023-10-10), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.5 HIGH under NVD CVSS v3. Confidence: HIGH.
Also known asEUVD-2023-2795 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-qppj-fm5r-hxr3 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- 2,205 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running an affected version — derived from Shodan data (© Shodan); a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
A fix is available — apply it.
2,205 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running a version that maps to CVE-2023-44487, in our KEV-Exposure radar’s Shodan-derived sample.
How it counts: every 12 hours, when Shodan query credits allow, the radar runs one Shodan query per tracked product, reads up to 100 ip:port services per query, and keeps a service when its banner version matches a CISA-KEV or high-EPSS CVE; a service is dropped when neither a search nor a Shodan InternetDB port re-check has refreshed it for 21 days. A re-check that finds the port still listed by Shodan InternetDB refreshes the service without re-reading the banner, so a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open. A count is a banner-version inference over a sample, not an exploit test and not an internet-wide census, and the unit is a service, not a machine: a machine answering on two ports counts twice.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 89EG Risk 89/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high. - EPSS PROB
- >99.9%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.5 HIGH.
- EG Severity
- 7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- >99.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Attend at medium mission impactAttend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2023/10/10/http2-rapid-reset-vulnerability-cve-2023-44487 · https://blog.cloudflare.com/technical-breakdown-http2-rapid-reset-ddos-attack/ · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-44487
Published
October 10, 2023
Last Modified
October 14, 2026
Advisory Details (20)
Auto-updated Oct 29, 2026http: Fix CVE CVE-2023-44487
Fix merged in envoyproxy/envoy PR #30055 on 2023-10-10 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/pull/30055HTTP/2 "Rapid Reset" DDoS Attack Disclosed By Google, Cloudflare & AWS - Phoronix
https://www.phoronix.com/news/HTTP2-Rapid-Reset-AttackHTTP/2 Zero-Day vulnerability results in record-breaking DDoS attacks | Cloudflare Blog
https://blog.cloudflare.com/zero-day-rapid-reset-http2-record-breaking-ddos-attack/The largest DDoS attack to date, peaking above 398M rps | Hacker News
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37831062Google Cloud mitigated largest DDoS attack, peaking above 398 million rps | Google Cloud Blog
https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/google-cloud-mitigated-largest-ddos-attack-peaking-above-398-million-rps/How it works: The novel HTTP/2 ‘Rapid Reset’ DDoS attack | Google Cloud Blog
https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/how-it-works-the-novel-http2-rapid-reset-ddos-attackCVE-2023-44487 - HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Attack
https://aws.amazon.com/security/security-bulletins/AWS-2023-011/HTTP/2 Rapid Reset: deconstructing the record-breaking attack | Cloudflare Blog
https://blog.cloudflare.com/technical-breakdown-http2-rapid-reset-ddos-attack/core/release-notes/6.0/6.0.23/6.0.23.md at e4613450ea0da7fd2fc6b61dfb2c1c1dec1ce9ec · dotnet/core · GitHub
https://github.com/dotnet/core/blob/e4613450ea0da7fd2fc6b61dfb2c1c1dec1ce9ec/release-notes/6.0/6.0.23/6.0.23.md?plain=1#L73Biggest DDoSes of all time generated by protocol 0-day in HTTP/2 - Ars Technica
https://arstechnica.com/security/2023/10/how-ddosers-used-the-http-2-protocol-to-deliver-attacks-of-unprecedented-size/CVE-2023-44487 - Red Hat Customer Portal
Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2023-44487oss-security - Re: CVE-2023-44487: HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack against many implementations
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/20/8oss-security - CVE-2023-45802: Apache HTTP Server: HTTP/2 stream memory not reclaimed right away on RST
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/19/6oss-security - Re: CVE-2023-44487: HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack against many implementations
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/18/8oss-security - Vulnerability in Jenkins
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/18/4oss-security - Re: CVE-2023-44487: HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack against many implementations
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/9oss-security - Re: CVE-2023-44487: HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack against many implementations
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/4oss-security - Re: CVE-2023-44487: HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack against many implementations
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/10/7oss-security - CVE-2023-44487: HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack against many implementations
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/10/6Vendor Advisories for CVE-2023-44487(20)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:0722Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: multicluster engine for Kubernetes v2.8.4 security update
- RHSA-2025:23529Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11.9 security update
- RHSA-2025:23528Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6 security update
- RHSA-2025:16668Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1.12 on RHEL 7 security update
- RHSA-2025:7497Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: tomcat security update
- RHSA-2024:4631Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.15.0 release
- RHSA-2024:4118Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.3 security, bug fix, and enhancement update
- RHSA-2024:4119Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Updated rhceph-5.3 container image and security update
- +12 more
Patch Availability(42)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | multicluster-engine/kube-rbac-proxy-mce-rhel9:1766274324 | 2026-01-15 | redhat |
| redhat | rhacm2/kube-rbac-proxy-rhel9:v2.11 | 2025-12-17 | redhat |
| redhat | multicluster-engine/kube-rbac-proxy-mce-rhel9:v2.6 | 2025-12-17 | redhat |
| redhat | eap7-wildfly-0:7.1.12-2.GA_redhat_00002.1.ep7.el7 | 2025-09-25 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat-1:10.1.36-1.el10_0 | 2025-05-13 | redhat |
| redhat | devspaces/udi-rhel8:3.15-5 | 2024-07-18 | redhat |
| redhat | rhceph/rhceph-5-dashboard-rhel8:5-87 | 2024-06-26 | redhat |
| redhat | ceph-2:16.2.10-266.el8cp | 2024-06-26 | redhat |
| redhat | rhceph/snmp-notifier-rhel9:1.2.1-57 | 2024-05-01 | redhat |
| redhat | helm-0:3.13.2-35.el9 | 2024-04-18 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift4/ovirt-csi-driver-rhel8-operator:v4.15.0-202404030309.p0.ge9b0fa2.assembly.stream.el8 | 2024-04-16 | redhat |
| redhat | nodejs:16-8090020240315081818.a75119d5 | 2024-03-20 | redhat |
| redhat | rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:1.1-97 | 2024-03-18 | redhat |
| redhat | kube-descheduler-operator/kube-descheduler-rhel9-operator:v5.0-14 | 2024-03-06 | redhat |
| redhat | run-once-duration-override-operator/run-once-duration-override-rhel9-operator:v1.1-5 | 2024-02-28 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift4/ovirt-csi-driver-rhel9:v4.15.0-202401261531.p0.gb8d25ad.assembly.stream | 2024-02-27 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift-sandboxed-containers/osc-rhel9-operator:1.5.2-3 | 2024-02-15 | redhat |
| redhat | jenkins-0:2.426.3.1706516352-3.el8 | 2024-02-12 | redhat |
| redhat | albo/aws-load-balancer-rhel8-operator:1.0.1-2 | 2024-01-30 | redhat |
| redhat | mta/mta-cli-rhel9:7.0.0-44 | 2024-01-30 | redhat |
| redhat | albo/aws-load-balancer-rhel8-operator:1.1.1-1 | 2024-01-30 | redhat |
| redhat | edo/external-dns-rhel8-operator:1.1.1-4 | 2024-01-29 | redhat |
| redhat | edo/external-dns-rhel8-operator:1.0.1-6 | 2024-01-29 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift4/ose-openshift-apiserver-rhel8:v4.13.0-202312040608.p0.g6c07330.assembly.stream | 2023-12-13 | redhat |
| redhat | rhceph/rhceph-6-dashboard-rhel9:6-82 | 2023-12-12 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift4/ose-gcp-cloud-controller-manager-rhel8:v4.14.0-202311300410.p0.g09e96a9.assembly.stream | 2023-12-12 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift-pipelines/pipelines-workingdirinit-rhel8:v1.10.6-10 | 2023-12-07 | redhat |
| redhat | container-native-virtualization/virt-artifacts-server-rhel9:v4.14.1-4 | 2023-12-07 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift-pipelines-client-0:1.10.6-11031.el8 | 2023-12-07 | redhat |
| redhat | cri-o-0:1.25.5-2.rhaos4.12.git0217273.el8 | 2023-12-06 | redhat |
| go | golang.org/x/net @ 0.17.0 (fixes < 0.17.0) | — | ghsa |
| maven | com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core @ 10.5.3 (fixes < 10.5.3) | — | ghsa |
| maven | com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core_2.11 | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core @ 8.5.94 (fixes >= 8.5.0, < 8.5.94) | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core @ 9.0.81 (fixes >= 9.0.0, < 9.0.81) | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core @ 10.1.14 (fixes >= 10.0.0, < 10.1.14) | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core @ 11.0.0-M12 (fixes >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.0-M12) | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.eclipse.jetty.http2:http2-common @ 11.0.17 (fixes >= 11.0.0, < 11.0.17) | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.eclipse.jetty.http2:http2-common @ 10.0.17 (fixes >= 10.0.0, < 10.0.17) | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.eclipse.jetty.http2:http2-common @ 9.4.53 (fixes >= 9.3.0, < 9.4.53) | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.eclipse.jetty.http2:jetty-http2-common @ 12.0.2 (fixes >= 12.0.0, < 12.0.2) | — | ghsa |
| swift | github.com/apple/swift-nio-http2 @ 1.28.0 (fixes < 1.28.0) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(50 across 18 ecosystems)
Debian:11(7)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| dnsdist | 1.5.1-3 ... 2.1.1-1 (45 versions) |
| — |
| grpc | 1.30.2-3 ... 1.82.0-1 (22 versions) |
| — |
| h2o | 2.2.5+dfsg2-10 ... 2.2.5+dfsg2-9 (10 versions) |
| — |
| haproxy | — |
| — |
| jetty9 | 9.4.39-3 ... 9.4.50-4 (17 versions) |
| — |
| netty | 1:4.1.48-4, 1:4.1.48-4+deb11u1 |
| — |
| nghttp2 | 1.43.0-1 |
| — |
Debian:12(7)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| dnsdist | 1.7.3-2 ... 2.1.2-1 (37 versions) |
| — |
| grpc | 1.51.1-3 ... 1.83.0-1 (12 versions) |
| — |
| h2o | 2.2.5+dfsg2-10 ... 2.2.5+dfsg2-9 (7 versions) |
| — |
| haproxy | — |
| — |
| jetty9 | 9.4.50-4, 9.4.50-4+deb12u1 |
| — |
| netty | 1:4.1.48-7 |
| — |
| nghttp2 | 1.52.0-1 |
| — |
Debian:13(6)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| dnsdist | — |
| — |
| grpc | 1.51.1-6 ... 1.83.0-1 (7 versions) |
| — |
| haproxy | — |
| — |
| jetty9 | — |
| — |
| netty | — |
| — |
| nghttp2 | — |
| — |
Debian:14(6)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| dnsdist | — |
| — |
| grpc | 1.51.1-6 ... 1.83.0-1 (7 versions) |
| — |
| haproxy | — |
| — |
| jetty9 | — |
| — |
| netty | — |
| — |
| nghttp2 | — |
| — |
Debian:10(4)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| h2o | 2.2.5+dfsg2-2, 2.2.5+dfsg2-2+deb10u1 |
| — |
| jetty9 | 9.4.15-1 ... 9.4.50-4 (40 versions) |
| — |
| netty | 1:4.1.33-1, 1:4.1.33-1+deb10u1, 1:4.1.33-1+deb10u2, 1:4.1.33-1+deb10u3 |
| — |
| nghttp2 | 1.36.0-2, 1.36.0-2+deb10u1 |
| — |
Maven(4)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core | 3.0.0-RC1 |
| — |
| com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core_2.11 | 10.0.0 ... 3.0.0-RC1 (58 versions) |
| — |
| com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core_2.12 | 10.0.0 ... 10.5.2 (59 versions) |
| — |
| com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core_2.13 | 10.1.10 ... 10.5.2 (31 versions) |
| — |
Alpine:v3.15(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| lighttpd | — |
| — |
| nghttp2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.16(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| lighttpd | — |
| — |
| nghttp2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.17(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| lighttpd | — |
| — |
| nghttp2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.21(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| nghttp2 | — |
| — |
| nginx | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.18(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| nghttp2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.19(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| nghttp2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.20(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| nghttp2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.22(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| nghttp2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.23(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| nghttp2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.24(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| nghttp2 | — |
| — |
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang.org/x/net | — |
| — |
Swift(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/apple/swift-nio-http2 | — | 1.28.0 (one range) | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(20)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
- Microsoft MSRCCVE-2023-444872023-10-10
MITRE: CVE-2023-44487 HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Attack
- Red HatRHBA-2023:5806IMPORTANT2023-10-10
RHBA-2023:5806 — Important
- Red HatRHBA-2023:5949IMPORTANT2023-10-10
RHBA-2023:5949 — Important
- Red HatRHBA-2023:6078IMPORTANT2023-10-10
RHBA-2023:6078 — Important
- Red HatRHBA-2023:6109IMPORTANT2023-10-10
RHBA-2023:6109 — Important
- Red HatRHBA-2023:6254IMPORTANT2023-10-10
RHBA-2023:6254 — Important
- Red HatRHBA-2023:6863IMPORTANT2023-10-10
RHBA-2023:6863 — Important
- Red HatRHBA-2023:7492IMPORTANT2023-10-10
RHBA-2023:7492 — Important
- Red HatRHEA-2023:6562IMPORTANT2023-10-10
RHEA-2023:6562 — Important
- Red HatRHEA-2023:6741IMPORTANT2023-10-10
RHEA-2023:6741 — Important
- Red HatRHEA-2023:7235IMPORTANT2023-10-10
RHEA-2023:7235 — Important
- Red HatRHEA-2023:7239IMPORTANT2023-10-10
RHEA-2023:7239 — Important
- Red HatRHEA-2023:7327IMPORTANT2023-10-10
RHEA-2023:7327 — Important
- Red HatRHEA-2024:0536IMPORTANT2023-10-10
RHEA-2024:0536 — Important
- Red HatRHEA-2024:0537IMPORTANT2023-10-10
RHEA-2024:0537 — Important
- Red HatRHEA-2024:0555IMPORTANT2023-10-10
RHEA-2024:0555 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2023:5006IMPORTANT2023-10-10
RHSA-2023:5006 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2023:5009IMPORTANT2023-10-10
RHSA-2023:5009 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2023:5530IMPORTANT2023-10-10
RHSA-2023:5530 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2023:5541IMPORTANT2023-10-10
RHSA-2023:5541 — Important
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 102× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 920 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 820 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 08:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qppj-fm5r-hxr3 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-11-01 08:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 05:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 05:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-31 06:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 06:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 07:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 07:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 08:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 08:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 08:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 08:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS >99.9% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-27 09:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 09:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-26 10:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 11:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 11:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 11:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 11:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 12:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 12:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 13:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 13:26 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-21 14:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 14:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS >99.9% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-20 14:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 14:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 15:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 16:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 07:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 21:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 21:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 22:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 22:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 23:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 23:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 00:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 00:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 05:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 05:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 06:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 18:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 06:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 02:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 22:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 21:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 14:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 09:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 05:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 01:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 21:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 17:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 13:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 08:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 04:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 00:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 20:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 16:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 12:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 07:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 03:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 23:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 19:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 11:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 06:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 02:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 22:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 18:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 14:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 09:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 05:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 01:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 21:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 17:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 13:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 08:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 04:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 00:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 20:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 16:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 12:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 07:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 03:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 23:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 19:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 15:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 11:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 06:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 02:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 22:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 18:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:10 UTCVendor advisory
Publicly available exploits
(12 references, 10 shown)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Exploit-DB entry, 9 GitHub PoCs), as are 2 GitHub checker repositories. A GitHub repository named or described as a checker or scanner checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- GitHub PoCtpirate/cve-2023-44487-POCPublished Dec 14, 2025
poc for the rst dos attack discovered in 2023
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-52426Published Sep 16, 2025
HTTP/2 2.0 - Denial Of Service (DOS)
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCmoften/CVE-2023-44487-HTTP-2-Rapid-Reset-AttackPublished Apr 14, 2025
HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Exploit PoC
Open source ↗ - Open source ↗GitHub PoCthreatlabindonesia/CVE-2023-44487-HTTP-2-Rapid-Reset-Exploit-PoCPublished Dec 3, 2024
- GitHub PoCnxenon/cve-2023-44487Published Nov 10, 2023
Examples for Implementing cve-2023-44487 ( HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Attack ) Concept
Open source ↗ - GitHub checkerndrscodes/http2-rst-stream-attackerPublished Nov 8, 2023
Highly configurable tool to check a server's vulnerability against CVE-2023-44487 by rapidly sending HEADERS and RST_STREAM frames and documenting the server's responses.
Open source ↗ - Open source ↗GitHub PoCReToCode/golang-CVE-2023-44487Published Oct 25, 2023
- GitHub PoCstudiogangster/CVE-2023-44487Published Oct 16, 2023
A python based exploit to test out rapid reset attack (CVE-2023-44487)
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCsecengjeff/rapidresetclientPublished Oct 13, 2023
Tool for testing mitigations and exposure to Rapid Reset DDoS (CVE-2023-44487)
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCAppsynergy-io/CVE-2023-44487Published Oct 11, 2023
Proof of concept for DoS exploit
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownAlpine:v3.18:nghttp2 · Alpine:v3.15:lighttpd · Alpine:v3.17:varnish
- CVE-2019-9513NVD 7.5EG 8.9EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2019-9511NVD 7.5EG 8.3EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2020-11080EG 3.7EPSS p93LOW
- CVE-2025-8671EG 7.5EPSS p90HIGH
- CVE-2022-23959EG 9.1CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-8807EG 9.1EPSS p91CRITICAL
- CVE-2024-30156EG 7.5EPSS p90HIGH
- CVE-2022-45060EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2019-15892EG 7.5EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2017-12425EG 7.5HIGH
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHBA-2023:5806 · redhat:RHBA-2023:6109 · redhat:RHSA-2023:5530
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2023-44487?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2023-44487 published?
Is CVE-2023-44487 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-44487?
Which products are affected by CVE-2023-44487?
How do I remediate CVE-2023-44487?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2023-44487
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-44487?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.