CVE-2023-44487

CRITICALNVD 7.59.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2023-10-10), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.5 HIGH under NVD CVSS v3. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekExploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2023-2795 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-qppj-fm5r-hxr3 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • 2,205 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running an affected version — derived from Shodan data (© Shodan); a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: >99.9%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: 2,205

A fix is available — apply it.

The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023.

Internet exposure · derived from Shodan data

2,205 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running a version that maps to CVE-2023-44487, in our KEV-Exposure radar’s Shodan-derived sample.

across 87 countries (United States, China, Germany, Japan, France)top: http_server, nginx, jenkins
See the KEV-Exposure radar →Derived from Shodan data. Shodan data is owned by Shodan, which holds its copyright (© Shodan). EchelonGraph claims no ownership of it or copyright in it. Aggregate, host-redacted.

How it counts: every 12 hours, when Shodan query credits allow, the radar runs one Shodan query per tracked product, reads up to 100 ip:port services per query, and keeps a service when its banner version matches a CISA-KEV or high-EPSS CVE; a service is dropped when neither a search nor a Shodan InternetDB port re-check has refreshed it for 21 days. A re-check that finds the port still listed by Shodan InternetDB refreshes the service without re-reading the banner, so a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open. A count is a banner-version inference over a sample, not an exploit test and not an internet-wide census, and the unit is a service, not a machine: a machine answering on two ports counts twice.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
89
EG Risk 89/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high.
EPSS PROB
>99.9%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.5 HIGH.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
>99.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Attend at medium mission impactAttend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2023/10/10/http2-rapid-reset-vulnerability-cve-2023-44487 · https://blog.cloudflare.com/technical-breakdown-http2-rapid-reset-ddos-attack/ · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-44487

Published

October 10, 2023

Last Modified

October 14, 2026

Advisory Details (20)

Auto-updated Oct 29, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). Patch available. Sources: github_pr.
GitHub pull request

http: Fix CVE CVE-2023-44487

Fix merged in envoyproxy/envoy PR #30055 on 2023-10-10 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/pull/30055
Web page

HTTP/2 "Rapid Reset" DDoS Attack Disclosed By Google, Cloudflare & AWS - Phoronix

https://www.phoronix.com/news/HTTP2-Rapid-Reset-Attack
Web page

HTTP/2 Zero-Day vulnerability results in record-breaking DDoS attacks | Cloudflare Blog

https://blog.cloudflare.com/zero-day-rapid-reset-http2-record-breaking-ddos-attack/
Web page

The largest DDoS attack to date, peaking above 398M rps | Hacker News

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37831062
Web page

Google Cloud mitigated largest DDoS attack, peaking above 398 million rps | Google Cloud Blog

https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/google-cloud-mitigated-largest-ddos-attack-peaking-above-398-million-rps/
Web page

How it works: The novel HTTP/2 ‘Rapid Reset’ DDoS attack | Google Cloud Blog

https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/how-it-works-the-novel-http2-rapid-reset-ddos-attack
Web page

CVE-2023-44487 - HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Attack

https://aws.amazon.com/security/security-bulletins/AWS-2023-011/
Web page🟡 PoC Available

HTTP/2 Rapid Reset: deconstructing the record-breaking attack | Cloudflare Blog

https://blog.cloudflare.com/technical-breakdown-http2-rapid-reset-ddos-attack/
Web page

core/release-notes/6.0/6.0.23/6.0.23.md at e4613450ea0da7fd2fc6b61dfb2c1c1dec1ce9ec · dotnet/core · GitHub

https://github.com/dotnet/core/blob/e4613450ea0da7fd2fc6b61dfb2c1c1dec1ce9ec/release-notes/6.0/6.0.23/6.0.23.md?plain=1#L73
Web page

Biggest DDoSes of all time generated by protocol 0-day in HTTP/2 - Ars Technica

https://arstechnica.com/security/2023/10/how-ddosers-used-the-http-2-protocol-to-deliver-attacks-of-unprecedented-size/
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

CVE-2023-44487 - Red Hat Customer Portal

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2023-44487
Web page

oss-security - Re: CVE-2023-44487: HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack against many implementations

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/20/8
Web page

oss-security - CVE-2023-45802: Apache HTTP Server: HTTP/2 stream memory not reclaimed right away on RST

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/19/6
Web page

oss-security - Re: CVE-2023-44487: HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack against many implementations

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/18/8
Web page

oss-security - Vulnerability in Jenkins

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/18/4
Web page

oss-security - Re: CVE-2023-44487: HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack against many implementations

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/9
Web page

oss-security - Re: CVE-2023-44487: HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack against many implementations

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/4
Web page

oss-security - Re: CVE-2023-44487: HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack against many implementations

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/10/7
Web page

oss-security - CVE-2023-44487: HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack against many implementations

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/10/6

Patch Availability(42)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatmulticluster-engine/kube-rbac-proxy-mce-rhel9:17662743242026-01-15redhat
redhatrhacm2/kube-rbac-proxy-rhel9:v2.112025-12-17redhat
redhatmulticluster-engine/kube-rbac-proxy-mce-rhel9:v2.62025-12-17redhat
redhateap7-wildfly-0:7.1.12-2.GA_redhat_00002.1.ep7.el72025-09-25redhat
redhattomcat-1:10.1.36-1.el10_02025-05-13redhat
redhatdevspaces/udi-rhel8:3.15-52024-07-18redhat
redhatrhceph/rhceph-5-dashboard-rhel8:5-872024-06-26redhat
redhatceph-2:16.2.10-266.el8cp2024-06-26redhat
redhatrhceph/snmp-notifier-rhel9:1.2.1-572024-05-01redhat
redhathelm-0:3.13.2-35.el92024-04-18redhat
redhatopenshift4/ovirt-csi-driver-rhel8-operator:v4.15.0-202404030309.p0.ge9b0fa2.assembly.stream.el82024-04-16redhat
redhatnodejs:16-8090020240315081818.a75119d52024-03-20redhat
redhatrhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:1.1-972024-03-18redhat
redhatkube-descheduler-operator/kube-descheduler-rhel9-operator:v5.0-142024-03-06redhat
redhatrun-once-duration-override-operator/run-once-duration-override-rhel9-operator:v1.1-52024-02-28redhat
redhatopenshift4/ovirt-csi-driver-rhel9:v4.15.0-202401261531.p0.gb8d25ad.assembly.stream2024-02-27redhat
redhatopenshift-sandboxed-containers/osc-rhel9-operator:1.5.2-32024-02-15redhat
redhatjenkins-0:2.426.3.1706516352-3.el82024-02-12redhat
redhatalbo/aws-load-balancer-rhel8-operator:1.0.1-22024-01-30redhat
redhatmta/mta-cli-rhel9:7.0.0-442024-01-30redhat
redhatalbo/aws-load-balancer-rhel8-operator:1.1.1-12024-01-30redhat
redhatedo/external-dns-rhel8-operator:1.1.1-42024-01-29redhat
redhatedo/external-dns-rhel8-operator:1.0.1-62024-01-29redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-openshift-apiserver-rhel8:v4.13.0-202312040608.p0.g6c07330.assembly.stream2023-12-13redhat
redhatrhceph/rhceph-6-dashboard-rhel9:6-822023-12-12redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-gcp-cloud-controller-manager-rhel8:v4.14.0-202311300410.p0.g09e96a9.assembly.stream2023-12-12redhat
redhatopenshift-pipelines/pipelines-workingdirinit-rhel8:v1.10.6-102023-12-07redhat
redhatcontainer-native-virtualization/virt-artifacts-server-rhel9:v4.14.1-42023-12-07redhat
redhatopenshift-pipelines-client-0:1.10.6-11031.el82023-12-07redhat
redhatcri-o-0:1.25.5-2.rhaos4.12.git0217273.el82023-12-06redhat
gogolang.org/x/net @ 0.17.0 (fixes < 0.17.0)—ghsa
mavencom.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core @ 10.5.3 (fixes < 10.5.3)—ghsa
mavencom.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core_2.11—ghsa
mavenorg.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core @ 8.5.94 (fixes >= 8.5.0, < 8.5.94)—ghsa
mavenorg.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core @ 9.0.81 (fixes >= 9.0.0, < 9.0.81)—ghsa
mavenorg.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core @ 10.1.14 (fixes >= 10.0.0, < 10.1.14)—ghsa
mavenorg.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core @ 11.0.0-M12 (fixes >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.0-M12)—ghsa
mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.http2:http2-common @ 11.0.17 (fixes >= 11.0.0, < 11.0.17)—ghsa
mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.http2:http2-common @ 10.0.17 (fixes >= 10.0.0, < 10.0.17)—ghsa
mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.http2:http2-common @ 9.4.53 (fixes >= 9.3.0, < 9.4.53)—ghsa
mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.http2:jetty-http2-common @ 12.0.2 (fixes >= 12.0.0, < 12.0.2)—ghsa
swiftgithub.com/apple/swift-nio-http2 @ 1.28.0 (fixes < 1.28.0)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(50 across 18 ecosystems)
Debian:11(7)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
dnsdist1.5.1-3 ... 2.1.1-1 (45 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
grpc1.30.2-3 ... 1.82.0-1 (22 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
h2o2.2.5+dfsg2-10 ... 2.2.5+dfsg2-9 (10 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
haproxy—
  • every version up to 1.8.13-1: fixed in 1.8.13-1
—
jetty99.4.39-3 ... 9.4.50-4 (17 versions)
  • every version up to 9.4.50-4+deb11u1: fixed in 9.4.50-4+deb11u1
—
netty1:4.1.48-4, 1:4.1.48-4+deb11u1
  • every version up to 1:4.1.48-4+deb11u2: fixed in 1:4.1.48-4+deb11u2
—
nghttp21.43.0-1
  • every version up to 1.43.0-1+deb11u1: fixed in 1.43.0-1+deb11u1
—
Debian:12(7)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
dnsdist1.7.3-2 ... 2.1.2-1 (37 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
grpc1.51.1-3 ... 1.83.0-1 (12 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
h2o2.2.5+dfsg2-10 ... 2.2.5+dfsg2-9 (7 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
haproxy—
  • every version up to 1.8.13-1: fixed in 1.8.13-1
—
jetty99.4.50-4, 9.4.50-4+deb12u1
  • every version up to 9.4.50-4+deb12u2: fixed in 9.4.50-4+deb12u2
—
netty1:4.1.48-7
  • every version up to 1:4.1.48-7+deb12u1: fixed in 1:4.1.48-7+deb12u1
—
nghttp21.52.0-1
  • every version up to 1.52.0-1+deb12u1: fixed in 1.52.0-1+deb12u1
—
Debian:13(6)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
dnsdist—
  • every version up to 1.8.2-2: fixed in 1.8.2-2
—
grpc1.51.1-6 ... 1.83.0-1 (7 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
haproxy—
  • every version up to 1.8.13-1: fixed in 1.8.13-1
—
jetty9—
  • every version up to 9.4.53-1: fixed in 9.4.53-1
—
netty—
  • every version up to 1:4.1.48-8: fixed in 1:4.1.48-8
—
nghttp2—
  • every version up to 1.57.0-1: fixed in 1.57.0-1
—
Debian:14(6)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
dnsdist—
  • every version up to 1.8.2-2: fixed in 1.8.2-2
—
grpc1.51.1-6 ... 1.83.0-1 (7 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
haproxy—
  • every version up to 1.8.13-1: fixed in 1.8.13-1
—
jetty9—
  • every version up to 9.4.53-1: fixed in 9.4.53-1
—
netty—
  • every version up to 1:4.1.48-8: fixed in 1:4.1.48-8
—
nghttp2—
  • every version up to 1.57.0-1: fixed in 1.57.0-1
—
Debian:10(4)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
h2o2.2.5+dfsg2-2, 2.2.5+dfsg2-2+deb10u1
  • every version up to 2.2.5+dfsg2-2+deb10u2: fixed in 2.2.5+dfsg2-2+deb10u2
—
jetty99.4.15-1 ... 9.4.50-4 (40 versions)
  • every version up to 9.4.50-4+deb10u1: fixed in 9.4.50-4+deb10u1
—
netty1:4.1.33-1, 1:4.1.33-1+deb10u1, 1:4.1.33-1+deb10u2, 1:4.1.33-1+deb10u3
  • every version up to 1:4.1.33-1+deb10u4: fixed in 1:4.1.33-1+deb10u4
—
nghttp21.36.0-2, 1.36.0-2+deb10u1
  • every version up to 1.36.0-2+deb10u2: fixed in 1.36.0-2+deb10u2
—
Maven(4)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core3.0.0-RC1
  • every version up to 10.5.3: fixed in 10.5.3
—
com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core_2.1110.0.0 ... 3.0.0-RC1 (58 versions)
  • every version through 10.1.15: no fix on record
—
com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core_2.1210.0.0 ... 10.5.2 (59 versions)
  • every version up to 10.5.3: fixed in 10.5.3
—
com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core_2.1310.1.10 ... 10.5.2 (31 versions)
  • every version up to 10.5.3: fixed in 10.5.3
—
Alpine:v3.15(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
lighttpd—
  • every version up to 1.4.73-r0: fixed in 1.4.73-r0
—
nghttp2—
  • every version up to 1.46.0-r2: fixed in 1.46.0-r2
—
Alpine:v3.16(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
lighttpd—
  • every version up to 1.4.73-r0: fixed in 1.4.73-r0
—
nghttp2—
  • every version up to 1.47.0-r2: fixed in 1.47.0-r2
—
Alpine:v3.17(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
lighttpd—
  • every version up to 1.4.73-r0: fixed in 1.4.73-r0
—
nghttp2—
  • every version up to 1.51.0-r2: fixed in 1.51.0-r2
—
Alpine:v3.21(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nghttp2—
  • every version up to 1.57.0-r0: fixed in 1.57.0-r0
—
nginx—
  • 1.9.5 up to 1.24.0-r12: fixed in 1.24.0-r12
—
Alpine:v3.18(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nghttp2—
  • every version up to 1.57.0-r0: fixed in 1.57.0-r0
—
Alpine:v3.19(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nghttp2—
  • every version up to 1.57.0-r0: fixed in 1.57.0-r0
—
Alpine:v3.20(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nghttp2—
  • every version up to 1.57.0-r0: fixed in 1.57.0-r0
—
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nghttp2—
  • every version up to 1.57.0-r0: fixed in 1.57.0-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nghttp2—
  • every version up to 1.57.0-r0: fixed in 1.57.0-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nghttp2—
  • every version up to 1.57.0-r0: fixed in 1.57.0-r0
—
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang.org/x/net—
  • every version up to 0.17.0: fixed in 0.17.0
—
Swift(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/apple/swift-nio-http2—1.28.0 (one range)—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(20)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 102× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 920 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 820 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 08:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qppj-fm5r-hxr3 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  2. 2026-11-01 08:18 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-11-01 05:42 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-11-01 05:42 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-31 06:28 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-31 06:28 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-30 07:15 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-30 07:15 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-29 08:02 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-29 08:02 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-28 08:48 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-28 08:48 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS >99.9% · 99th percentile
  14. 2026-10-27 09:34 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-27 09:34 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-26 10:20 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-25 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-25 11:07 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-25 11:07 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-24 11:54 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-24 11:54 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-23 12:41 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-23 12:41 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-22 13:26 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-22 13:26 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-21 14:10 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-21 14:10 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS >99.9% · 99th percentile
  4. 2026-10-20 14:56 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-20 14:56 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-19 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-19 15:41 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-18 16:26 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-18 07:49 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-17 21:48 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-17 21:48 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-16 22:34 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-16 22:34 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-15 23:18 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-15 23:18 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-15 00:03 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-15 00:03 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-14 05:24 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-14 05:24 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-13 06:09 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-12 18:18 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-12 06:55 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-12 02:42 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-11 22:31 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-11 21:44 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-11 18:20 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-11 18:20 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-11 14:10 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-11 14:10 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-11 09:59 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-11 05:49 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-11 01:38 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-10 21:27 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-10 17:14 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-10 13:04 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-10 08:53 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-10 04:43 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-10 00:33 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-09 20:23 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-09 16:13 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-09 12:03 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-09 07:52 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-09 03:41 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-08 23:31 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-08 19:21 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-08 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-08 11:00 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-08 06:50 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-08 02:40 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-07 22:30 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-07 18:19 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-07 14:09 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-07 09:58 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-07 05:48 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-07 01:38 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-06 21:28 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-06 17:18 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-06 13:07 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-06 08:57 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-06 04:47 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-06 00:37 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-05 20:26 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-05 16:16 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-05 12:06 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-05 07:55 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-05 03:45 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-04 23:35 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-04 19:25 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-04 15:14 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-04 11:02 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-04 06:51 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-10-04 02:42 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-03 22:32 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-03 18:22 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-10-03 14:10 UTCVendor advisory

Publicly available exploits

(12 references, 10 shown)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Exploit-DB entry, 9 GitHub PoCs), as are 2 GitHub checker repositories. A GitHub repository named or described as a checker or scanner checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • GitHub PoCtpirate/cve-2023-44487-POC
    Published Dec 14, 2025

    poc for the rst dos attack discovered in 2023

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-52426
    Published Sep 16, 2025

    HTTP/2 2.0 - Denial Of Service (DOS)

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCmoften/CVE-2023-44487-HTTP-2-Rapid-Reset-Attack
    Published Apr 14, 2025

    HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Exploit PoC

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCthreatlabindonesia/CVE-2023-44487-HTTP-2-Rapid-Reset-Exploit-PoC
    Published Dec 3, 2024
    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCnxenon/cve-2023-44487
    Published Nov 10, 2023

    Examples for Implementing cve-2023-44487 ( HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Attack ) Concept

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub checkerndrscodes/http2-rst-stream-attacker
    Published Nov 8, 2023

    Highly configurable tool to check a server's vulnerability against CVE-2023-44487 by rapidly sending HEADERS and RST_STREAM frames and documenting the server's responses.

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCReToCode/golang-CVE-2023-44487
    Published Oct 25, 2023
    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCstudiogangster/CVE-2023-44487
    Published Oct 16, 2023

    A python based exploit to test out rapid reset attack (CVE-2023-44487)

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCsecengjeff/rapidresetclient
    Published Oct 13, 2023

    Tool for testing mitigations and exposure to Rapid Reset DDoS (CVE-2023-44487)

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCAppsynergy-io/CVE-2023-44487
    Published Oct 11, 2023

    Proof of concept for DoS exploit

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2023-44487?
CVE-2023-44487 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 10, 2023. The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2023-44487 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2023-44487 was published on October 10, 2023. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2023-44487 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2023-44487 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on October 10, 2023, affecting IETF HTTP/2. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. A fix is available. Apply it.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-44487?
CVE-2023-44487 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
Which products are affected by CVE-2023-44487?
CVE-2023-44487 affects IETF HTTP/2. The affected packages EchelonGraph has on record, with version ranges, are listed in the Affected Packages section of this page.
How do I remediate CVE-2023-44487?
A fix for CVE-2023-44487 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2023-44487 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2023-44487

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-44487?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.