CVE-2022-49700

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2025-02-27. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2022-54535 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-p247-4v6m-f77m (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/slub: add missing TID updates on slab deactivation

The fastpath in slab_alloc_node() assumes that c->slab is stable as long as the TID stays the same. However, two places in __slab_alloc() currently don't update the TID when deactivating the CPU slab.

If multiple operations race the right way, this could lead to an object getting lost; or, in an even more unlikely situation, it could even lead to an object being freed onto the wrong slab's freelist, messing up the inuse counter and eventually causing a page to be freed to the page allocator while it still contains slab objects.

(I haven't actually tested these cases though, this is just based on looking at the code. Writing testcases for this stuff seems like it'd be a pain...)

The race leading to state inconsistency is (all operations on the same CPU and kmem_cache):

  • task A: begin do_slab_free():
  • read TID
  • read pcpu freelist (==NULL)
  • check slab == c->slab (true)
  • [PREEMPT A->B]
  • task B: begin slab_alloc_node():
  • fastpath fails (c->freelist is NULL)
  • enter __slab_alloc()
  • slub_get_cpu_ptr() (disables preemption)
  • enter ___slab_alloc()
  • take local_lock_irqsave()
  • read c->freelist as NULL
  • get_freelist() returns NULL
  • write c->slab = NULL
  • drop local_unlock_irqrestore()
  • goto new_slab
  • slub_percpu_partial() is NULL
  • get_partial() returns NULL
  • slub_put_cpu_ptr() (enables preemption)
  • [PREEMPT B->A]
  • task A: finish do_slab_free():
  • this_cpu_cmpxchg_double() succeeds()
  • [CORRUPT STATE: c->slab==NULL, c->freelist!=NULL]

From there, the object on c->freelist will get lost if task B is allowed to continue from here: It will proceed to the retry_load_slab label, set c->slab, then jump to load_freelist, which clobbers c->freelist.

But if we instead continue as follows, we get worse corruption:

  • task A: run __slab_free() on object from other struct slab:
  • CPU_PARTIAL_FREE case (slab was on no list, is now on pcpu partial)
  • task A: run slab_alloc_node() with NUMA node constraint:
  • fastpath fails (c->slab is NULL)
  • call __slab_alloc()
  • slub_get_cpu_ptr() (disables preemption)
  • enter ___slab_alloc()
  • c->slab is NULL: goto new_slab
  • slub_percpu_partial() is non-NULL
  • set c->slab to slub_percpu_partial(c)
  • [CORRUPT STATE: c->slab points to slab-1, c->freelist has objects
from slab-2]
  • goto redo
  • node_match() fails
  • goto deactivate_slab
  • existing c->freelist is passed into deactivate_slab()
  • inuse count of slab-1 is decremented to account for object from
slab-2

At this point, the inuse count of slab-1 is 1 lower than it should be. This means that if we free all allocated objects in slab-1 except for one, SLUB will think that slab-1 is completely unused, and may free its page, leading to use-after-free.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
21st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

February 26, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Aug 5, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

mm/slub: add missing TID updates on slab deactivation - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eeaa345e128515135ccb864c04482180c08e3259
Web page

mm/slub: add missing TID updates on slab deactivation - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/197e257da473c725dfe47759c3ee02f2398d8ea5
Web page

mm/slub: add missing TID updates on slab deactivation - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0515cc9b6b24877f59b222ade704bfaa42caa2a6
Web page

mm/slub: add missing TID updates on slab deactivation - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6c32496964da0dc230cea763a0e934b2e02dabd5
Web page

mm/slub: add missing TID updates on slab deactivation - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e7e3e90d671078455a3a08189f89d85b3da2de9e
Web page

mm/slub: add missing TID updates on slab deactivation - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e2b2f0e2e34d71ae6c2a1114fd3c525930e84bc7
Web page

mm/slub: add missing TID updates on slab deactivation - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d6a597450e686d4c6388bd3cdcb17224b4dae7f0
Web page

mm/slub: add missing TID updates on slab deactivation - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/308c6d0e1f200fd26c71270c6e6bfcf0fc6ff082

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-49700(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-553.el8_102024-05-22redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-284.11.1.el9_22023-05-09redhat
linuxKernel @ 4.9.323 (fixes >=3.1.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (17 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.136-1: fixed in 5.10.136-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.18.14-1: fixed in 5.18.14-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.18.14-1: fixed in 5.18.14-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.18.14-1: fixed in 5.18.14-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 206 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 107 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  3. 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  5. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  6. 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  7. 2026-10-27 22:01 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-27 22:01 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-27 22:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p247-4v6m-f77m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  10. 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  11. 2026-10-26 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 17:54 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  14. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  15. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  16. 2026-10-22 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  18. 2026-10-21 05:35 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-21 05:35 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-21 05:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p247-4v6m-f77m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  21. 2026-10-20 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  22. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  23. 2026-10-19 11:25 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  25. 2026-10-18 08:19 UTCEG score recompute
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  2. 2026-10-16 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  3. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  4. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  5. 2026-10-13 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  6. 2026-10-12 18:41 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  8. 2026-10-11 22:05 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  10. 2026-10-10 19:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  11. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  12. 2026-10-08 17:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  13. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  14. 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  15. 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  16. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  17. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  18. 2026-09-30 16:12 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  20. 2026-09-27 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  21. 2026-09-26 19:03 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-09-26 15:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  23. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  24. 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  25. 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  26. 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  27. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  28. 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  29. 2026-09-15 03:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  30. 2026-09-13 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  31. 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  32. 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  33. 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  34. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  35. 2026-09-07 04:18 UTCOSV refresh
  36. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  37. 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  38. 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  39. 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  40. 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  41. 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  42. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  43. 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  44. 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  45. 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  46. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  47. 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  48. 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  49. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  50. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  51. 2026-08-20 14:01 UTCOSV refresh
  52. 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  53. 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  54. 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  55. 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  56. 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  57. 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  58. 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  59. 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  60. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  61. 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  62. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  63. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  64. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  65. 2026-08-05 09:31 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-05 09:31 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-05 09:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p247-4v6m-f77m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  68. 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  69. 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  70. 2026-08-04 09:45 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-08-04 09:45 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-04 09:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p247-4v6m-f77m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  73. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  74. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-49700?
CVE-2022-49700 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on February 26, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/slub: add missing TID updates on slab deactivation The fastpath in slab_alloc_node() assumes that c->slab is stable as long as the TID stays the same. However, two places in __slab_alloc() currently don't update the TID when…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2022-49700 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2022-49700 was published on February 26, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2022-49700 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-49700 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (21st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-49700?
CVE-2022-49700 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-49700?
A fix for CVE-2022-49700 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2022-49700 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-49700

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-49700?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.