CVE-2022-49700

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2025-02-27. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
7.8
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/slub: add missing TID updates on slab deactivation

The fastpath in slab_alloc_node() assumes that c->slab is stable as long as the TID stays the same. However, two places in __slab_alloc() currently don't update the TID when deactivating the CPU slab.

If multiple operations race the right way, this could lead to an object getting lost; or, in an even more unlikely situation, it could even lead to an object being freed onto the wrong slab's freelist, messing up the inuse counter and eventually causing a page to be freed to the page allocator while it still contains slab objects.

(I haven't actually tested these cases though, this is just based on looking at the code. Writing testcases for this stuff seems like it'd be a pain...)

The race leading to state inconsistency is (all operations on the same CPU and kmem_cache):

  • task A: begin do_slab_free():
  • read TID
  • read pcpu freelist (==NULL)
  • check slab == c->slab (true)
  • [PREEMPT A->B]
  • task B: begin slab_alloc_node():
  • fastpath fails (c->freelist is NULL)
  • enter __slab_alloc()
  • slub_get_cpu_ptr() (disables preemption)
  • enter ___slab_alloc()
  • take local_lock_irqsave()
  • read c->freelist as NULL
  • get_freelist() returns NULL
  • write c->slab = NULL
  • drop local_unlock_irqrestore()
  • goto new_slab
  • slub_percpu_partial() is NULL
  • get_partial() returns NULL
  • slub_put_cpu_ptr() (enables preemption)
  • [PREEMPT B->A]
  • task A: finish do_slab_free():
  • this_cpu_cmpxchg_double() succeeds()
  • [CORRUPT STATE: c->slab==NULL, c->freelist!=NULL]

From there, the object on c->freelist will get lost if task B is allowed to continue from here: It will proceed to the retry_load_slab label, set c->slab, then jump to load_freelist, which clobbers c->freelist.

But if we instead continue as follows, we get worse corruption:

  • task A: run __slab_free() on object from other struct slab:
  • CPU_PARTIAL_FREE case (slab was on no list, is now on pcpu partial)
  • task A: run slab_alloc_node() with NUMA node constraint:
  • fastpath fails (c->slab is NULL)
  • call __slab_alloc()
  • slub_get_cpu_ptr() (disables preemption)
  • enter ___slab_alloc()
  • c->slab is NULL: goto new_slab
  • slub_percpu_partial() is non-NULL
  • set c->slab to slub_percpu_partial(c)
  • [CORRUPT STATE: c->slab points to slab-1, c->freelist has objects
from slab-2]
  • goto redo
  • node_match() fails
  • goto deactivate_slab
  • existing c->freelist is passed into deactivate_slab()
  • inuse count of slab-1 is decremented to account for object from
slab-2

At this point, the inuse count of slab-1 is 1 lower than it should be. This means that if we free all allocated objects in slab-1 except for one, SLUB will think that slab-1 is completely unused, and may free its page, leading to use-after-free.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EPSS
20.5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

February 26, 2025

Last Modified

March 25, 2025

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-49700(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-553.el8_102024-05-22redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-284.11.1.el9_22023-05-09redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 46× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 68 more
  1. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-07 09:21 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-18 20:35 UTCOSV refresh
  30. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-30 10:41 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-05-30 10:41 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-05-30 10:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-29 13:35 UTCOSV refresh

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-49700?
CVE-2022-49700 is a high vulnerability published on February 26, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/slub: add missing TID updates on slab deactivation The fastpath in slaballocnode() assumes that c->slab is stable as long as the TID stays the same. However, two places in slab_alloc() currently don't update the TID when…
When was CVE-2022-49700 disclosed?
CVE-2022-49700 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on February 26, 2025, with the most recent update on March 25, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2022-49700 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-49700 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 20.5% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-49700?
CVE-2022-49700 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-49700?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2022-49700, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2022-49700

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-49700?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.