The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd).
CVE-2022-1292
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2022-05-04. NVD baseline CVSS 7.3; sources differ by 2.5.
Also known asEUVD-2022-24621 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 83%
- Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.3
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 92EG Risk 92/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation83% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 83%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 83% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
May 3, 2022
Last Modified
October 14, 2026
Advisory Details (6)
Auto-updated Oct 14, 2026[SECURITY] Fedora 35 Update: openssl-1.1.1o-1.fc35 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZNU5M7BXMML26G3GPYKFGQYPQDRSNKDD/[SECURITY] Fedora 36 Update: openssl1.1-1.1.1o-1.fc36 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VX4KWHPMKYJL6ZLW4M5IU7E5UV5ZWJQU/[SECURITY] [DSA 5139-1] openssl security update
https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5139[SECURITY] [DLA 3008-1] openssl security update
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00019.htmlVendor Advisories for CVE-2022-1292(13)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- CVE-2022-1292Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)
CVE-2022-1292
- RHSA-2023:6818Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Satellite 6.14 security and bug fix update
- RHSA-2023:5982Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Satellite Client security and bug fix update
- RHSA-2023:5980Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Satellite 6.11.5.6 async security update
- RHSA-2023:5979Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Satellite 6.12.5.2 Async Security Update
- RHSA-2023:5931Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Satellite 6.13.5 Async Security Update
- RHSA-2022:8917Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat JBoss Web Server 5.7.1 release and security update
- RHSA-2022:8913Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat JBoss Web Server 5.7.1 release and security update
- +5 more
Patch Availability(12)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | qemu-efi (0~20160408.ffea0a2c-2ubuntu0.2+esm3) @ xenial | 2026-11-02 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | libssl1.0.0 (1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm3) @ xenial | 2026-11-02 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | openssl (1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm10) @ trusty | 2026-11-02 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | libssl3 (3.0.2-0ubuntu1.1) @ jammy | 2026-11-02 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | nodejs-doc (12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1) @ jammy | 2026-11-02 | ubuntu |
| redhat | puppet-agent-0:7.26.0-3.el8sat | 2023-11-08 | redhat |
| redhat | puppet-agent-0:7.26.0-3.el9sat | 2023-10-20 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl | 2022-12-12 | redhat |
| redhat | jws5-tomcat-native-0:1.2.31-11.redhat_11.el9jws | 2022-12-12 | redhat |
| redhat | jbcs-httpd24-openssl-1:1.1.1k-13.el7jbcs | 2022-12-08 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 | 2022-08-30 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-1:1.1.1k-7.el8_6 | 2022-08-03 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(6 across 6 ecosystems)
Debian:10(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | 1.1.1c-1 ... 1.1.1n-0+deb10u1 (23 versions) |
| — |
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | 1.1.1k-1 ... 1.1.1n-0+deb11u1 (7 versions) |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:9(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | 1.1.0f-3 ... 1.1.0l-1~deb9u5 (19 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(5)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 24× in last 7d / 80× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 98 of 181 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 83 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 01:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 01:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-02 01:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-11-01 01:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 01:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-01 01:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-31 01:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 01:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-31 01:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-30 01:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 01:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 01:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-29 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-29 01:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 01:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 01:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-28 02:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 02:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 02:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-27 02:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 02:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 02:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-25 22:30 UTCVendor advisory
Show 73 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-25 22:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-25 18:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-24 22:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 22:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 22:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-23 22:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 22:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 22:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-22 23:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 23:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 23:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 23:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 23:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-20 23:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 23:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 23:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-19 23:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 23:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 23:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-18 23:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 23:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 23:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-18 08:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 22:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 22:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-17 22:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-16 22:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 22:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 22:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-15 19:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 19:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 19:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-14 13:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 13:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-14 12:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 12:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-13 22:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 22:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 22:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-12 19:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 19:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjmp-vmxc-7p8r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-12 19:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-11 23:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-02 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-24 22:46 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-22 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-05 14:56 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(5 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (5 GitHub PoCs). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- GitHub PoCund3sc0n0c1d0/CVE-2022-1292Published Sep 13, 2022
Automation to validate the impact of the vulnerability CVE-2022-1292 on a specific system.
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCgreek0x0/CVE-2022-1292Published Sep 1, 2022
OpenSSL
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCalcaparra/CVE-2022-1292Published May 30, 2022
CVE-2022-1292 OpenSSL c_rehash Vulnerability - POC
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCrama291041610/CVE-2022-1292Published May 30, 2022
CVE-2022-1292 OpenSSL c_rehash Vulnerability
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCli8u99/CVE-2022-1292Published May 24, 2022
CVE-2022-1292
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:9:openssl
- CVE-2022-0778NVD 7.5EG 8.7EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2021-23840NVD 7.5EG 8.1EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2021-3712NVD 7.4EG 8.0EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2021-23841EG 5.9EPSS p94MEDIUM
- CVE-2020-1971EG 5.9EPSS p94MEDIUM
- CVE-2019-1551EG 5.3EPSS p97MEDIUM
- CVE-2019-1547EG 4.7MEDIUM
- CVE-2019-1563EG 3.7EPSS p90LOW
- CVE-2018-0732NVD 7.5EG 8.0EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2019-1543EG 7.4EPSS p93HIGH
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2022:5818 · redhat:RHSA-2023:5931 · redhat:RHSA-2023:5979
- CVE-2022-2068NVD 7.3EG 9.8EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2023-44487NVD 7.5EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2023-39325EG 7.5EPSS p90HIGH
- CVE-2022-47318EG 8.0HIGH
- CVE-2022-46648EG 8.0HIGH
- CVE-2022-3874NVD 8.0EG 9.1CRITICAL
- CVE-2023-0118EG 9.1CRITICAL
- CVE-2023-0462EG 8.0HIGH
- CVE-2022-2097NVD 5.3EG 7.5EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2022-1473EG 7.5EPSS p92HIGH
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-78
- CVE-2021-42165EG 8.8EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2021-43164EG 8.8EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2022-20799NVD 4.7EG 7.2HIGH
- CVE-2022-20801NVD 4.7EG 7.2HIGH
- CVE-2021-41739EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-46422EG 9.8EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-46441EG 8.8EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2022-22454EG 7.8HIGH
- CVE-2021-42969EG 8.8HIGH
- CVE-2022-1440EG 9.8EPSS p90CRITICAL
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2022-1292?
When was CVE-2022-1292 made public?
Is CVE-2022-1292 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-1292?
How do I remediate CVE-2022-1292?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-1292
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-1292?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.