CVE-2021-3712

HIGHNVD 7.47.4
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 7.4 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 50.4%, top 1% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
Elevated
7.4
EchelonGraph verdictPatch this weekExploitation is likely or a public exploit exists.
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 50%
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 50%CVSS: 7.4Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y).

CVSS v3
7.4
EG Score
7.4(medium)
EG Risk
EPSS
98.8%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 24, 2021

Last Modified

April 16, 2026

Patch Availability(11)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulibssl-doc (1.1.1j-1ubuntu3.5) @ hirsute2026-05-22ubuntu
ubuntuqemu-efi-arm (2022.02-3ubuntu0.22.04.4) @ jammy2026-05-22ubuntu
ubuntulibssl1.0-dev (1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.7) @ bionic2026-05-22ubuntu
ubuntuovmf (2020.11-4ubuntu0.1) @ hirsute2026-05-22ubuntu
ubuntuopenssl (1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm1) @ xenial2026-05-22ubuntu
redhatopenssl-1:1.0.2k-23.el7_92022-01-11redhat
redhatopenssl-1:1.1.1k-5.el8_52021-12-21redhat
redhatjws5-tomcat-vault-0:1.1.8-4.Final_redhat_00004.1.el8jws2021-11-30redhat
redhatpatch2021-11-30redhat
redhatjbcs-httpd24-openssl-pkcs11-0:0.4.10-22.jbcs.el72021-11-10redhat
redhatopenssl2021-11-10redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
crates.io(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl-src111.16.0

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(8)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 28× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 118 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-22 22:49 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-13 22:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-13 22:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-11 12:52 UTCOSV refresh
  13. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-09 19:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-08 15:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-02 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-27 03:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-27 03:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-22 19:35 UTCOSV refresh
  5. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-15 17:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-14 23:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-14 23:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-10 22:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-10 22:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-10 13:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-05 22:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-05 10:00 UTCOSV refresh
  34. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-05-29 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-05-26 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-05-26 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-05-22 21:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-05-22 21:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-22 21:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-22 21:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-22 21:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-22 21:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-22 21:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-22 06:47 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-05-22 06:47 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-05-21 22:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-21 22:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-20 11:21 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2021-3712?
CVE-2021-3712 is a high vulnerability published on August 24, 2021. ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0)…
When was CVE-2021-3712 disclosed?
CVE-2021-3712 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 24, 2021, with the most recent update on April 16, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2021-3712 actively exploited?
CVE-2021-3712 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 98.8% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-3712?
CVE-2021-3712 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.4 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2021-3712?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2021-3712, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-3712

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-3712?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.