golang.org/x/crypto before v0.0.0-20200220183623-bac4c82f6975 for Go allows a panic during signature verification in the golang.org/x/crypto/ssh package. A client can attack an SSH server that accepts public keys. Also, a server can attack any SSH client.
CVE-2020-9283
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2021-05-18. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2021-1059 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-ffhg-7mh4-33c4 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 50EG Risk 50/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 21%
- EPSS %ILE
- 97th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 21% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
February 20, 2020
Last Modified
November 21, 2024
References (6)
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://packetstormsecurity.com/files/156480/Go-SSH-0.0.2-Denial-Of-Service.htmlExploit · Third Party Advisory · VDB Entry
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/golang-announce/3L45YRc91SY
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/10/msg00014.htmlMailing List · Third Party Advisory
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/11/msg00027.htmlMailing List · Third Party Advisory
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/11/msg00031.htmlMailing List · Third Party Advisory
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00017.html
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2020-9283(19)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2021:1129Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat 3scale API Management 2.10.0 security update and release
- RHSA-2021:0799Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Virtualization 2.6.0 security and bug fix update
- RHSA-2020:4298Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.6.1 image security update
- RHSA-2020:4264Red Hat Product SecurityLow
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.3.40 security and bug fix update
- RHSA-2020:3809Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.3.38 container image security update
- RHSA-2020:3414Red Hat Product SecurityLow
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.5.5 security update
- RHSA-2020:3372Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3scale-istio-adapter-rhel8-container security update
- RHSA-2020:3369Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh security update
- +11 more
Patch Availability(17)
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(9 across 7 ecosystems)
Debian:9(3)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-go.crypto | 1:0.0~git20170407.0.55a552f+REALLY.0.0~git20161012.0.5f31782-1 |
| — |
| packer | 0.10.2+dfsg-6 |
| — |
| restic | 0.3.3-1 |
| — |
Debian:10(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-go.crypto | 1:0.0~git20181203.505ab14-1 |
| — |
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-go.crypto | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-go.crypto | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-go.crypto | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-go.crypto | — |
| — |
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang.org/x/crypto | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 96 of 190 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 94 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-11-01 08:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffhg-7mh4-33c4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-11-01 08:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-29 05:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 05:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-25 18:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-24 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-21 11:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 11:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-20 09:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-18 09:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
Show 71 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-12 19:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 23:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-02 16:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-27 09:32 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-22 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-07 18:51 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-21 04:14 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-19 17:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:40 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-05 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
- 2026-07-23 01:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 21% · 97th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(2 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Exploit-DB entry, 1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- GitHub PoCbrompwnie/CVE-2020-9283Published Jun 2, 2020
Exploit for CVE-2020-9283 based on Go
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-48121Published Feb 24, 2020
Go SSH servers 0.0.2 - Denial of Service (PoC)
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:10:golang-go.crypto · Debian:11:golang-go.crypto
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2020:3369 · redhat:RHSA-2020:2412 · redhat:RHSA-2021:1129
- CVE-2020-14040EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2020-11023NVD 6.9EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-8203EG 7.4EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2020-11022NVD 6.9EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-11358NVD 6.1EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-8558NVD 5.4EG 8.8HIGH
- CVE-2019-11254EG 6.5MEDIUM
- CVE-2019-11252EG 5.9MEDIUM
- CVE-2019-14836EG 8.8HIGH
- CVE-2020-7662NVD 7.5EG 8.2HIGH
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2020-9283?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2020-9283 published?
Is CVE-2020-9283 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2020-9283?
How do I remediate CVE-2020-9283?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2020-9283
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2020-9283?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.