CVE-2026-39830

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-06-25. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 9.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory
Trending — Patch released this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-31397 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-vgwf-h737-ff37 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A malicious SSH peer could send unsolicited global request responses to fill an internal buffer, blocking the connection's read loop. The blocked goroutine could not be released by calling Close(), resulting in a resource leak per connection. Unsolicited global responses are now discarded.

CVSS v3
9.1
EG Score
9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
56
EG Risk 56/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity91% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
52nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.1 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 22, 2026

Last Modified

September 18, 2026

Advisory Details (10)

Auto-updated Sep 15, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:36319
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:36207
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:36199
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:35833
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29455
Web page

GO-2026-5017 - Go Packages

https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-5017
Web page

x/crypto/ssh: client can cause server deadlock on unexpected responses · Issue #79564 · golang/go · GitHub

https://go.dev/issue/79564

Patch Availability(31)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder:17929743682026-10-27redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder:17918738062026-10-22redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder:17918374292026-10-22redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder-rhel9:17913731292026-10-15redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder-rhel9:17908300362026-10-15redhat
redhatcert-manager/jetstack-cert-manager-rhel9:17913710692026-10-13redhat
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-operator-rhel9:17917882872026-10-13redhat
redhatrhosp-rhel9/osp-director-operator:17909601482026-10-12redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder-rhel9:17906331932026-10-08redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder-rhel9:17906101592026-10-07redhat
redhatcompliance/openshift-security-profiles-rhel8-operator:17906230302026-10-06redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-data-science-pipelines-argo-workflowcontroller-rhel9:17901301732026-09-30redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder-rhel9:17899877772026-09-29redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder-rhel9:17898853242026-09-29redhat
redhatmulticluster-engine/cluster-api-provider-kubevirt-rhel9:17901436942026-09-28redhat
redhatopenshift-logging/cluster-logging-rhel9-operator:17896591662026-09-23redhat
redhatpodman-6:5.8.2-7.el9_82026-09-22redhat
redhatquay/quay-rhel8:17885938432026-09-22redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-powervs-block-csi-driver-rhel9:17894654142026-09-22redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-powervs-block-csi-driver-rhel9:17889289032026-09-15redhat
redhatpodman-5:5.4.0-22.el9_6.52026-09-14redhat
redhatopenshift-logging/cluster-logging-rhel9-operator:17884395052026-09-10redhat
redhatoadp/oadp-velero-rhel9:17888604612026-09-09redhat
redhatrhosp-rhel8/osp-director-operator:17883545862026-09-09redhat
redhatcluster-observability-operator/cluster-observability-rhel9-operator:17875936372026-08-31redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-trainer-rhel9:17870890492026-08-27redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-ovn-kubernetes-rhel9:17869553162026-08-25redhat
redhatoadp/oadp-velero-rhel9:17869445402026-08-25redhat
redhatmulticluster-engine/hypershift-addon-rhel9-operator:17869120062026-08-19redhat
redhatcert-manager/jetstack-cert-manager-rhel9:17866138052026-08-13redhat
gogolang.org/x/crypto @ 0.52.0 (fixes < 0.52.0)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-go.crypto1:0.0~git20201221.eec23a3-1 ... 1:0.53.0-1 (40 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-go.crypto1:0.10.0-1 ... 1:0.56.0-1 (36 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-go.crypto1:0.25.0-1 ... 1:0.56.0-1 (21 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-go.crypto1:0.25.0-1 ... 1:0.52.0-1~bpo13+1 (16 versions)
  • every version up to 1:0.52.0-1: fixed in 1:0.52.0-1
—
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang.org/x/crypto—
  • every version up to 0.52.0: fixed in 0.52.0
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(25)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 78× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 514 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 415 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 13:08 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-01 13:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vgwf-h737-ff37 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  4. 2026-11-01 07:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vgwf-h737-ff37 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  5. 2026-11-01 07:52 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-31 12:09 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-31 12:09 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-30 11:11 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-30 11:11 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-29 10:15 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-29 10:15 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-28 09:18 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-28 09:18 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-27 07:44 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-27 07:44 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-26 04:07 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-26 04:07 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-25 14:31 UTCEG score recompute
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-25 03:08 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-25 03:08 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  4. 2026-10-24 02:12 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-24 02:12 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  7. 2026-10-23 01:14 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-23 01:14 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  10. 2026-10-22 00:15 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-22 00:15 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  13. 2026-10-20 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-20 23:16 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  16. 2026-10-19 22:20 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-19 22:20 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 21:10 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-18 21:10 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 03:43 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-17 20:12 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 20:12 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  26. 2026-10-16 19:13 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-16 19:13 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  29. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  30. 2026-10-15 16:25 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-10-15 16:25 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  33. 2026-10-14 10:37 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-14 10:37 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  36. 2026-10-13 09:08 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-13 09:08 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  39. 2026-10-12 16:10 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-12 08:09 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-11 19:52 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-10-11 17:05 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-10-11 14:32 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  45. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  46. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  47. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  48. 2026-10-08 06:24 UTCOSV refresh
  49. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  50. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  51. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  52. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  53. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  54. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  55. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  56. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  57. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  58. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  59. 2026-09-26 00:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  60. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  61. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  62. 2026-09-18 12:19 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-18 12:19 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  65. 2026-09-17 12:11 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-17 12:11 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  68. 2026-09-16 13:43 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-09-16 12:21 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-09-16 12:21 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  72. 2026-09-15 12:30 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-15 12:13 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-15 12:13 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-39830?
CVE-2026-39830 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 22, 2026. A malicious SSH peer could send unsolicited global request responses to fill an internal buffer, blocking the connection's read loop. The blocked goroutine could not be released by calling Close(), resulting in a resource leak per connection. Unsolicited global responses are now discarded.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-39830 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-39830 was published on May 22, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 18, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-39830 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-39830 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (52nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-39830?
CVE-2026-39830 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.1 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-39830?
A fix for CVE-2026-39830 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-39830 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-39830

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-39830?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.