CVE-2026-92940

CRITICALPre-NVD 10.010.0
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 10.0 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-10-01. A secondary CVSS source baseline 10.0; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — Patch released this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-81590 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-5843-9mh5-hhgw (GitHub Security Advisories) · GHSA-h85j-hv3c-qfgq (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

10.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 10.0Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

vm2 versions 3.11.3 through 3.11.6 expose the host process's real https.globalAgent to sandboxed code when a NodeVM is explicitly configured to allow require('https'). The builtin loader wraps host modules in a read-only proxy, but method calls such as Agent.prototype.on() are forwarded to the underlying host object, so sandbox code can register a listener for the agent's 'free' event. When an unrelated host HTTPS request releases a pooled connection, the listener receives the live host request options and the host TLSSocket, allowing sandboxed code to read the host's Authorization header and private destination host/port, attach a data listener to the released socket and read subsequent host response bodies in plaintext, and issue attacker-chosen authenticated requests using the stolen credentials. The issue is fixed in 3.11.7.

CVSS v3
10.0
EG Score
10.0CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
60
EG Risk 60/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity100% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
36th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
10.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 17, 2026

Last Modified

September 17, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Oct 30, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github.
Web page

vm2 3.11.3 through 3.11.6 HTTPS Credential Exposure via globalAgent | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/vm2-3.11.3-through-3.11.6-https-credential-exposure-via-globalagent
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

vm2 3.11.6 exposes host HTTPS credentials and TLS traffic through globalAgent · Advisory · patriksimek/vm2 · GitHub

https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/security/advisories/GHSA-h85j-hv3c-qfgq

Patch Availability(7)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:17931178132026-10-28redhat
redhatansible-automation-platform/bootc-automation-portal-rhel9:17918656602026-10-13redhat
redhatansible-automation-platform/automation-portal:17912953792026-10-12redhat
redhatansible-automation-platform/automation-portal:17912937802026-10-12redhat
redhatrhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:17913114952026-10-08redhat
redhatrhdh/red-hat-developer-hub-backstage-plugin-orchestrator-backend:17912512822026-10-06redhat
npmvm2 @ 3.11.7 (fixes >= 3.11.3, <= 3.11.6)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
vm2—
  • 3.11.3 up to 3.11.7: fixed in 3.11.7
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 26× in last 7d / 120× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 241 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 141 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 05:14 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 05:14 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 05:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85j-hv3c-qfgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  4. 2026-11-01 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  5. 2026-11-01 07:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85j-hv3c-qfgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  6. 2026-11-01 07:37 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-11-01 06:05 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-11-01 06:05 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  10. 2026-10-31 06:55 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-31 06:55 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  13. 2026-10-30 07:46 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-30 07:46 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  16. 2026-10-29 08:37 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-29 08:37 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  19. 2026-10-28 09:25 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-28 09:25 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-27 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  22. 2026-10-27 09:34 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-27 09:34 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-26 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  25. 2026-10-26 10:25 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-26 10:25 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  3. 2026-10-25 13:50 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-25 11:17 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-25 11:17 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  7. 2026-10-24 12:07 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-24 12:07 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-23 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  10. 2026-10-23 12:58 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-23 12:58 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  13. 2026-10-22 13:46 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-22 13:46 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 14:38 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-21 14:38 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-20 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  19. 2026-10-20 14:46 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-20 14:46 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  22. 2026-10-19 13:56 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-19 13:56 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  25. 2026-10-18 14:45 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-18 02:59 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  28. 2026-10-17 15:34 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-17 15:34 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-17 06:10 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-10-17 06:10 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-16 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  33. 2026-10-16 06:59 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-16 06:59 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  36. 2026-10-15 05:42 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-15 05:42 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  39. 2026-10-14 01:20 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-14 01:20 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  42. 2026-10-12 21:33 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-10-12 21:33 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  45. 2026-10-12 14:44 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-10-12 05:02 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-11 23:05 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-11 19:13 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-11 19:12 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-10-11 16:29 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-10-11 15:22 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-10-11 15:22 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-11 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  54. 2026-10-11 13:43 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-10-11 11:29 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-10-11 11:29 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-11 07:36 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-11 03:43 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-10 22:40 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-10-10 22:40 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  62. 2026-10-10 17:17 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-10 13:26 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-10 09:33 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-10 05:41 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-10 01:47 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-09 21:56 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-10-09 21:56 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-09 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  70. 2026-10-09 18:03 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-09 13:35 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-10-09 05:38 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-09 01:46 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-08 21:54 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-10-08 18:03 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-92940?
CVE-2026-92940 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 17, 2026. vm2 versions 3.11.3 through 3.11.6 expose the host process's real https.globalAgent to sandboxed code when a NodeVM is explicitly configured to allow require('https'). The builtin loader wraps host modules in a read-only proxy, but method calls such as Agent.prototype.on() are forwarded to the…
When was CVE-2026-92940 made public?
CVE-2026-92940 was made public on August 24, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on September 17, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-92940 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-92940 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (36th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-92940?
CVE-2026-92940 has a CVSS base score of 10.0 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-92940?
A fix for CVE-2026-92940 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-92940 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-92940

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-92940?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.