CVE-2026-89669

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-09-11. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — Patch released this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-76581 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it

nfsd4_copy_notify() finished initializing the cpntf state after nfs4_alloc_init_cpntf_state() had already linked it into the s2s_cp_stateids IDR and the parent's sc_cp_list, with cs_count == 1 (the membership reference) and none held for the caller. A racing OFFLOAD_CANCEL (crafted cl_id == nn->s2s_cp_cl_id plus the guessable so_id) could reach manage_cpntf_state() and free the entry, turning the caller's subsequent cpn_cnr_stateid read and cp_p_stateid/cp_p_clid writes into use-after-free. The owning clientid was also only recorded after publication, so it could not gate an ownership check in that window.

Record cp_p_stateid and cp_p_clid inside nfs4_alloc_init_cpntf_state() before nfs4_init_cp_state() publishes the entry, and return it with an extra reference. The caller reads the stateid under that reference and drops it with nfs4_put_cpntf_state(); on a late error the laundromat reaps the entry.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
44
EG Risk 44/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
52nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Oct 27, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e08a3dcaca0505f861e344a387f37f94d95dbdc2
Web page

nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d18d36395d973ef7372c8e6724970585f75b5c0b
Web page

nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a4d7fedcaaf33e60a01e53eafca9041ef966212f
Web page

nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9caad13b7cfe9ccb90cc405ac77335800e086595
Web page

nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/863b6e995665472f2af5be2436a874ab6a9e5ac6
Web page

nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4cdef96892f4fa6e70c405b6e8f2fd6972f3b64b
Web page

nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4415a692346a39fdb647cbd717eda510159aaf55
Web page

nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/129643893b79f8a3c6b72045f933fbab5ee424ca

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:4.22.9.8.202610241758-02026-10-27redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.64.1.el10_22026-10-08redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-687.56.1.el9_82026-10-08redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 28× in last 7d / 195× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 449 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 349 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 04:42 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 04:42 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 04:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-01 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  5. 2026-11-01 05:13 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-11-01 05:13 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-01 05:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-31 05:45 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-31 05:45 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-31 05:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-30 06:17 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-30 06:17 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-30 06:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-29 06:50 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-29 06:50 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-29 06:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-28 07:19 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-28 07:19 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-28 07:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-27 07:51 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-27 07:51 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-27 07:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  4. 2026-10-26 05:48 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-26 05:48 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-26 05:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-25 13:52 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-25 06:20 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-25 06:20 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-25 06:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-24 06:52 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-24 06:52 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-24 06:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-23 07:24 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-23 07:24 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-23 07:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-22 07:52 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-22 07:52 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-22 07:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-21 08:24 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-21 08:24 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-21 08:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  28. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  29. 2026-10-20 08:55 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-20 08:55 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-20 08:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  32. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  33. 2026-10-19 09:27 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-19 09:27 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-19 09:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  36. 2026-10-19 09:00 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-19 09:00 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-19 09:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  39. 2026-10-18 17:50 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-18 17:50 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-18 17:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  42. 2026-10-18 03:02 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-10-17 18:22 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-17 18:22 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-17 18:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  46. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  47. 2026-10-16 18:53 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-10-16 18:53 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-16 18:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  50. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  51. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  52. 2026-10-15 16:03 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-10-15 16:03 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-15 16:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  55. 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  56. 2026-10-14 10:13 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-10-14 10:13 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-14 10:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  59. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  60. 2026-10-13 08:36 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-10-13 08:36 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-13 08:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  63. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  64. 2026-10-12 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-10-12 09:05 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-10-12 09:05 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-12 09:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  68. 2026-10-11 21:05 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-11 21:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  70. 2026-10-11 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-10-11 16:31 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-10-11 16:01 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-10-11 16:01 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-11 16:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  75. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89669?
CVE-2026-89669 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 11, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it nfsd4_copy_notify() finished initializing the cpntf state after nfs4_alloc_init_cpntf_state() had already linked it into the s2s_cp_stateids IDR and the parent's sc_cp_list,…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-89669 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-89669 was published on September 11, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-89669 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89669 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (52nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89669?
CVE-2026-89669 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89669?
A fix for CVE-2026-89669 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89669 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89669

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89669?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.