CVE-2026-53360

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-04. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-41667 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-4pq2-jh73-g3hw (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: SEV: Require in-GHCB scratch area if GHCB v2+ is in use

As per the GHCB spec, when using GHCB v2+ require the software scratch area to reside in the GHCB's shared buffer. Note, things like Page State Change (PSC) requests _rely_ on this behavior, as the guest can't provide a length when making the request, i.e. the size of the guest payload is bounded by the size of the shared buffer.

Failure to force usage of the GHCB, and a slew of other flaws, lets a malicious SNP guest corrupt host kernel heap memory, and leak host heap layout information.

setup_vmgexit_scratch() allocates a buffer via kvzalloc(exit_info_2), where exit_info_2 is guest-controlled. With exit_info_2=24, this yields a 24-byte allocation in kmalloc-cg-32 (32-byte slab objects). The buffer holds an 8-byte psc_hdr followed by 8-byte psc_entry structs, so only entries[0] and entries[1] are in-bounds.

snp_begin_psc() validates end_entry against VMGEXIT_PSC_MAX_COUNT (253) but NOT against the actual buffer size:

idx_end = hdr->end_entry;

if (idx_end >= VMGEXIT_PSC_MAX_COUNT) { // checks 253, not buffer snp_complete_psc(svm, ...); return 1; }

for (idx = idx_start; idx <= idx_end; idx++) { entry_start = entries[idx]; // OOB when idx >= 2

The guest sets end_entry=10+, causing the host to iterate entries[2+] which are OOB into adjacent slab objects. For each OOB entry:

  • The host reads 8 bytes (OOB READ / info leak oracle)
  • If the data passes PSC validation, __snp_complete_one_psc() writes
cur_page = 1 or 512 into the entry (OOB WRITE, sev.c:3806)
  • If validation fails, the error response reveals whether adjacent
memory is zero vs non-zero (information disclosure to guest)

The guest controls allocation size (exit_info_2), entry range (cur_entry/end_entry), and can fire unlimited VMGEXITs to repeatedly hit different slab positions.

By exploiting the variety of bugs, a malicious SEV-SNP guest can:

  • OOB read adjacent kmalloc-cg-32 objects (heap layout disclosure)
  • OOB write cur_page bits into adjacent objects (heap corruption)
  • Trigger use-after-free conditions across VMGEXITs

E.g. with KASAN enabled, a single insmod of the PoC guest module produces 73 KASAN reports:

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in snp_begin_psc+0x126/0x890 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888219ffb5e0 by task qemu-system-x86/2199

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in snp_begin_psc+0x468/0x890 Write of size 8 at addr ffff888351566648 by task qemu-system-x86/2199

The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888XXXXXXXXX which belongs to the cache kmalloc-cg-32 of size 32 The buggy address is located N bytes to the right of allocated 32-byte region [ffff888XXXXXXXXX, ffff888XXXXXXXXX)

Breakdown: 62 slab-out-of-bounds (reads + writes past allocation) 7 slab-use-after-free 4 use-after-free

All credit to Stan for the wonderful description and reproducer!

[sean: write changelog]

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
56
EG Risk 56/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
22nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 4, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Jul 18, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

KVM: SEV: Require in-GHCB scratch area if GHCB v2+ is in use - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/db3f2195d29344a3cf1e9dd9ab7f21ced7308cf7
Web page

KVM: SEV: Require in-GHCB scratch area if GHCB v2+ is in use - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b328ede59ac34e7998e1eee5e5f0cc26c2a91846
Web page

KVM: SEV: Require in-GHCB scratch area if GHCB v2+ is in use - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c9b4198fbc6ed99a9da4bee9f74bb730f926c9ae
Web page

KVM: SEV: Require in-GHCB scratch area if GHCB v2+ is in use - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bf9ba093fbb83c0c9a3dedd50efec29424eca2fc

Patch Availability(14)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.94-1: fixed in 6.12.94-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (142 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.12-1: fixed in 7.0.12-1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(11)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 49× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 364 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 264 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  4. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  5. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  6. 2026-10-27 18:44 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-27 18:44 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-27 18:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4pq2-jh73-g3hw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  9. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 14:20 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  14. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  15. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  17. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  18. 2026-10-19 20:21 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-19 20:21 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-19 20:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4pq2-jh73-g3hw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  21. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  23. 2026-10-18 03:31 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  25. 2026-10-16 17:06 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-16 17:06 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-16 17:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4pq2-jh73-g3hw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  3. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  4. 2026-10-16 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-16 15:41 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-16 15:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4pq2-jh73-g3hw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  7. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  8. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  9. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  10. 2026-10-13 14:24 UTCOSV refresh
  11. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  12. 2026-10-12 15:57 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 19:40 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 14:19 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  17. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  18. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  19. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  20. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  21. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  22. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  23. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  24. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  25. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  26. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  27. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  28. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  29. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  30. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  31. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  32. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  33. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  34. 2026-09-23 06:31 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-23 06:31 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-09-23 06:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4pq2-jh73-g3hw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  37. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  38. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  39. 2026-09-18 06:10 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-18 06:10 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-09-18 06:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4pq2-jh73-g3hw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  42. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  43. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  44. 2026-09-13 23:59 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-13 23:59 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-13 23:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4pq2-jh73-g3hw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  47. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  48. 2026-09-13 08:51 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-13 08:51 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-09-13 08:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4pq2-jh73-g3hw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  51. 2026-09-12 13:46 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-12 13:46 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-09-12 13:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4pq2-jh73-g3hw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  54. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  55. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  56. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  57. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  58. 2026-09-06 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-06 14:15 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-09-06 14:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4pq2-jh73-g3hw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  61. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  62. 2026-09-05 23:36 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-05 23:36 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-05 23:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4pq2-jh73-g3hw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  65. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  66. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  67. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  68. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  69. 2026-08-31 00:23 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-31 00:23 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-31 00:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4pq2-jh73-g3hw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  72. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  73. 2026-08-30 11:14 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-30 11:14 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-30 11:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4pq2-jh73-g3hw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8

Publicly available exploits

(1 reference)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • GitHub PoC0xCyberstan/CVE-2026-53360-POC
    Published Jul 4, 2026

    PoC for CVE-2026-53360: guest-triggered heap out-of-bounds read/write in KVM SEV-SNP Page State Change (PSC) handling.

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53360?
CVE-2026-53360 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 4, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: SEV: Require in-GHCB scratch area if GHCB v2+ is in use As per the GHCB spec, when using GHCB v2+ require the software scratch area to reside in the GHCB's shared buffer. Note, things like Page State Change (PSC) requests rely…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-53360 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-53360 was published on July 4, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-53360 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53360 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (22nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53360?
CVE-2026-53360 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53360?
A fix for CVE-2026-53360 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-53360 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53360

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53360?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.