CVE-2026-84381

HIGHPre-NVD 8.18.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-08. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-70250 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-7mj9-2mp8-4m2p (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: <0.1%CVSS: 8.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

HTTPX2 is a next generation HTTP client for Python. Prior to 2.10.0, httpcore2 fails to start TLS in src/httpcore2/httpcore2/_sync/socks_proxy.py and src/httpcore2/httpcore2/_async/socks_proxy.py when the remote origin uses wss through a SOCKS5 proxy because the TLS upgrade condition only recognizes https. HTTPX2 exposes the flaw through Client.websocket() and AsyncClient.websocket() from 2.6.0 through 2.9.1, so the opening handshake, query parameters, Authorization headers, cookies, and subsequent frames can cross the proxy path in plaintext without certificate verification. An attacker controlling or observing that path can read or modify traffic and impersonate the WebSocket server. This issue is fixed in httpcore2 2.10.0 and HTTPX2 2.10.0.

CVSS v3
8.1
EG Score
8.1HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
36
EG Risk 36/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity81% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
<0.1%
EPSS %ILE
below the 1st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.1 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
<0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 2, 2026

Last Modified

September 9, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 2, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_pr, github_commit, github_release.
GitHub release Patch Available

v2.10.0

Patch available: pydantic/httpx2 v2.10.0

https://github.com/pydantic/httpx2/releases/tag/v2.10.0
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit fb008dd700b7 (pydantic/httpx2)

Patch available: pydantic/httpx2 v2.10.0 (contains commit fb008dd700b7)

https://github.com/pydantic/httpx2/commit/fb008dd700b761d955210d9692475c3e2f379453
GitHub pull request Patch Available

Start TLS for wss scheme in SOCKS5 proxy connections

Patch available: pydantic/httpx2 v2.10.0 (PR #1104 merged 2026-08-02)

https://github.com/pydantic/httpx2/pull/1104
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Secure WebSocket traffic sent without TLS through SOCKS proxies · Advisory · pydantic/httpx2 · GitHub

https://github.com/pydantic/httpx2/security/advisories/GHSA-7mj9-2mp8-4m2p

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhoai/odh-kserve-autogluon-server-rhel9:17919503882026-10-21redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-spyre-rhel9:17918183572026-10-13redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-gaudi-rhel9:17914271822026-10-13redhat
piphttpcore2 @ 2.10.0 (fixes < 2.10.0)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
httpcore20.0.0 ... 2.9.1 (13 versions)
  • every version up to 2.10.0: fixed in 2.10.0
—
httpx22.6.0, 2.7.0, 2.8.0, 2.9.0, 2.9.1
  • 2.6.0 up to 2.10.0: fixed in 2.10.0
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 87 are merged into the row they repeat.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mj9-2mp8-4m2p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  3. 2026-11-01 07:38 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  5. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  6. 2026-10-27 20:14 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-27 20:14 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 13:56 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  11. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  12. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  13. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  14. 2026-10-20 07:49 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-20 07:49 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  17. 2026-10-18 03:06 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  19. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  20. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  21. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  22. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  23. 2026-10-13 05:36 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  25. 2026-10-12 14:53 UTCEG score recompute
Show 60 more
  1. 2026-10-11 19:18 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 16:35 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 13:52 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  5. 2026-10-09 23:45 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  7. 2026-10-09 01:38 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  9. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  10. 2026-10-07 02:15 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  12. 2026-10-06 01:56 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  14. 2026-10-05 01:30 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  16. 2026-10-04 01:10 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  18. 2026-10-02 20:55 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  20. 2026-10-02 07:51 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  22. 2026-09-30 19:18 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  24. 2026-09-30 03:03 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-29 09:22 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-27 17:46 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  28. 2026-09-26 17:25 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  30. 2026-09-26 04:51 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-24 15:20 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  33. 2026-09-24 02:37 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  35. 2026-09-22 01:56 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  37. 2026-09-20 01:16 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-18 00:38 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  40. 2026-09-17 00:14 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  42. 2026-09-15 11:43 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  44. 2026-09-12 22:18 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-11 21:57 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  47. 2026-09-11 09:47 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-10 21:37 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-08 23:11 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  51. 2026-09-08 03:01 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-06 01:38 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  54. 2026-09-05 13:29 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-05 01:18 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-04 08:04 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  58. 2026-09-02 19:31 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-02 18:28 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 8.1 HIGH
  60. 2026-09-02 18:26 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-84381?
CVE-2026-84381 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 2, 2026. HTTPX2 is a next generation HTTP client for Python. Prior to 2.10.0, httpcore2 fails to start TLS in src/httpcore2/httpcore2/_sync/socks_proxy.py and src/httpcore2/httpcore2/_async/socks_proxy.py when the remote origin uses wss through a SOCKS5 proxy because the TLS upgrade condition only…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-84381 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-84381 was published on September 2, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 9, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-84381 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-84381 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a <0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (below the 1st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-84381?
CVE-2026-84381 has a CVSS base score of 8.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-84381?
A fix for CVE-2026-84381 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-84381 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-84381

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-84381?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.