PostGIS before 3.7.0beta2 contains an out-of-bounds read vulnerability that allows attackers to cause memory disclosure or a server crash by supplying a malformed FlatGeobuf buffer. The FlatGeobuf property metadata decoder verifies that a string length field is present but fails to verify that the subsequent string body is contained within the supplied buffer before materializing it into a SQL-visible value, enabling memory disclosure or denial of service.
CVE-2026-73515
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 8.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-13. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.1; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2026-58108 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.1
- EG Score
- 8.1HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 52EG Risk 52/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity81% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 46th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 8.1 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-28). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 13, 2026
Last Modified
September 24, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Aug 13, 2026PostGIS < 3.7.0beta2 Out-of-Bounds Read via FlatGeobuf Buffer | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/postgis-0beta2-out-of-bounds-read-via-flatgeobuf-bufferPart 1/6 | Systemic Risks in the Managed PostgreSQL Industry: Extension Risks Are Real! Exploiting PostGis Memory Corruption Bug at NeonDB, SupaBase and Many More - Mehmet Ince @mdisec - Vulnerability Researcher | Building security products | Security Advisor | Amateur Muay Thai fighter
https://mehmetince.net/part-1-6-systemic-risks-in-the-managed-postgresql-industry-extension-risks-are-real-exploiting-postgis-memory-corruption-bug-at-neondb-supabase-and-many-more/Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-73515(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:67848Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: postgresql:18 security update
- RHSA-2026:67491Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: postgresql:16 security update
- GHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6GitHub Security AdvisoriesHigh
PostGIS before 3.7.0beta2 contains an out-of-bounds read vulnerability that allows attackers to...
Patch Availability(4)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | postgresql:18-9080020260914093252.rhel9 | 2026-09-16 | redhat |
| redhat | postgresql:16-9080020260907191505.rhel9 | 2026-09-15 | redhat |
| redhat | postgresql18-postgis-0:3.5.3-1.el10_2.1 | 2026-09-14 | redhat |
| redhat | postgresql16-postgis-0:3.5.3-4.el10_2.1 | 2026-09-09 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| postgis | 3.3.2+dfsg-1 ... 3.7.0~rc2+dfsg-1~exp1 (67 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| postgis | 3.5.2+dfsg-1 ... 3.7.0~rc2+dfsg-1~exp1 (23 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| postgis | 3.5.2+dfsg-1 ... 3.7.0~rc2+dfsg-1~exp1 (23 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(2)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 62× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 282 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 182 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-28 22:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 22:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 22:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-10-28 20:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-21 00:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 00:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 00:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-13 07:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 07:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 07:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-07 01:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 01:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 01:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-06 13:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 13:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 13:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-05 14:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 14:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 14:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-04 22:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 22:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-10-04 08:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 08:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-10-03 19:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 19:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 19:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-02 19:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 19:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 19:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-10-02 07:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 07:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 07:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-01 09:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 09:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-09-30 21:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 21:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 21:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-29 03:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 03:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 03:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-28 12:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 12:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-09-28 00:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 00:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 00:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-27 09:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 09:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 09:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-25 08:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 08:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-09-24 20:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 20:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 20:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-09-24 09:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 09:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-09-23 21:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 21:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 21:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv7r-wgc7-6mc6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:67491
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-73515?
When was CVE-2026-73515 made public?
Is CVE-2026-73515 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-73515?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-73515?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-73515
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-73515?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.