CVE-2026-72029

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-15. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-58987 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: wwan: iosm: bound device offsets in the MUX downlink decoder

mux_dl_adb_decode() walks a chain of aggregated datagram tables using offsets and lengths taken from the modem. first_table_index, next_table_index, table_length, datagram_index and datagram_length are all device supplied le values. Only first_table_index was checked, and only for being non zero. The decoder then formed adth = block + adth_index and read the table header and the datagram entries with no bound against the received skb. A modem that reports an index or a length past the downlink buffer makes the decoder read out of bounds.

The buffer is IPC_MEM_MAX_DL_MUX_LITE_BUF_SIZE and skb->len is at most that, so skb->len is the real limit, but none of these in band offsets were checked against it.

The table chain is also followed with no forward progress check. The loop takes the next table from adth->next_table_index and stops only when that reaches zero. A modem can stage two tables that point at each other, so the loop never ends. It runs in softirq and clones the skb on every pass.

Validate every device offset and length against skb->len before use. The block header must fit. Each table header, on entry and after every next_table_index, must lie inside the skb. The datagram table must fit. Each datagram index and length must stay inside the skb. The header padding must not exceed the datagram length so the receive length does not wrap. Require each next_table_index to move forward so the chain cannot cycle.

This was reproduced under KASAN as a slab out of bounds read on a normal downlink receive once the iosm net device is up.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
34th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

net: wwan: iosm: bound device offsets in the MUX downlink decoder - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/77f0023f22f6a2616ae128e9c93961b24ae52611
Web page

net: wwan: iosm: bound device offsets in the MUX downlink decoder - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55cfea8e8d9117ad086d1e1a0ff87f306f8e3ad0
Web page

net: wwan: iosm: bound device offsets in the MUX downlink decoder - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/526b8ef54668780c8f69e0211c342763d5dcbad1
Web page

net: wwan: iosm: bound device offsets in the MUX downlink decoder - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b822df8e498aa6ca828e16afd8ffec27f7e4c88
Web page

net: wwan: iosm: bound device offsets in the MUX downlink decoder - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/155851e501d6c649cbcfcca6472dc26269b04b6b
Web page

net: wwan: iosm: bound device offsets in the MUX downlink decoder - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/07f5eb6d268a37bd9e131079489655cd599182e0

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-72029(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(9)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (55 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.180-1: fixed in 6.1.180-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (31 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.100-1: fixed in 6.12.100-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (160 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.5-1: fixed in 7.1.5-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(9)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 64× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 232 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 132 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  4. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  5. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  6. 2026-10-27 18:46 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-27 18:46 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-27 18:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  9. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  10. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 14:07 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  14. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-19 22:32 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-19 22:32 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-19 22:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  21. 2026-10-19 21:34 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-19 21:34 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-19 21:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  24. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-18 03:16 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  3. 2026-10-16 17:31 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-16 17:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  5. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  6. 2026-10-16 16:05 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-16 16:05 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-16 16:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  9. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-13 08:22 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-13 08:22 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-13 08:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  15. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-12 15:42 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-11 19:28 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-11 16:43 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-11 14:03 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-06 22:51 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-06 22:51 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-06 22:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  28. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  29. 2026-10-06 09:19 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-06 09:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  31. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  32. 2026-10-05 12:53 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-05 12:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  34. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  35. 2026-10-04 22:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  36. 2026-10-04 08:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  37. 2026-10-03 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-10-03 19:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  39. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  40. 2026-10-02 19:51 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-10-02 19:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  42. 2026-10-02 07:16 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-10-02 07:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  44. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  45. 2026-10-01 09:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  46. 2026-09-30 21:24 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-09-30 21:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  48. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  49. 2026-09-29 02:43 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-29 02:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  51. 2026-09-28 12:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  52. 2026-09-27 23:22 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-27 23:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  54. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  55. 2026-09-27 08:55 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-27 08:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  57. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  58. 2026-09-25 02:54 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-25 02:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  60. 2026-09-24 13:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  61. 2026-09-24 01:03 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-09-24 01:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  63. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  64. 2026-09-23 12:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  65. 2026-09-22 23:48 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-22 23:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  67. 2026-09-22 10:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  68. 2026-09-21 21:56 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-21 21:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  70. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  71. 2026-09-21 09:19 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-09-21 09:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  73. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  74. 2026-09-20 18:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  75. 2026-09-20 04:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c6r7-hv37-qqm7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-72029?
CVE-2026-72029 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: wwan: iosm: bound device offsets in the MUX downlink decoder mux_dl_adb_decode() walks a chain of aggregated datagram tables using offsets and lengths taken from the modem. first_table_index, next_table_index, table_length,…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-72029 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-72029 was published on August 15, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-72029 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-72029 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (34th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-72029?
CVE-2026-72029 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-72029?
A fix for CVE-2026-72029 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-72029 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-72029

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-72029?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.