CVE-2026-73511

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.35.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (31st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-84121 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 5.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy designed for cloud-native applications. Prior to 1.36.10, 1.37.6, 1.38.4, and 1.39.1, Envoy normally matches the raw request path, while servlet backends such as Apache Tomcat strip semicolon matrix parameters from each path segment before resolving the resource. Envoy's ignore_path_parameters_in_path_matching option instead truncates at the first semicolon and still does not match per-segment backend behavior. A remote client can use a parameterized protected segment, or a parameter on an earlier segment, to make Envoy select an unprotected fallback while the backend resolves the protected resource. The relevant scope boundary is that the bypass requires both a path-based Envoy decision and a backend that strips semicolon parameters per segment. This issue is fixed in versions 1.36.10, 1.37.6, 1.38.4, and 1.39.1.

CVSS v3
5.3
EG Score
5.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
39
EG Risk 39/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity53% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
31st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 21, 2026

Last Modified

October 5, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Sep 21, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit, github_release.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Potential path-matching/authentication bypass when using Envoy in combination with a backend stripping per-segment path (matrix) parameters (e.g. Apache Tomcat) · Advisory · envoyproxy/envoy · GitHub

https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/security/advisories/GHSA-m745-gh6x-349x
GitHub release Patch Available

v1.39.1

Patch available: envoyproxy/envoy v1.39.1

https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/releases/tag/v1.39.1
GitHub release Patch Available

v1.38.4

Patch available: envoyproxy/envoy v1.38.4

https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/releases/tag/v1.38.4
GitHub release Patch Available

v1.37.6

Patch available: envoyproxy/envoy v1.37.6

https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/releases/tag/v1.37.6
GitHub release Patch Available

v1.36.10

Patch available: envoyproxy/envoy v1.36.10

https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/releases/tag/v1.36.10
GitHub commit

commit fcb663752c70 (envoyproxy/envoy)

Fix landed in envoyproxy/envoy commit fcb663752c70 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/commit/fcb663752c7055257f5dcc8b6ce6c7c905ebb1ff
GitHub commit

commit b205d1f4982e (envoyproxy/envoy)

Fix landed in envoyproxy/envoy commit b205d1f4982e — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/commit/b205d1f4982e14ce5693ba94ef84d37e7155e050
GitHub commit

commit 50f7bfa48dcc (envoyproxy/envoy)

Fix landed in envoyproxy/envoy commit 50f7bfa48dcc — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/commit/50f7bfa48dccfee339822e9846b2b8053e07d325

Patch Availability(5)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 54× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 06:55 UTCOSV refresh
  5. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  6. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  7. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  8. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 14:05 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  12. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  13. 2026-10-22 19:02 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-22 19:02 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  17. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  18. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 03:15 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  22. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  23. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  24. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  25. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
Show 64 more
  1. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 15:40 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-12 01:41 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-11 19:26 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:42 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 14:01 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 22:56 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-10 22:56 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  11. 2026-10-09 21:34 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-09 21:34 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  14. 2026-10-08 20:12 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-08 20:12 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  17. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  18. 2026-10-07 17:53 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-06 16:06 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-06 16:06 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  22. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  23. 2026-10-05 14:43 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-05 09:44 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-05 09:44 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  27. 2026-10-04 08:23 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-10-04 08:23 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  30. 2026-10-03 07:01 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-10-03 07:01 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-02 05:39 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-02 05:39 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  35. 2026-10-01 04:09 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-10-01 04:09 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-30 02:44 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-30 02:44 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  40. 2026-09-29 01:22 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-29 01:22 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  43. 2026-09-28 00:00 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-28 00:00 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  46. 2026-09-26 22:38 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-09-26 22:38 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  49. 2026-09-25 21:11 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-09-24 19:48 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-24 19:48 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-23 18:26 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-23 18:26 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  55. 2026-09-23 17:43 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-09-22 16:22 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-22 16:22 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-22 15:45 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-22 15:45 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-09-21 21:22 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-21 21:22 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-09-21 20:25 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 5.3 MEDIUM
  63. 2026-09-21 20:25 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-21 20:23 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-73511?
CVE-2026-73511 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 21, 2026. Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy designed for cloud-native applications. Prior to 1.36.10, 1.37.6, 1.38.4, and 1.39.1, Envoy normally matches the raw request path, while servlet backends such as Apache Tomcat strip semicolon matrix parameters from each path segment before resolving…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-73511 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-73511 was published on September 21, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-73511 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-73511 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (31st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-73511?
CVE-2026-73511 has a CVSS base score of 5.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-73511?
A fix for CVE-2026-73511 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-73511 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-73511

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-73511?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.