CVE-2026-68159

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-08-10. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-55545 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

libceph: bound pg_{temp,upmap,upmap_items} length to CEPH_PG_MAX_SIZE

__decode_pg_temp() decodes an user-controlled length but only rejects values large enough to overflow the allocation; it does not bound it to CEPH_PG_MAX_SIZE. The helper backs both pg_temp and pg_upmap decoding, and apply_upmap()/get_temp_osds() later copy the decoded list into the fixed-size on-stack array struct ceph_osds.osds[CEPH_PG_MAX_SIZE]. A monitor that sends an OSDMap with a pg_temp/pg_upmap entry longer than 32 thus causes a stack out-of-bounds write.

An OSD set for a single PG can never exceed CEPH_PG_MAX_SIZE, so reject longer entries at decode time. The bound is well below the old overflow threshold, so it also covers the allocation-size overflow the previous check guarded against.

BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in ceph_pg_to_up_acting_osds Write of size 4 ... by task exploit kasan_report (mm/kasan/report.c:595) ceph_pg_to_up_acting_osds (net/ceph/osdmap.c:2617 net/ceph/osdmap.c:2833) calc_target (net/ceph/osd_client.c:1638) __submit_request (net/ceph/osd_client.c:2394) ceph_osdc_start_request (net/ceph/osd_client.c:2490) ceph_osdc_call (net/ceph/osd_client.c:5164) rbd_dev_image_probe (drivers/block/rbd.c:6899) do_rbd_add (drivers/block/rbd.c:7138) ... kernel BUG at net/ceph/osdmap.c:2670!

[ idryomov: do the same in __decode_pg_upmap_items() ]

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
59
EG Risk 59/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.8% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
54th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 10, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Oct 27, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

libceph: bound pg_{temp,upmap,upmap_items} length to CEPH_PG_MAX_SIZE - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ebdf4b4f3b1474079980a2e5cd79ad65fb54db57
Web page

libceph: bound pg_{temp,upmap,upmap_items} length to CEPH_PG_MAX_SIZE - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e36663145abd7024f0281dfb22fdef65f185845b
Web page

libceph: bound pg_{temp,upmap,upmap_items} length to CEPH_PG_MAX_SIZE - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d5650ddbd4d42c1a916c8fe1a4c4cb573ef810a1
Web page

libceph: bound pg_{temp,upmap,upmap_items} length to CEPH_PG_MAX_SIZE - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9f00f9cf2be293efe899db67dc5272e3a9c62717
Web page

libceph: bound pg_{temp,upmap,upmap_items} length to CEPH_PG_MAX_SIZE - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/66eec4af1e080b695229c9a20635648a6d12fedf
Web page

libceph: bound pg_{temp,upmap,upmap_items} length to CEPH_PG_MAX_SIZE - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/590b07ceea138d49c9b64f65d263aa902d3b4730
Web page

libceph: bound pg_{temp,upmap,upmap_items} length to CEPH_PG_MAX_SIZE - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4daf06456677177f2a6044729abac59c1b49e87b
Web page

libceph: bound pg_{temp,upmap,upmap_items} length to CEPH_PG_MAX_SIZE - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/42bc06c67d94d5f2a6b33294b0c4b07d8a47c515

Patch Availability(11)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (56 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.187-1: fixed in 6.1.187-1
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.107-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (33 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.105-1: fixed in 6.12.105-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (161 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.6-1: fixed in 7.1.6-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(7)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 28× in last 7d / 132× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 506 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 406 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  2. 2026-11-02 10:28 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-11-02 10:28 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-02 10:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  5. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  6. 2026-11-01 11:19 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-11-01 11:19 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-01 11:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  10. 2026-10-31 12:09 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-31 12:09 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-31 12:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  14. 2026-10-30 13:00 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-30 13:00 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-30 12:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  18. 2026-10-29 13:50 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-29 13:50 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-29 13:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  22. 2026-10-28 14:39 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-28 14:39 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-28 14:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-27 15:01 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-27 15:01 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-27 15:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  5. 2026-10-26 15:47 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-26 15:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-10-25 16:36 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-25 16:36 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-25 16:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 14:10 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-24 17:24 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 17:24 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-24 17:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  16. 2026-10-23 18:15 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-23 18:15 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-23 18:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  20. 2026-10-22 19:01 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-22 19:01 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-22 19:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  24. 2026-10-21 19:50 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-21 19:50 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-21 19:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  28. 2026-10-20 20:41 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-20 20:41 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-20 20:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  31. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  32. 2026-10-19 21:31 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-19 21:31 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-19 21:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  35. 2026-10-19 21:03 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-10-19 21:03 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-19 21:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  38. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  39. 2026-10-19 14:21 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-19 14:21 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-19 14:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  42. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  43. 2026-10-18 15:10 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-18 15:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  45. 2026-10-18 03:20 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  47. 2026-10-17 15:58 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-17 15:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  49. 2026-10-16 16:48 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-10-16 16:48 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-16 16:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  52. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  53. 2026-10-16 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-10-16 16:04 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-16 16:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  56. 2026-10-16 13:19 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-10-16 13:19 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-16 13:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  59. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  60. 2026-10-15 14:08 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-10-15 14:08 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-15 14:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  63. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  64. 2026-10-14 08:54 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-10-14 08:54 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-14 08:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  67. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  68. 2026-10-13 05:09 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-10-13 05:09 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-13 05:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  71. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  72. 2026-10-12 15:45 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-10-12 05:59 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-12 05:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83x9-86wr-8vh2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  75. 2026-10-11 19:30 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-68159?
CVE-2026-68159 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 10, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: libceph: bound pg_{temp,upmap,upmap_items} length to CEPH_PG_MAX_SIZE __decode_pg_temp() decodes an user-controlled length but only rejects values large enough to overflow the allocation; it does not bound it to CEPH_PG_MAX_SIZE.…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-68159 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-68159 was published on August 10, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-68159 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-68159 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (54th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-68159?
CVE-2026-68159 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-68159?
A fix for CVE-2026-68159 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-68159 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-68159

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-68159?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.