libp2p-rust is the official Rust language implementation of the libp2p networking stack. Prior to 0.13.1, libp2p-quic could panic during an inbound QUIC handshake when a remote peer presented a valid short-lived libp2p TLS certificate and delayed the final TLS 1.3 handshake fragment until after the certificate expired. In the Quinn post-handshake upgrade path, transports/quic/src/connection/connecting.rs called libp2p_tls::certificate::parse a second time in remote_peer_id and used expect on the result. The repeated wall-clock validity check could reject the now-expired certificate, causing the expect call to terminate any application exposing an affected libp2p-quic listener. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.13.1.
CVE-2026-61544
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 8.2 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (20th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-79501 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-5hq8-qhww-jm7q (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.2
- EG Score
- 8.2HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 68EG Risk 68/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity82% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.2 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 20th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.2): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.2 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 8.2 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 15, 2026
Last Modified
September 30, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Sep 15, 2026commit e8f35e12c241 (libp2p/rust-libp2p)
Patch available: libp2p/rust-libp2p v0.57.0 (contains commit e8f35e12c241)
https://github.com/libp2p/rust-libp2p/commit/e8f35e12c2418b04df6e9cdf036005e8aee3c7a2commit 212f3774af04 (libp2p/rust-libp2p)
Fix landed in libp2p/rust-libp2p commit 212f3774af04 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/libp2p/rust-libp2p/commit/212f3774af048e2cecfb2e6b1e08477685e52b22fix(quic): avoid panic on post-handshake cert validation
Patch available: libp2p/rust-libp2p v0.57.0 (PR #6525 merged 2026-07-17)
https://github.com/libp2p/rust-libp2p/pull/6525Remote panic in libp2p-quic via certificate expiry race during QUIC handshake · Advisory · libp2p/rust-libp2p · GitHub
https://github.com/libp2p/rust-libp2p/security/advisories/GHSA-5hq8-qhww-jm7qVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-61544(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| rust | libp2p-quic @ 0.13.1 (fixes < 0.13.1) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
crates.io(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| libp2p-quic | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-11-01 07:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5hq8-qhww-jm7q · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-11-01 07:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-10-28 06:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-20 18:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
Show 55 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-13 13:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-11 05:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-10 03:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-08 22:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-08 10:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-06 23:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-06 00:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-05 01:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-03 15:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-03 03:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-02 04:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-09-30 18:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-09-29 20:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 05:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 18:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-09-27 18:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 19:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-09-26 08:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 22:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 23:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-09-23 00:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 01:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 02:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 04:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-09-18 05:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 18:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 20:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-09-15 20:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 19:58 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 8.2 HIGH
- 2026-09-15 19:57 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-61544?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-61544 published?
Is CVE-2026-61544 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-61544?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-61544?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-61544
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-61544?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.