A malicious GOPROXY was previously capable of forging up to two sumdb tiles that allow for a requested module to bypass the GOSUMDB check and persist attacker-controlled module content to a local Go module cache. This attack allows for a malicious GOPROXY to serve malicious module content that cannot be detected by evaluating the transparency log. All tiles are now correctly verified against their parents. In order to determine if you have been affected: rm -r go.sum go.work.sum vendor/ && go mod tidy
CVE-2026-56865
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 8.4 under CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.1% (2nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-58513 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.4
- EG Score
- 8.4HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 38EG Risk 38/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity84% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.4 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.1% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 2nd
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.4): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.4 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 8.4 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 · CVSS v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 13, 2026
Last Modified
September 3, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Aug 14, 2026x/mod/sumdb/tlog: fix transparency log tile verification bypass · Issue #80744 · golang/go · GitHub
https://go.dev/issue/80744Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-56865(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:74609Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.3
- RHSA-2026:67714Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHACS 4.11.4 security and bug fix update
- CVE-2026-56865Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)High
Fix transparency log tile verification bypass in golang.org/x/mod/sumdb/tlog
Patch Availability(3)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | golang-1.22-src (1.22.2-2ubuntu0.5) @ noble | 2026-11-01 | ubuntu |
| redhat | cluster-observability-operator/cluster-observability-rhel9-operator:1790854599 | 2026-10-01 | redhat |
| redhat | advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-rhel9-operator:1789411320 | 2026-09-15 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(7 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:14(3)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-1.25 | 1.25.0-1 ... 1.25.9-1 (20 versions) |
| — |
| golang-1.26 | 1.26.0-1 ... 1.26~rc3-2 (16 versions) |
| — |
| golang-1.27 | 1.27~rc1-1, 1.27~rc2-1 |
| — |
Go(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang.org/x/mod | — |
| — |
| toolchain | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-1.19 | 1.19.10-1 ... 1.19.9-1 (12 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-1.24 | 1.24.12-1 ... 1.24.9-1 (10 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(1)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 167 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 67 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-11-01 05:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 05:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-24 16:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-17 02:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 02:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-06 22:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 22:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-06 09:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 09:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-05 14:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 14:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-04 22:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 08:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 19:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 19:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-02 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 19:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-02 07:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 07:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-01 09:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 21:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 21:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-09-29 03:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 03:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-09-28 12:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 00:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 00:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-09-27 09:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 09:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-09-25 03:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 03:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-09-24 09:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 21:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 21:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-23 09:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 20:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 20:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 04:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 04:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-21 16:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-21 03:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 15:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 01:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 01:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 13:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 01:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 01:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-18 12:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 00:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 00:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-17 12:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 23:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 23:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownGo:golang.org/x/mod · Debian:14:golang-1.27
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:67714 · ubuntu:USN-8935-1 · redhat:RHSA-2026:74609
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-56865?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-56865 published?
Is CVE-2026-56865 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-56865?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-56865?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-56865
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-56865?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.