CVE-2026-55194

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (49th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-62667 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to 3.27.0, rpc_client_recv_fragment in libfreerdp/core/gateway/rpc_client.c ensures the response reassembly stream capacity using only the server-declared alloc_hint rather than the actual StubLength about to be written. A malicious TS Gateway can send a PTYPE_RESPONSE with a small alloc_hint and a much larger frag_length, causing Stream_Write to copy attacker-controlled stub data beyond the 4096-byte pdu->s buffer. This can crash the client and may permit code execution through heap corruption. This issue is fixed in version 3.27.0.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
60
EG Risk 60/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
49th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 19, 2026

Last Modified

October 26, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Oct 26, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github_release, github, github_commit, github_pr.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)🟡 PoC Available

Heap-buffer-overflow write in TS Gateway RPC RESPONSE reassembly due to alloc_hint capacity mismatch · Advisory · FreeRDP/FreeRDP · GitHub

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-9gxm-3mf5-f5cx
GitHub release Patch Available

3.27.0

Patch available: FreeRDP/FreeRDP 3.27.0

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/releases/tag/3.27.0
GitHub pull request

Bounds fixes

Fix merged in FreeRDP/FreeRDP PR #12873 on 2026-06-11 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/pull/12873
GitHub commit

commit 9f2da52c2341 (FreeRDP/FreeRDP)

Fix landed in FreeRDP/FreeRDP commit 9f2da52c2341 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/commit/9f2da52c2341cc14a96ad12e69c5b83d0bcd8b5a

Patch Availability(12)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuwinpr3-utils (3.30.0+dfsg-0ubuntu0.26.04.1) @ resolute2026-11-01ubuntu
redhatfreerdp-2:2.11.2-1.el9_4.112026-09-24redhat
redhatfreerdp-2:2.4.1-6.el9_2.122026-09-24redhat
redhatfreerdp-2:2.11.7-1.el9_6.132026-09-24redhat
redhatfreerdp-2:3.10.3-3.el10_0.162026-09-17redhat
redhatfreerdp-0:2.1.1-5.el7_9.122026-09-17redhat
redhatfreerdp-2:2.2.0-12.el8_8.112026-09-10redhat
redhatfreerdp-2:2.2.0-7.el8_6.122026-09-10redhat
redhatfreerdp-2:2.2.0-14.el8_4.32026-09-09redhat
redhatfreerdp-2:2.11.7-12.el8_102026-09-02redhat
redhatfreerdp-2:2.11.7-7.el9_8.62026-08-31redhat
redhatfreerdp-2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.102026-08-31redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freerdp22.10.0+dfsg1-1 ... 2.11.7+dfsg1-6~deb12u1 (13 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freerdp33.15.0+dfsg-2.1 ... 3.32.0+dfsg-1 (47 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freerdp33.15.0+dfsg-2.1 ... 3.26.0+dfsg-1~bpo13+1 (33 versions)
  • every version up to 3.27.0+dfsg-1: fixed in 3.27.0+dfsg-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(3)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 100× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 279 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 179 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 21:33 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-01 21:33 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  4. 2026-10-31 19:54 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-31 19:54 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  7. 2026-10-30 18:14 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-30 18:14 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  10. 2026-10-29 16:36 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-29 16:36 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  13. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  14. 2026-10-28 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-28 14:57 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  17. 2026-10-27 12:59 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-27 12:59 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  20. 2026-10-26 11:27 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-25 22:58 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-25 22:58 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  24. 2026-10-25 14:19 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-24 21:18 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-24 21:18 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  3. 2026-10-23 19:40 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-23 19:40 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  6. 2026-10-22 17:59 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-22 17:59 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  9. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  10. 2026-10-21 16:21 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-21 16:21 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  13. 2026-10-20 14:41 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-20 14:41 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  16. 2026-10-19 12:59 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-19 12:59 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 11:20 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-18 03:30 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  22. 2026-10-17 09:39 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-17 09:39 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  25. 2026-10-16 07:58 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-16 07:58 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  28. 2026-10-15 06:17 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-15 06:17 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  31. 2026-10-14 01:56 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-10-14 01:56 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  34. 2026-10-12 22:13 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-10-12 22:13 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  37. 2026-10-12 15:56 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-10-12 06:54 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-11 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-11 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-10-11 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  43. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  44. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  45. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  46. 2026-10-08 07:41 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-10-08 07:41 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  49. 2026-10-07 10:26 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-07 05:20 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-07 01:17 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-06 21:21 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-06 16:58 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-10-06 16:58 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  56. 2026-10-06 12:26 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-06 07:57 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  61. 2026-10-05 13:53 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-05 09:32 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-05 05:36 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-05 01:45 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-10-05 01:45 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  67. 2026-10-04 21:24 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-04 14:41 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-04 10:22 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-04 06:31 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-04 02:41 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-10-03 20:48 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-03 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-10-03 16:55 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-55194?
CVE-2026-55194 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 19, 2026. FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to 3.27.0, rpc_client_recv_fragment in libfreerdp/core/gateway/rpc_client.c ensures the response reassembly stream capacity using only the server-declared alloc_hint rather than the actual StubLength about to be written. A…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-55194 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-55194 was published on August 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 26, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-55194 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-55194 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (49th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-55194?
CVE-2026-55194 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-55194?
A fix for CVE-2026-55194 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-55194 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-55194

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-55194?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.