FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to 3.24.0, the gdi_surface_bits() function processes SURFACE_BITS_COMMAND messages sent by the RDP server. When the command is handled using NSCodec, the bmp.width and bmp.height values provided by the server are not properly validated against the actual desktop dimensions. A malicious RDP server can supply crafted bmp.width and bmp.height values that exceed the expected surface size. Because these values are used during bitmap decoding and memory operations without proper bounds checking, this can lead to a heap buffer overflow. Since the attacker can also control the associated pixel data transmitted by the server, the overflow may be exploitable to overwrite adjacent heap memory. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.24.0.
CVE-2026-31806
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.7% (52nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-12060 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 59EG Risk 59/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.7% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.7%
- EPSS %ILE
- 52nd
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
March 13, 2026
Last Modified
July 15, 2026
Advisory Details (10)
Auto-updated Oct 31, 2026Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.6 Extended Update Support.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6727Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6340Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19033Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:11323Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10951Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10735Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10734Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Update Services for SAP Solutions and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Telecommunications Update Serv
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10076Heap Buffer Overflow in nsc_process_message() via Unchecked SURFACE_BITS_COMMAND Bitmap Dimensions · Advisory · FreeRDP/FreeRDP · GitHub
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-rrqm-46rj-cmx2commit 83d9aedea278 (FreeRDP/FreeRDP)
Fix landed in FreeRDP/FreeRDP commit 83d9aedea278 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/commit/83d9aedea278a74af3e490ff5eeb889c016dbb2bVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-31806(14)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:19033Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: freerdp security update
- RHSA-2026:11323Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: freerdp security update
- RHSA-2026:10951Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: freerdp security update
- RHSA-2026:10735Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: freerdp security update
- RHSA-2026:10734Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: freerdp security update
- RHSA-2026:10076Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: freerdp security update
- RHSA-2026:9641Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: freerdp security update
- RHSA-2026:9640Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: freerdp security update
- +6 more
Patch Availability(15)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | winpr3-utils (3.30.0+dfsg-0ubuntu0.26.04.1) @ resolute | 2026-11-01 | ubuntu |
| redhat | freerdp-2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.2 | 2026-05-19 | redhat |
| redhat | freerdp-0:2.1.1-5.el7_9.7 | 2026-04-28 | redhat |
| redhat | freerdp-2:2.2.0-7.el8_6.5 | 2026-04-27 | redhat |
| redhat | freerdp-2:2.2.0-12.el8_4 | 2026-04-27 | redhat |
| redhat | freerdp-2:2.0.0-46.rc4.el8_2.10 | 2026-04-27 | redhat |
| redhat | freerdp-2:2.2.0-12.el8_8.5 | 2026-04-23 | redhat |
| redhat | freerdp-2:2.4.1-6.el9_2.6 | 2026-04-22 | redhat |
| redhat | freerdp-2:2.4.1-3.el9_0.4 | 2026-04-22 | redhat |
| redhat | freerdp-2:2.11.2-1.el9_4.5 | 2026-04-08 | redhat |
| redhat | freerdp-2:3.10.3-3.el10_0.5 | 2026-04-07 | redhat |
| redhat | freerdp-2:3.10.3-5.el10_1.5 | 2026-04-07 | redhat |
| redhat | freerdp-2:2.11.7-1.el9_6.7 | 2026-04-07 | redhat |
| redhat | freerdp-2:2.11.7-6.el8_10 | 2026-04-07 | redhat |
| redhat | freerdp-2:2.11.7-1.el9_7.5 | 2026-04-01 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| freerdp2 | 2.10.0+dfsg1-1 ... 2.9.0+dfsg1-1~bpo11+1 (32 versions) |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| freerdp2 | 2.10.0+dfsg1-1 ... 2.11.7+dfsg1-6~deb12u1 (13 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| freerdp3 | 3.15.0+dfsg-2.1, 3.15.0+dfsg-2.1+deb13u1 |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| freerdp3 | 3.15.0+dfsg-2.1 ... 3.23.0+dfsg-1~bpo13+1 (21 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(1)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 77× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 97 of 226 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 3 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 129 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 09:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 09:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-11-01 07:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 07:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-31 06:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 06:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-30 05:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 05:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-29 04:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 04:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-28 02:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 02:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-27 01:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 01:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-25 20:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 20:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:36 UTCEG score recompute
Show 72 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-24 18:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 18:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-23 17:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 17:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 16:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-21 14:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 14:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-20 13:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 13:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-19 12:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 12:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-18 10:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 03:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-17 09:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 09:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-16 08:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 08:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-15 06:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 06:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-14 02:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 02:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-12 22:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 22:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 08:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 19:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-11 11:14 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-09-21 22:46 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-02 19:08 UTCOSV refresh
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:13:freerdp3
- CVE-2026-67289NVD 7.5EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-66402EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-64620NVD 9.1EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-57156EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-45700EG 9.8EPSS p93CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-31883EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-25959EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-25955EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-25953EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-25997EG 9.8CRITICAL
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:10076
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-31806?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-31806 published?
Is CVE-2026-31806 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-31806?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-31806?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-31806
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-31806?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.