jackson-databind contains the general-purpose data-binding functionality and tree-model for Jackson Data Processor. From 2.10.0 until 2.18.8, 2.21.4, and 3.1.4, jackson-databind's PolymorphicTypeValidator (PTV) is the primary safety mechanism guarding polymorphic deserialization. When polymorphic typing is enabled and a type identifier contains generic parameters (i.e. the type ID string contains <), DatabindContext._resolveAndValidateGeneric() validates only the raw container class name (the substring before <) against the configured PTV. If the container type is approved, the method parses the full canonical type string via TypeFactory.constructFromCanonical() and returns the fully parameterized type without ever validating the nested type arguments against the PTV. The nested type arguments are then resolved, instantiated, and populated as beans during deserialization. An attacker who controls the type ID can therefore place a denied class as a generic type parameter of an allowed container — for example java.util.ArrayList when only java.util.ArrayList is allow-listed. The container passes the PTV check; com.evil.Gadget is loaded via Class.forName(name, true, loader), instantiated, and its properties are set from attacker-controlled JSON. This completely bypasses an explicitly configured PTV allow-list. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.18.8, 2.21.4, and 3.1.4.
CVE-2026-54512
This high-severity CVE scores 8.1 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6%, top 54% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.1
- EG Score
- 8.1(medium)
- EPSS
- 45.9%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
June 23, 2026
Last Modified
June 27, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Jun 24, 2026PolymorphicTypeValidator bypass via generic type parameters in jackson-databind allows arbitrary class instantiation · Advisory · FasterXML/jackson-databind · GitHub
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/security/advisories/GHSA-j3rv-43j4-c7qm`PolymorphicTypeValidator` needs to validate generic type parameters too [CVE-2026-54512] by cowtowncoder · Pull Request #5988 · FasterXML/jackson-databind · GitHub
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/5988commit 434d6c511de7 (FasterXML/jackson-databind)
Fix landed in FasterXML/jackson-databind commit 434d6c511de7 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/commit/434d6c511de7fdd9872f29157aafb6162d12d8d5Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-54512(4)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:41951Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.2 security update
- RHSA-2026:40895Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: jackson-annotations, jackson-core, jackson-databind, jackson-jaxrs-providers, and jackson-modules-base security update
- RHSA-2026:36839Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Build of Apache Camel 4.18 for Quarkus 3.33 update is now available (RHBQ 3.33.2.SP2)
- GHSA-j3rv-43j4-c7qmGitHub Security AdvisoriesHigh
jackson-databind has a PolymorphicTypeValidator bypass via generic type parameters that allows arbitrary class instantiation
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | jackson-databind | 2026-07-08 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(2 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind | 2.10.0 ... 2.18.7 (74 versions) | 2.18.8 | — |
| tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind | 3.0.0 ... 3.1.3 (10 versions) | 3.1.4 | — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 59× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-16 21:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-16 09:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-15 20:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 08:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-14 19:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-14 06:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-13 22:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 18:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 05:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-12 17:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 34 moreShow fewer
- 2026-07-12 04:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-11 16:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 03:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-10 14:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-10 02:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 13:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-09 01:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-05 02:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-502
- CVE-2017-20208EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-20207EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-20206EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-20189EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-10992EG 9.8EPSS 95%CRITICAL
- CVE-2013-4521EG 9.8EPSS 90%CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-1860EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-1000027EG 9.8EPSS 98%CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-3699EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-18605EG 9.8CRITICAL
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-54512?
When was CVE-2026-54512 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-54512 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-54512?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-54512?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-54512
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-54512?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.