jackson-databind's deserializer for java.nio.file.Path resolves an attacker-supplied URI without restricting the URI scheme. In JDKFromStringDeserializer.NioPathHelper.deserialize, a string bound from untrusted JSON is passed to new URI(value) and then to Path.of(uri). When that throws FileSystemNotFoundException, the code enumerates ServiceLoader and calls provider.getPath(uri) on the first provider whose scheme matches the attacker-chosen scheme. Untrusted JSON can therefore select and drive an arbitrary registered FileSystemProvider during readValue under a default JsonMapper, and forces provider class loading at the same time. With only the JDK built-in providers (file, jar/zipfs) present, the resolved path is inert and no mount or network I/O occurs; further impact requires a side-effecting third-party FileSystemProvider on the classpath. This affects com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind from 2.8.0 before 2.18.10, from 2.19.0 before 2.21.6, and from 2.22.0 before 2.22.2, and tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind from 3.0.0 before 3.1.6 and from 3.2.0 before 3.2.2. Users should upgrade to 2.18.10, 2.21.6, 2.22.2, 3.1.6, or 3.2.2. Binding java.nio.file.Path from untrusted JSON should be avoided regardless of version.
CVE-2026-19032
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 5.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-09-28. A secondary CVSS source baseline 5.3; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2026-68961 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-wjgm-6hv5-3cvf (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
Fixed versions, as the CVE record's CNA (HeroDevs) states them: "Upgrade to jackson-databind 2.18.10, 2.21.6, 2.22.2 (com.fasterxml.jackson.core) or 3.1.6, 3.2.2 (tools.jackson.core)."
- CVSS v3
- 5.3
- EG Score
- 5.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 55EG Risk 55/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity53% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 47th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 1, 2026
Last Modified
September 8, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Sep 1, 2026Path Deserialization Missing Scheme Allowlist for FileSystemProvider Resolution · Advisory · FasterXML/jackson-databind · GitHub
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/security/advisories/GHSA-wjgm-6hv5-3cvfLimit the supported URL schemes for `java.nio.file.Path` deserialization [CVE-2026-19032]
Fix merged in FasterXML/jackson-databind PR #6129 on 2026-08-06 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/pull/6129commit d94bb632becf (FasterXML/jackson-databind)
Fix landed in FasterXML/jackson-databind commit d94bb632becf — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/commit/d94bb632becfe0ba96926b9909ab06d1f87aad6dcommit ce26eda3481c (FasterXML/jackson-databind)
Fix landed in FasterXML/jackson-databind commit ce26eda3481c — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/commit/ce26eda3481cd796f76ba4c53ffe1da23b53f166commit cc6756b61ed9 (FasterXML/jackson-databind)
Fix landed in FasterXML/jackson-databind commit cc6756b61ed9 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/commit/cc6756b61ed90b6b9227f670e0408d5d9bd48551Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-19032(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:83520Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.33.4 release and security update
- RHSA-2026:83082Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.27.6 release and security update
- GHSA-wjgm-6hv5-3cvfGitHub Security AdvisoriesMedium
jackson-databind: Path Deserialization Missing Scheme Allowlist for FileSystemProvider Resolution
Patch Availability(6)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | com.fasterxml.jackson.core/jackson-databind:2.21.7.redhat-00001 | 2026-10-15 | redhat |
| maven | com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind @ 2.18.10 (fixes >= 2.8.0, < 2.18.10) | — | ghsa |
| maven | com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind @ 2.21.6 (fixes >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.6) | — | ghsa |
| maven | com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind @ 2.22.2 (fixes >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.2) | — | ghsa |
| maven | tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind @ 3.1.6 (fixes >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.6) | — | ghsa |
| maven | tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind @ 3.2.2 (fixes >= 3.2.0, < 3.2.2) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Maven(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind | 2.22.0, 2.22.1 |
| — |
| tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind | 3.2.0, 3.2.1 |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| jackson-databind | 2.14.0+ds-1, 2.14.0+ds-2, 2.14.0-1, 2.14.0-1+deb12u1 |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| jackson-databind | 2.14.0+ds-1, 2.14.0+ds-1+deb13u1, 2.14.0+ds-2 |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| jackson-databind | 2.14.0+ds-1, 2.14.0+ds-2 |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-11-01 07:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wjgm-6hv5-3cvf · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-11-01 07:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-31 06:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-23 05:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 05:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
Show 73 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 20:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-10 05:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-09 02:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-07 09:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-06 07:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-05 04:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-04 02:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 00:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 21:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-30 19:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-29 12:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-28 10:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-27 08:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-26 07:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 01:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 00:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 22:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 20:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 16:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-18 14:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 13:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-16 10:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-15 08:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 06:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-13 05:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-12 03:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-11 01:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-09 23:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-08 01:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-06 23:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-05 21:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 20:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-02 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-01 14:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 03:30 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 5.3 MEDIUM
- 2026-09-01 03:29 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownMaven:tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:83082
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-470 · CWE-610
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-19032?
When was CVE-2026-19032 made public?
Is CVE-2026-19032 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-19032?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-19032?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-19032
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-19032?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.