CVE-2026-53154

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-06-25. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths

Two sites in mm/hugetlb.c allocate a hugetlb folio via alloc_hugetlb_folio() (consuming a VMA reservation) and then call copy_user_large_folio(), which became int-returning in commit 1cb9dc4b475c ("mm: hwpoison: support recovery from HugePage copy-on-write faults") and can now fail (e.g. -EHWPOISON on a hwpoisoned source page). On the failure path, folio_put() restores the global hugetlb pool count through free_huge_folio(), but the per-VMA reservation map entry is left marked consumed:

  • hugetlb_mfill_atomic_pte() resubmission path (UFFDIO_COPY)
  • copy_hugetlb_page_range() fork-time CoW path when
hugetlb_try_dup_anon_rmap() fails (rare: pinned hugetlb anon folio under fork)

User-visible effect: on UFFDIO_COPY into a private hugetlb VMA where the resubmission copy fails, the reservation for that address is leaked from the VMA's reserve map. A subsequent fault at the same address takes the no-reservation path, and under hugetlb pool pressure the task is SIGBUSed at an address it had previously reserved. The fork-time CoW path leaks the same way in the child VMA's reserve map, though it requires the much rarer combination of pinned hugetlb anon page + hwpoisoned source.

Add the missing restore_reserve_on_error() call before folio_put() on both error paths.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(high)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
2.3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 25, 2026

Last Modified

July 7, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jul 7, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e47bf16af3c45470ea32f2241fa69aefe0dd61bd
generic

mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c72469ac0f274bde3f0df60a4584e14a123d0aa6
generic

mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8d6e1dd3ad1340cd8b6d554b7aa93d8f0a1c6d38
generic

mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/45e33d43243d71d089af42f5077b8213cee6610f
generic

mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/40c81856e622a9dc59294a90d169ac07ea25b0b0

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53154(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 67× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-23 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-16 20:06 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-07-16 20:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 20:31 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-07-15 20:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-14 21:47 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-07-14 21:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-07-13 23:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-07-13 22:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 00:19 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-07-13 00:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-12 01:34 UTCVendor advisory
Show 42 more
  1. 2026-07-12 01:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-11 02:50 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-07-11 02:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-07-10 04:06 UTCEG score recompute 5.50
  7. 2026-07-10 04:06 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-07-10 04:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-07 20:14 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 5.5 · severity → MEDIUM
  14. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-07 05:19 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-07-07 05:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-05 02:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-07-01 07:43 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-07-01 07:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-28 08:56 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-06-28 08:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-25 10:09 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-06-25 10:09 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53154?
CVE-2026-53154 is a medium vulnerability published on June 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths Two sites in mm/hugetlb.c allocate a hugetlb folio via allochugetlbfolio() (consuming a VMA reservation) and then call copyuserlarge_folio(), which became…
When was CVE-2026-53154 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53154 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 25, 2026, with the most recent update on July 7, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-53154 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53154 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 2.3% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53154?
CVE-2026-53154 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53154?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-53154, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-53154

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53154?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.