CVE-2026-47719

HIGHPre-NVD 8.28.2
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

Score 8.2 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-06-08. the CNA's CVSS baseline 8.2; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:github_m, epss, ghsa
8.2
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 8.2Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

FUXA: Unauthenticated SSRF via Socket.IO DEVICE_WEBAPI_REQUEST and DEVICE_PROPERTY with response reading

Summary

An unauthenticated attacker (Alice) connects to FUXA's Socket.IO endpoint and emits a device-webapi-request event whose property.address field names an arbitrary URL. FUXA's DEVICE_WEBAPI_REQUEST handler at server/runtime/index.js:296 calls axios.get(address) server-side and broadcasts the full response body back on the same event via io.emit. The companion handler DEVICE_PROPERTY at server/runtime/index.js:153 has the same miss against OPC UA and ODBC endpoints. Both handlers skip the isSocketWriteAuthorized() check that the other write-capable events (DEVICE_VALUES at line 182, DEVICE_ENABLE at line 358) call. Alice reads cloud instance metadata, scans internal services, and connects to any OPC UA server or ODBC database the FUXA host can reach, then receives the results.

Details

Vulnerable handlers: server/runtime/index.js:153-171, 296-316:

socket.on(Events.IoEventTypes.DEVICE_PROPERTY, (message) => {
    try {
        if (message && message.endpoint && message.type) {
            devices.getSupportedProperty(message.endpoint, message.type).then(result => {
                message.result = result;
                io.emit(Events.IoEventTypes.DEVICE_PROPERTY, message);
            })
            // ...
        }
    }
    // ...
});

socket.on(Events.IoEventTypes.DEVICE_WEBAPI_REQUEST, (message) => { try { if (message && message.property) { devices.getRequestResult(message.property).then(result => { message.result = result; io.emit(Events.IoEventTypes.DEVICE_WEBAPI_REQUEST, message); }) // ... } } // ... });

Sink: server/runtime/devices/httprequest/index.js:471 for the webapi path:

if (property.method === 'GET') {
    axios.get(property.address).then(res => {
        resolve(res.data);
    // ...

Alice fully controls property.address, and io.emit echoes the response body back on the same event. For the ODBC variant, server/runtime/devices/odbc/index.js builds the connection string from endpoint.address plus endpoint.uid and endpoint.pwd, so Alice supplies credentials and targets any reachable ODBC server.

Contrast: server/runtime/index.js:182 (the DEVICE_VALUES write handler) gates the exact same kind of action behind isSocketWriteAuthorized(socket). The two handlers above skip that check.

Reachability: neither handler performs any authorization check, so both modes reach the sinks. secureEnabled=true does not close the gap because the Socket.IO connect block at server/runtime/index.js:114-120 auto-issues a guest token to any client that connects without one, and the handlers run regardless of socket.isAuthenticated. This is the same pattern GHSA-vwcg-c828-9822's note warned about: enabling authentication does not mitigate the missing check here.

Impact

Alice uses FUXA as a read-SSRF oracle against any HTTP(S) service the FUXA host can reach, with the response body delivered back to her Socket.IO session. On cloud-hosted SCADA deployments this exfiltrates IAM credentials from the instance metadata service. On OT networks it reaches internal OPC UA servers, ODBC databases, and administrative consoles that have no other external exposure. The ODBC variant accepts attacker-supplied credentials, so Alice authenticates to any ODBC server that trusts connections from the FUXA host. The attack works against secureEnabled=true deployments as well as the default; no operator interaction required.

CVSS 3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N (High, 8.2). CWE-918.

Recommended Fix

Add the existing isSocketWriteAuthorized(socket) check at the top of both handlers, matching the pattern used by DEVICE_VALUES and DEVICE_ENABLE. Also switch io.emit to socket.emit so the response scopes to the requesting socket instead of broadcasting to every connected client. For defense in depth, validate property.address against an allowlist of schemes and reject private, loopback, and link-local address ranges before calling axios.get or the device connect paths.

socket.on(Events.IoEventTypes.DEVICE_WEBAPI_REQUEST, (message) => {
    try {
        if (!isSocketWriteAuthorized(socket)) {
            logger.warn(${Events.IoEventTypes.DEVICE_WEBAPI_REQUEST}: unauthorized request from ${socket.userId || 'guest'});
            return;
        }
        if (message && message.property) {
            // ... validate property.address against allowlist ...
            devices.getRequestResult(message.property).then(result => {
                message.result = result;
                socket.emit(Events.IoEventTypes.DEVICE_WEBAPI_REQUEST, message);
            })
            // ...
        }
    }
    // ...
});

Apply the same three changes (auth check, socket.emit, address validation) to DEVICE_PROPERTY.


A fix is available at https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/releases/tag/v1.3.2.


*Found by aisafe.io*

CVSS v3
8.2
EG Score
8.2(low)
EG Risk
EPSS
27.5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 8, 2026

Last Modified

June 8, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-47719(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
npmfuxa-serverghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
fuxa-server

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 1× in last 7d / 37× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-16 09:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-07-15 20:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-07-14 13:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-07-14 02:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-07-12 09:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-07-11 19:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-07-11 08:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-07-10 21:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-07-09 03:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-07-08 15:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-07-08 02:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-07-05 17:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-07-05 03:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-07-04 14:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-07-03 16:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-07-03 03:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-07-02 16:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-07-02 05:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-07-01 18:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-07-01 06:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-06-30 17:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-06-30 06:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-06-29 19:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-06-29 07:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-06-28 20:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 45 more
  1. 2026-06-28 09:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-06-27 22:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-06-27 10:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-06-26 23:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-06-26 12:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-06-25 23:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-06-25 12:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-06-25 01:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-06-24 14:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-06-24 02:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-06-23 15:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-06-23 00:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-06-22 13:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-06-21 19:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-06-21 02:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-06-20 13:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-06-20 02:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-06-19 14:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-06-19 03:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-06-18 16:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-06-18 04:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-06-17 17:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-06-17 06:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-06-16 19:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-06-16 07:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-06-15 20:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-06-15 09:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-14 22:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-06-14 11:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-06-14 00:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-13 13:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-06-13 02:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-12 15:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-06-12 04:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-06-11 17:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-06-11 06:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-06-10 19:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-06-10 08:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-06-09 21:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-06-09 10:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-06-08 23:08 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-06-08 23:08 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-47719?
CVE-2026-47719 is a high vulnerability published on June 8, 2026. FUXA: Unauthenticated SSRF via Socket.IO DEVICEWEBAPIREQUEST and DEVICE_PROPERTY with response reading Summary An unauthenticated attacker (Alice) connects to FUXA's Socket.IO endpoint and emits a device-webapi-request event whose property.address field names an arbitrary URL. FUXA's…
When was CVE-2026-47719 disclosed?
CVE-2026-47719 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 8, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-47719 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-47719 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 27.5% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-47719?
CVE-2026-47719 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 8.2 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-47719?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-47719, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-47719

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-47719?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.