Papra is a minimalistic document management and archiving platform. Prior to version 26.5.0, Papra's webhook delivery system contains an SSRF protection bypass that allows any authenticated organisation member to cause the server to make HTTP requests to internal addresses — loopback, link-local, and RFC-1918 ranges. The SSRF protection validates the registered webhook URL but ignores redirect destinations. The HTTP client (ofetch) follows 3xx responses automatically, and the redirect target is never checked against the blocklist. An attacker registers a webhook pointing to an attacker-controlled server, which redirects incoming POSTs to any internal address. Exploitation was confirmed by live test against the official Docker image. The fix is a single-line change to the webhook HTTP client. This issue has been patched in version 26.5.0.
CVE-2026-48051
This low-severity CVE scores 3.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.0%, top 93% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 3.5
- EG Score
- 3.5(low)
- EG Risk
- 20(Track)EG Risk 20/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity35% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 7%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
June 10, 2026
Last Modified
July 27, 2026
References (1)
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/papra-hq/papra/security/advisories/GHSA-5g86-85rp-f9hx
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-48051(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| @papra/webhooks | — | 0.3.3 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 3× in last 7d / 3× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-27 18:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-26 21:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 03:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-10 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-918
- CVE-2016-10927EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-10926EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-10511EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-1000124EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-11291EG 10.0EPSS p92CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-12905EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-8794EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-13667EG 9.9CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-17674EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2013-4864EG 9.8EPSS p93CRITICAL
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-48051?
When was CVE-2026-48051 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-48051 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48051?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-48051?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-48051
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-48051?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.