CVE-2026-41197

CRITICALNVD 9.39.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.3 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.4%, top 68% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
9.3
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 9.3Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Noir is a Domain Specific Language for SNARK proving systems that is designed to use any ACIR compatible proving system, and Brillig is the bytecode ACIR uses for non-determinism. Noir programs can invoke external functions through foreign calls. When compiling to Brillig bytecode, the SSA instructions are processed block-by-block in BrilligBlock::compile_block(). When the compiler encounters an Instruction::Call with a Value::ForeignFunction target, it invokes codegen_call() in brillig_call/code_gen_call.rs, which dispatches to convert_ssa_foreign_call(). Before emitting the foreign call opcode, the compiler must pre-allocate memory for any array results the call will return. This happens through allocate_external_call_results(), which iterates over the result types. For Type::Array results, it delegates to allocate_foreign_call_result_array() to recursively allocate memory on the heap for nested arrays. The BrilligArray struct is the internal representation of a Noir array in Brillig IR. Its size field represents the semi-flattened size, the total number of memory slots the array occupies, accounting for the fact that composite types like tuples consume multiple slots per element. This size is computed by compute_array_length() in brillig_block_variables.rs. For the outer array, allocate_external_call_results() correctly uses define_variable(), which internally calls allocate_value_with_type(). This function applies the formula above, producing the correct semi-flattened size. However, for nested arrays, allocate_foreign_call_result_array() contains a bug. The pattern Type::Array(_, nested_size) discards the inner types with _ and uses only nested_size, the semantic length of the nested array (the number of logical elements), not the semi-flattened size. For simple element types this works correctly, but for composite element types it under-allocates. Foreign calls returning nested arrays of tuples or other composite types corrupt the Brillig VM heap. Version 1.0.0-beta.19 fixes this issue.

CVSS v3
9.3
EG Score
9.3(medium)
EG Risk
57(Track)
EG Risk 57/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity93% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
32.1%
KEV
Not listed

Published

April 23, 2026

Last Modified

April 29, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Apr 29, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github.
github Patch Available

Heap corruption in foreign call results with nested tuple arrays · Advisory · noir-lang/noir · GitHub

https://github.com/noir-lang/noir/security/advisories/GHSA-jj7c-x25r-r8r3
generic

Release v1.0.0-beta.19 · noir-lang/noir · GitHub

https://github.com/noir-lang/noir/releases/tag/v1.0.0-beta.19

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
crates.io(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
brillig1.0.0-beta.19

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-23 03:11 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-20 22:02 UTCOSV refresh
  5. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 65 more
  1. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-02 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-26 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-20 22:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-20 22:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-20 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-05-20 11:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-20 11:22 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-41197?
CVE-2026-41197 is a critical vulnerability published on April 23, 2026. Noir is a Domain Specific Language for SNARK proving systems that is designed to use any ACIR compatible proving system, and Brillig is the bytecode ACIR uses for non-determinism. Noir programs can invoke external functions through foreign calls. When compiling to Brillig bytecode, the SSA…
When was CVE-2026-41197 disclosed?
CVE-2026-41197 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on April 23, 2026, with the most recent update on April 29, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-41197 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-41197 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 32.1% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-41197?
CVE-2026-41197 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.3 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-41197?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-41197, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-41197

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-41197?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.