Wings is the server control plane for Pterodactyl, a free, open-source game server management panel. Prior to version 1.12.1, a missing authorization check in multiple controllers allows any user with access to a node secret token to fetch information about any server on a Pterodactyl instance, even if that server is associated with a different node. This issue stems from missing logic to verify that the node requesting server data is the same node that the server is associated with. Any authenticated Wings node can retrieve server installation scripts (potentially containing secret values) and manipulate the installation status of servers belonging to other nodes. Wings nodes may also manipulate the transfer status of servers belonging to other nodes. This vulnerability requires a user to acquire a secret access token for a node. Unless a user gains access to a Wings secret access token they would not be able to access any of these vulnerable endpoints, as every endpoint requires a valid node access token. A single compromised Wings node daemon token (stored in plaintext at /etc/pterodactyl/config.yml) grants access to sensitive configuration data of every server on the panel, rather than only to servers that the node has access to. An attacker can use this information to move laterally through the system, send excessive notifications, destroy server data on other nodes, and otherwise exfiltrate secrets that they should not have access to with only a node token. Additionally, triggering a false transfer success causes the panel to delete the server from the source node, resulting in permanent data loss. Users should upgrade to version 1.12.1 to receive a fix.
CVE-2026-26016
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This high-severity CVE scores 8.1 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (29th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-8438 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-g7vw-f8p5-c728 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.1
- EG Score
- 8.1HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 37EG Risk 37/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity81% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 29th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 8.1 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
February 19, 2026
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 2, 2026Cross-Node Server Configuration Disclosure via Remote API Missing Authorization · Advisory · pterodactyl/panel · GitHub
https://github.com/pterodactyl/panel/security/advisories/GHSA-g7vw-f8p5-c728v1.12.1
Patch available: pterodactyl/panel v1.12.1
https://github.com/pterodactyl/panel/releases/tag/v1.12.1Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| composer | pterodactyl/panel @ 1.12.1 (fixes < 1.12.1) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Packagist(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| pterodactyl/panel | v0.1.0-beta ... v1.9.2 (119 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 99 of 104 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 5 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-11-01 14:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g7vw-f8p5-c728 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-11-01 07:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g7vw-f8p5-c728 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-11-01 07:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 03:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
Show 74 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 20:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-09 08:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:03 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-31 18:34 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-14 09:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-13 01:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-12 02:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-11 07:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-09 21:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-09 09:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-07 21:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-06 03:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-02 20:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownPackagist:pterodactyl/panel
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-26016?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-26016 published?
Is CVE-2026-26016 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-26016?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-26016?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-26016
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-26016?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.