CVE-2026-25087

HIGHNVD 7.07.0
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.0 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-02-17. NVD baseline CVSS 7.0; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-8013 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-rgxp-2hwp-jwgg (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.9%CVSS: 7.0Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Use After Free vulnerability in Apache Arrow C++.

This issue affects Apache Arrow C++ from 15.0.0 through 23.0.0. It can be triggered when reading an Arrow IPC file (but not an IPC stream) with pre-buffering enabled, if the IPC file contains data with variadic buffers (such as Binary View and String View data). Depending on the number of variadic buffers in a record batch column and on the temporal sequence of multi-threaded IO, a write to a dangling pointer could occur. The value (a std::shared_ptr object) that is written to the dangling pointer is not under direct control of the attacker.

Pre-buffering is disabled by default but can be enabled using a specific C++ API call (RecordBatchFileReader::PreBufferMetadata). The functionality is not exposed in language bindings (Python, Ruby, C GLib), so these bindings are not vulnerable.

The most likely consequence of this issue would be random crashes or memory corruption when reading specific kinds of IPC files. If the application allows ingesting IPC files from untrusted sources, this could plausibly be exploited for denial of service. Inducing more targeted kinds of misbehavior (such as confidential data extraction from the running process) depends on memory allocation and multi-threaded IO temporal patterns that are unlikely to be easily controlled by an attacker.

Advice for users of Arrow C++:

  • check whether you enable pre-buffering on the IPC file reader (using RecordBatchFileReader::PreBufferMetadata)
  • if so, either disable pre-buffering (which may have adverse performance consequences), or switch to Arrow 23.0.1 which is not vulnerable

CVSS v3
7.0
EG Score
7.0HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
32
EG Risk 32/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity70% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.9% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.9%
EPSS %ILE
59th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.0 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

February 17, 2026

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Aug 2, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_pr.
Web page

oss-security - CVE-2026-25087: Apache Arrow: Potential use-after-free when reading IPC file with pre-buffering

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/02/17/4
GitHub pull request

GH-48924: [C++][CI] Fix pre-buffering issues in IPC file reader

Fix merged in apache/arrow PR #48925 on 2026-01-26 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/48925

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-25087(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhaiis/model-opt-cuda-rhel9:17877721572026-08-31redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-arrow22.0.0-1, 23.0.0-1
  • every version up to 23.0.1-1: fixed in 23.0.1-1
—
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
pyarrow15.0.0 ... 23.0.0 (14 versions)
  • 15.0.0 up to 23.0.1: fixed in 23.0.1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 212 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 113 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  3. 2026-11-01 06:00 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-11-01 06:00 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  6. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  7. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  8. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  9. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  10. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 14:40 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 23:25 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-24 23:25 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  16. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  17. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  18. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  19. 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  20. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 03:53 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-17 16:51 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 16:51 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  2. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  3. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  4. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  5. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  6. 2026-10-12 16:19 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 20:01 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 17:14 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 14:46 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  11. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  12. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  13. 2026-10-09 09:28 UTCOSV refresh
  14. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  15. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  16. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  17. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  18. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  19. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  20. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  21. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  22. 2026-09-29 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  23. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  24. 2026-09-27 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  25. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  26. 2026-09-26 00:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  27. 2026-09-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  28. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  29. 2026-09-19 17:00 UTCOSV refresh
  30. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  31. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  32. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  33. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  34. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  35. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  36. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  37. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  38. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  39. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  40. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  41. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  42. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  43. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  44. 2026-08-31 20:05 UTCOSV refresh
  45. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  46. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  47. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  48. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  49. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  50. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  51. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  52. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  53. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  54. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  55. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  56. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  57. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  58. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  59. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  60. 2026-08-14 09:55 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  62. 2026-08-13 02:15 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  64. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  65. 2026-08-11 07:44 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  67. 2026-08-09 14:22 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  69. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  70. 2026-08-07 21:50 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  72. 2026-08-06 03:40 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  74. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-25087?
CVE-2026-25087 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on February 17, 2026. Use After Free vulnerability in Apache Arrow C++. This issue affects Apache Arrow C++ from 15.0.0 through 23.0.0. It can be triggered when reading an Arrow IPC file (but not an IPC stream) with pre-buffering enabled, if the IPC file contains data with variadic buffers (such as Binary View and…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-25087 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-25087 was published on February 17, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-25087 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-25087 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.9% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (59th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-25087?
CVE-2026-25087 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.0 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-25087?
A fix for CVE-2026-25087 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-25087 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-25087

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-25087?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.