CVE-2026-23217

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-02-18. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2026-8018 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-787p-86v4-hhfg (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

riscv: trace: fix snapshot deadlock with sbi ecall

If sbi_ecall.c's functions are traceable,

echo "__sbi_ecall:snapshot" > /sys/kernel/tracing/set_ftrace_filter

may get the kernel into a deadlock.

(Functions in sbi_ecall.c are excluded from tracing if CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE_EARLY is set.)

__sbi_ecall triggers a snapshot of the ringbuffer. The snapshot code raises an IPI interrupt, which results in another call to __sbi_ecall and another snapshot...

All it takes to get into this endless loop is one initial __sbi_ecall. On RISC-V systems without SSTC extension, the clock events in timer-riscv.c issue periodic sbi ecalls, making the problem easy to trigger.

Always exclude the sbi_ecall.c functions from tracing to fix the potential deadlock.

sbi ecalls can easiliy be logged via trace events, excluding ecall functions from function tracing is not a big limitation.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
3rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

February 18, 2026

Last Modified

October 21, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 9, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

riscv: trace: fix snapshot deadlock with sbi ecall - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b1f8285bc8e3508c1fde23b5205f1270215d4984
Web page

riscv: trace: fix snapshot deadlock with sbi ecall - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b0d7f5f0c9f05f1b6d4ee7110f15bef9c11f9df0

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-23217(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.18.10 (fixes >=6.11.0)—osv
linuxKernel @ 6.12.114 (fixes >=6.11.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (181 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.18~rc7-1~exp1 (100 versions)
  • every version up to 6.18.10-1: fixed in 6.18.10-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 35× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 83 is merged into the row it repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  3. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  5. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  6. 2026-10-29 07:25 UTCOSV refresh
  7. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  8. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  9. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 14:41 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  13. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  14. 2026-10-21 13:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-787p-86v4-hhfg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  15. 2026-10-21 12:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-787p-86v4-hhfg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  16. 2026-10-21 12:29 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-21 12:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-787p-86v4-hhfg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  18. 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 03:54 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  21. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  22. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  23. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  24. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  25. 2026-10-12 16:21 UTCEG score recompute
Show 57 more
  1. 2026-10-11 20:03 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 17:16 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  5. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  6. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  7. 2026-10-08 15:05 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  9. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  10. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  11. 2026-09-27 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  12. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  13. 2026-09-26 00:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  14. 2026-09-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  15. 2026-09-18 20:50 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  17. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  18. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  19. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  20. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  21. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  22. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  23. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  24. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  25. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  26. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  27. 2026-08-30 23:57 UTCOSV refresh
  28. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  29. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  30. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  31. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  32. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  33. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  34. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  35. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  36. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  37. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  38. 2026-08-14 09:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-787p-86v4-hhfg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  39. 2026-08-13 02:07 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-13 02:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-787p-86v4-hhfg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  41. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  42. 2026-08-11 07:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-787p-86v4-hhfg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  43. 2026-08-09 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-09 14:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-787p-86v4-hhfg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  45. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  46. 2026-08-07 21:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-787p-86v4-hhfg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  47. 2026-08-06 03:35 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-06 03:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-787p-86v4-hhfg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  49. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  50. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  51. 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  52. 2026-08-02 20:21 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-02 20:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-787p-86v4-hhfg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  54. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  55. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  56. 2026-07-27 13:28 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 5.5 MEDIUM
  57. 2026-07-27 13:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-787p-86v4-hhfg · GitHub CVSS 5.5

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-23217?
CVE-2026-23217 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on February 18, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: riscv: trace: fix snapshot deadlock with sbi ecall If sbi_ecall.c's functions are traceable, echo "__sbi_ecall:snapshot" > /sys/kernel/tracing/set_ftrace_filter may get the kernel into a deadlock. (Functions in sbi_ecall.c are…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-23217 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-23217 was published on February 18, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 21, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-23217 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-23217 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (3rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-23217?
CVE-2026-23217 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-23217?
A fix for CVE-2026-23217 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-23217 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-23217

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-23217?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.