CVE-2026-23005

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-01-25. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2026-4627 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-326g-5c6q-7782 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

x86/fpu: Clear XSTATE_BV[i] in guest XSAVE state whenever XFD[i]=1

When loading guest XSAVE state via KVM_SET_XSAVE, and when updating XFD in response to a guest WRMSR, clear XFD-disabled features in the saved (or to be restored) XSTATE_BV to ensure KVM doesn't attempt to load state for features that are disabled via the guest's XFD. Because the kernel executes XRSTOR with the guest's XFD, saving XSTATE_BV[i]=1 with XFD[i]=1 will cause XRSTOR to #NM and panic the kernel.

E.g. if fpu_update_guest_xfd() sets XFD without clearing XSTATE_BV:

------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:1524 at exc_device_not_available+0x101/0x110, CPU#29: amx_test/848 Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass CPU: 29 UID: 1000 PID: 848 Comm: amx_test Not tainted 6.19.0-rc2-ffa07f7fd437-x86_amx_nm_xfd_non_init-vm #171 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:exc_device_not_available+0x101/0x110 Call Trace: asm_exc_device_not_available+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:restore_fpregs_from_fpstate+0x36/0x90 switch_fpu_return+0x4a/0xb0 kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x1245/0x1e40 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x2c3/0x8f0 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8f/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x62/0x940 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

This can happen if the guest executes WRMSR(MSR_IA32_XFD) to set XFD[18] = 1, and a host IRQ triggers kernel_fpu_begin() prior to the vmexit handler's call to fpu_update_guest_xfd().

and if userspace stuffs XSTATE_BV[i]=1 via KVM_SET_XSAVE:

------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:1524 at exc_device_not_available+0x101/0x110, CPU#14: amx_test/867 Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass CPU: 14 UID: 1000 PID: 867 Comm: amx_test Not tainted 6.19.0-rc2-2dace9faccd6-x86_amx_nm_xfd_non_init-vm #168 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:exc_device_not_available+0x101/0x110 Call Trace: asm_exc_device_not_available+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:restore_fpregs_from_fpstate+0x36/0x90 fpu_swap_kvm_fpstate+0x6b/0x120 kvm_load_guest_fpu+0x30/0x80 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x85/0x1e40 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x2c3/0x8f0 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8f/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x62/0x940 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

The new behavior is consistent with the AMX architecture. Per Intel's SDM, XSAVE saves XSTATE_BV as '0' for components that are disabled via XFD (and non-compacted XSAVE saves the initial configuration of the state component):

If XSAVE, XSAVEC, XSAVEOPT, or XSAVES is saving the state component i, the instruction does not generate #NM when XCR0[i] = IA32_XFD[i] = 1; instead, it operates as if XINUSE[i] = 0 (and the state component was in its initial state): it saves bit i of XSTATE_BV field of the XSAVE header as 0; in addition, XSAVE saves the initial configuration of the state component (the other instructions do not save state component i).

Alternatively, KVM could always do XRSTOR with XFD=0, e.g. by using a constant XFD based on the set of enabled features when XSAVEing for a struct fpu_guest. However, having XSTATE_BV[i]=1 for XFD-disabled features can only happen in the above interrupt case, or in similar scenarios involving preemption on preemptible kernels, because fpu_swap_kvm_fpstate()'s call to save_fpregs_to_fpstate() saves the outgoing FPU state with the current XFD; and that is (on all but the first WRMSR to XFD) the guest XFD.

Therefore, XFD can only go out of sync with XSTATE_BV in the above interrupt case, or in similar scenarios involving preemption on preemptible kernels, and it we can consider it (de facto) part of KVM ABI that KVM_GET_XSAVE returns XSTATE_BV[i]=0 for XFD-disabled features.

[Move clea ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
12th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

January 25, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Jul 17, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

x86/fpu: Clear XSTATE_BV[i] in guest XSAVE state whenever XFD[i]=1 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f577508cc8a0adb8b4ebe9480bba7683b6149930
Web page

x86/fpu: Clear XSTATE_BV[i] in guest XSAVE state whenever XFD[i]=1 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eea6f395ca502c4528314c8112da9b5d65f685eb
Web page

x86/fpu: Clear XSTATE_BV[i] in guest XSAVE state whenever XFD[i]=1 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5995c01ba53d84182ecb9492fc4d91cfe8a362d
Web page

x86/fpu: Clear XSTATE_BV[i] in guest XSAVE state whenever XFD[i]=1 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b45f721775947a84996deb5c661602254ce25ce6
Web page

x86/fpu: Clear XSTATE_BV[i] in guest XSAVE state whenever XFD[i]=1 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1e2848bda819af569dfe7ab186223855e092a2cb

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-23005(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(16)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.159-1~deb11u1 (14 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.162-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.162-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (46 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.162-1: fixed in 6.1.162-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.69-1~bpo12+1 (10 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.69-1: fixed in 6.12.69-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.18~rc7-1~exp1 (97 versions)
  • every version up to 6.18.8-1: fixed in 6.18.8-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(15)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 226 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 127 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  4. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  5. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  6. 2026-10-28 12:25 UTCOSV refresh
  7. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  8. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 14:42 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  12. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  13. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  14. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  15. 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  16. 2026-10-19 19:38 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-19 19:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-326g-5c6q-7782 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  18. 2026-10-19 18:33 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-19 18:33 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-19 18:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-326g-5c6q-7782 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  21. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 03:55 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  24. 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  25. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-15 02:49 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-15 02:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-326g-5c6q-7782 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  3. 2026-10-15 01:56 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-15 01:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-326g-5c6q-7782 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  5. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  6. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  7. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  8. 2026-10-12 16:21 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 20:03 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 17:16 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  13. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  14. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  15. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  16. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  17. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  18. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  19. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  20. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  21. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  22. 2026-09-29 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  23. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  24. 2026-09-28 01:32 UTCOSV refresh
  25. 2026-09-27 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  26. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  27. 2026-09-26 00:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  28. 2026-09-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  29. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  30. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  31. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  32. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  33. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  34. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  35. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  36. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  37. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  38. 2026-09-08 09:23 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-08 09:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-326g-5c6q-7782 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  40. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  41. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  42. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  43. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  44. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  45. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  46. 2026-08-31 04:26 UTCOSV refresh
  47. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  48. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  49. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  50. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  51. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  52. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  53. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  54. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  55. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  56. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  57. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  58. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  59. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  60. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  61. 2026-08-14 12:20 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-14 12:20 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-14 12:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-326g-5c6q-7782 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  64. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  65. 2026-08-13 04:39 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-13 04:39 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-13 04:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-326g-5c6q-7782 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  68. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  69. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  70. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  71. 2026-08-09 18:23 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-09 18:23 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-09 18:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-326g-5c6q-7782 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  74. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-23005?
CVE-2026-23005 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on January 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/fpu: Clear XSTATE_BV[i] in guest XSAVE state whenever XFD[i]=1 When loading guest XSAVE state via KVM_SET_XSAVE, and when updating XFD in response to a guest WRMSR, clear XFD-disabled features in the saved (or to be restored)…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-23005 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-23005 was published on January 25, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-23005 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-23005 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (12th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-23005?
CVE-2026-23005 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-23005?
A fix for CVE-2026-23005 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-23005 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-23005

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-23005?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.