In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bonding: annotate data-races around slave->last_rx
slave->last_rx and slave->target_last_arp_rx[...] can be read and written
locklessly. Add READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() annotations.
syzbot reported:
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in bond_rcv_validate / bond_rcv_validate
write to 0xffff888149f0d428 of 8 bytes by interrupt on cpu 1:
bond_rcv_validate+0x202/0x7a0 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:3335
bond_handle_frame+0xde/0x5e0 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:1533
__netif_receive_skb_core+0x5b1/0x1950 net/core/dev.c:6039
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:6150 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x59/0x270 net/core/dev.c:6265
netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:6351 [inline]
netif_receive_skb+0x4b/0x2d0 net/core/dev.c:6410
...
write to 0xffff888149f0d428 of 8 bytes by interrupt on cpu 0:
bond_rcv_validate+0x202/0x7a0 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:3335
bond_handle_frame+0xde/0x5e0 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:1533
__netif_receive_skb_core+0x5b1/0x1950 net/core/dev.c:6039
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:6150 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x59/0x270 net/core/dev.c:6265
netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:6351 [inline]
netif_receive_skb+0x4b/0x2d0 net/core/dev.c:6410
br_netif_receive_skb net/bridge/br_input.c:30 [inline]
NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:318 [inline]
...
value changed: 0x0000000100005365 -> 0x0000000100005366
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (4.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 4.7 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it