CVE-2026-106102

CRITICALPre-NVD 10.010.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 10.0 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-10-07. A secondary CVSS source baseline 10.0; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-93517 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-pq96-jpmf-w254 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

10.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 10.0Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Quasar Framework is a framework for building high-performance Vue.js user interfaces. Prior to 2.22.0, the SSR-only getHead() serializer in ui/src/plugins/meta/Meta.js used getAttr() to interpolate values supplied through useMeta() into title, meta, link, and script markup without HTML text or quoted-attribute encoding. injectServerMeta() appended that output to the raw server-rendered response. An attacker who can influence dynamic page metadata, such as a post title, product name, excerpt, or display name, can terminate the intended HTML context and inject executable markup before hydration. The client-side apply() path is not affected because it uses DOM APIs that encode attributes. This issue is fixed in version 2.22.0.

CVSS v3
10.0
EG Score
10.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
60
EG Risk 60/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity100% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
22nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
10.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 6, 2026

Last Modified

October 6, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Oct 28, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_release, github, github_commit.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Stored/Reflected XSS via unescaped SSR meta tag rendering in getHead() · Advisory · quasarframework/quasar · GitHub

https://github.com/quasarframework/quasar/security/advisories/GHSA-pq96-jpmf-w254
GitHub release Patch Available

quasar-v2.22.0

Patch available: quasarframework/quasar quasar-v2.22.0

https://github.com/quasarframework/quasar/releases/tag/quasar-v2.22.0
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 11505afe5b52 (quasarframework/quasar)

Patch available: quasarframework/quasar quasar-v2.29.0 (contains commit 11505afe5b52)

https://github.com/quasarframework/quasar/commit/11505afe5b5218f2c468f130181815b898fd1e40

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-106102(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
npmquasar @ 2.22.0 (fixes < 2.22.0)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
quasar—
  • every version up to 2.22.0: fixed in 2.22.0
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 60× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-01 20:18 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-01 20:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pq96-jpmf-w254 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  3. 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  4. 2026-11-01 08:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pq96-jpmf-w254 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  5. 2026-11-01 08:00 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-31 18:07 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-30 15:55 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-29 13:44 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-28 11:29 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-27 08:50 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-26 05:03 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-25 14:55 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-25 02:52 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  22. 2026-10-24 00:42 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  24. 2026-10-22 22:30 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
Show 35 more
  1. 2026-10-21 20:16 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  3. 2026-10-20 18:05 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  5. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  6. 2026-10-19 15:53 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-18 05:08 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  9. 2026-10-17 11:30 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  11. 2026-10-16 09:19 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  13. 2026-10-15 07:07 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  15. 2026-10-14 03:00 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  17. 2026-10-12 16:39 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  19. 2026-10-11 20:14 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-11 17:59 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  23. 2026-10-10 22:15 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  25. 2026-10-09 23:01 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  27. 2026-10-08 19:42 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  29. 2026-10-08 03:38 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  31. 2026-10-06 18:31 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-10-06 17:47 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-06 17:19 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-06 17:12 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 10.0 CRITICAL
  35. 2026-10-06 17:12 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-106102?
CVE-2026-106102 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 6, 2026. Quasar Framework is a framework for building high-performance Vue.js user interfaces. Prior to 2.22.0, the SSR-only getHead() serializer in ui/src/plugins/meta/Meta.js used getAttr() to interpolate values supplied through useMeta() into title, meta, link, and script markup without HTML text or…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-106102 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-106102 was published on October 6, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 6, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-106102 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-106102 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (22nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-106102?
CVE-2026-106102 has a CVSS base score of 10.0 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-106102?
A fix for CVE-2026-106102 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-106102 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-106102

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-106102?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.