SimpleChat is a secure AI conversation application with personal and group workspaces for document-grounded interactions. Prior to 0.261.029, POST /api/group_documents/upload stores an attacker-controlled group document filename that group_workspaces.html later interpolates into inline Share event handlers. The escapeGroupHtml function leaves apostrophes unchanged, while escapeHtml produces an HTML entity that the browser decodes before JavaScript evaluation, so either path permits the filename to terminate the handler string. An authenticated group Owner, Admin, or DocumentManager can persist script that executes in the SimpleChat origin when another group member clicks Share, allowing access to victim-visible data and actions with the victim session. This issue is fixed in version 0.261.029.
CVE-2026-105798
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 8.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (40th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-93427 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
The CVE record names the fixed release — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.7
- EG Score
- 8.7HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 55EG Risk 55/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity87% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: The CVE record names the fixed release. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 40th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 8.7 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-26). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
The CVE record names the fixed release. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 6, 2026
Last Modified
October 6, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Oct 6, 2026commit 537a259eb048 (microsoft/simplechat)
Fix landed in microsoft/simplechat commit 537a259eb048 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/microsoft/simplechat/commit/537a259eb048b8f6d1c94193fa0c9683ab0bace9Stored XSS via group document filename in inline onclick handler · Advisory · microsoft/simplechat · GitHub
https://github.com/microsoft/simplechat/security/advisories/GHSA-qwcw-r653-j8c6Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-02 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-27 11:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-18 05:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:39 UTCEG score recompute
Show 17 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-11 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-10 21:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-09 22:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-08 23:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-08 01:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 14:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 14:30 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 8.7 HIGH
- 2026-10-06 14:29 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-105798?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-105798 published?
Is CVE-2026-105798 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-105798?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-105798?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-105798
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-105798?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.