Docling simplifies document processing by parsing diverse formats and providing integrations with the generative AI ecosystem. From 2.94.0 until 2.132.0, callers that opt into LatexBackendOptions(tikz_engine="tectonic") invoke docling/backend/latex/engines/tectonic.py to compile an untrusted TikZ body and document preamble without restricting TeX file primitives including \openin and \openout. Crafted input can read files available to the converter and create or overwrite writable files, and enabling the tikz_engine_allow_shell_escape option additionally permits shell commands through TeX. The default configuration, which does not enable Tectonic rendering, is not affected. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.132.0.
CVE-2026-105744
“▼” beside the score: it is lower than NVD's CVSS score.
Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-10-07. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8; sources differ by 1.3.
Also known asEUVD-2026-92804 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-x3q2-h9hx-4r4j (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 50EG Risk 50/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 30th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 5, 2026
Last Modified
October 7, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Oct 5, 2026Release v2.132.0 (docling-project/docling)
Patch available: docling-project/docling v2.132.0
https://github.com/docling-project/docling/releases/tag/v2.132.0commit 38b6fa0a465d (docling-project/docling)
Patch available: docling-project/docling v2.132.0 (contains commit 38b6fa0a465d)
https://github.com/docling-project/docling/commit/38b6fa0a465d46fdacbbec333f50fa19c4f6b342fix(latex): run Tectonic without shell escape and skip TikZ that references outside files
Patch available: docling-project/docling v2.132.0 (PR #4419 merged 2026-09-29)
https://github.com/docling-project/docling/pull/4419Arbitrary file read/write (and command execution when shell-escape is enabled) when rendering untrusted TikZ with the opt-in Tectonic engine · Advisory · docling-project/docling · GitHub
https://github.com/docling-project/docling/security/advisories/GHSA-x3q2-h9hx-4r4jVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-105744(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:87410Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 2.25.12 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- RHSA-2026:84734Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 3.4.5 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- GHSA-x3q2-h9hx-4r4jGitHub Security AdvisoriesHigh
Docling has arbitrary file read/write (and command execution when shell-escape is enabled) when rendering untrusted TikZ with the opt-in Tectonic engine
Patch Availability(3)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rhoai/odh-feature-server-rhel9:1792148523 | 2026-10-21 | redhat |
| redhat | rhoai/odh-feature-server-rhel9:1791863220 | 2026-10-19 | redhat |
| pip | docling @ 2.132.0 (fixes >= 2.94.0, < 2.132.0) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(2 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| docling | 2.100.0 ... 2.99.0 (45 versions) |
| — |
| docling-slim | 2.100.0 ... 2.99.0 (45 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 52× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-11-01 08:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x3q2-h9hx-4r4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-11-01 08:00 UTCEG score recompute▼ 1.30
- 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-30 19:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 19:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-24 07:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 07:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-18 05:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
Show 27 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-11 20:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-10-11 06:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-10-10 06:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-10-08 19:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-10-08 07:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
- 2026-10-07 19:40 UTCEG score recompute▲ 1.30
- 2026-10-07 19:39 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 8.8
- 2026-10-06 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 18:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
- 2026-10-05 22:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 21:33 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 7.5 HIGH
- 2026-10-05 21:30 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownPyPI:docling-slim · PyPI:docling
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:84734
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-105744?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-105744 published?
Is CVE-2026-105744 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-105744?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-105744?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-105744
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-105744?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.