CVE-2026-102930

HIGHPre-NVD 7.77.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This high-severity CVE scores 7.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (9th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-89462 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-94p9-xgh2-xp45 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

virtualenv is a tool for creating isolated virtual python environments. Prior to 21.7.12, download_wheel() accepts pip and setuptools seed wheels fetched for periodic updates or the --download option without checking their bytes against an authoritative digest equivalent to the embedded wheels' BUNDLE_SHA256 verification. A compromised index, stale mirror, or intercepted TLS connection can substitute a different wheel under the requested distribution, version, and filename, after which virtualenv caches and seeds the attacker-controlled wheel into subsequently created environments. The verification applies to the default PyPI path and is intentionally skipped when PIP_INDEX_URL, PIP_EXTRA_INDEX_URL, or PIP_INDEX configures a custom index that may legitimately publish rebuilt wheels. This issue is fixed in version 21.7.12.

CVSS v3
7.7
EG Score
7.7HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity77% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
9th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.7 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 29, 2026

Last Modified

September 30, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 29, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_pr, github_commit.
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit a01ed3e2f239 (pypa/virtualenv)

Patch available: pypa/virtualenv 21.7.12 (contains commit a01ed3e2f239)

https://github.com/pypa/virtualenv/commit/a01ed3e2f239d6ab1fce62c5c7664ccf268fff6d
GitHub pull request Patch Available

🐛 fix(seed): verify downloaded wheel digests

Patch available: pypa/virtualenv 21.7.12 (PR #3251 merged 2026-09-18)

https://github.com/pypa/virtualenv/pull/3251
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Downloaded seed wheels (pip/setuptools) are not integrity-checked before use · Advisory · pypa/virtualenv · GitHub

https://github.com/pypa/virtualenv/security/advisories/GHSA-94p9-xgh2-xp45

Patch Availability(6)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatansible-automation-platform-26/lightspeed-chatbot-rhel9:17919787982026-10-21redhat
redhatansible-automation-platform-27/eda-controller-rhel9:17921410102026-10-21redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-ta-lmes-job-rhel9:17915535272026-10-21redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-workbench-codeserver-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9:17918254692026-10-21redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-trustyai-nemo-guardrails-server-rhel9:17915561282026-10-19redhat
pipvirtualenv @ 21.7.12 (fixes <= 21.7.11)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-virtualenv20.17.1+ds-1 ... 21.5.1+ds-1 (33 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-virtualenv20.31.2+ds-1 ... 21.5.1+ds-1 (13 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-virtualenv20.31.2+ds-1 ... 21.5.1+ds-1 (12 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
virtualenv0.8 ... 21.7.9 (281 versions)
  • every version up to 21.7.12: fixed in 21.7.12
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 67× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 08:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-94p9-xgh2-xp45 · GitHub severity HIGH
  3. 2026-11-01 08:00 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  6. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  7. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  8. 2026-10-27 20:36 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-27 20:36 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  11. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  13. 2026-10-25 14:56 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  15. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  16. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  18. 2026-10-20 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-20 19:15 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  21. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  23. 2026-10-18 05:10 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 19:48 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-17 19:48 UTCVendor advisory
Show 51 more
  1. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  2. 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  3. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  4. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  5. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  6. 2026-10-12 16:40 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  8. 2026-10-12 02:42 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-11 20:15 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 18:28 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 13:50 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 13:50 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  14. 2026-10-11 00:50 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 00:50 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  17. 2026-10-10 11:50 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-09 22:59 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-09 22:59 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  21. 2026-10-09 10:07 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-08 21:13 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-08 21:13 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  25. 2026-10-08 08:22 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-08 08:22 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  28. 2026-10-07 19:30 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-07 06:29 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-06 17:37 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-10-06 17:37 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  33. 2026-10-06 04:46 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-06 04:46 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  36. 2026-10-05 15:53 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-05 02:39 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-10-05 02:39 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  40. 2026-10-04 13:48 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-04 00:57 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-03 12:06 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-02 23:14 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-01 21:27 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  46. 2026-09-30 15:39 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  48. 2026-09-30 14:31 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-29 21:21 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-29 20:59 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 7.7 HIGH
  51. 2026-09-29 20:58 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-102930?
CVE-2026-102930 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 29, 2026. virtualenv is a tool for creating isolated virtual python environments. Prior to 21.7.12, download_wheel() accepts pip and setuptools seed wheels fetched for periodic updates or the --download option without checking their bytes against an authoritative digest equivalent to the embedded wheels'…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-102930 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-102930 was published on September 29, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 30, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-102930 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-102930 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (9th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-102930?
CVE-2026-102930 has a CVSS base score of 7.7 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-102930?
A fix for CVE-2026-102930 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-102930 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-102930

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-102930?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.