fontTools is a library for manipulating fonts, written in Python. In versions from 4.33.0 to before 4.60.2, the fonttools varLib (or python3 -m fontTools.varLib) script has an arbitrary file write vulnerability that leads to remote code execution when a malicious .designspace file is processed. The vulnerability affects the main() code path of fontTools.varLib, used by the fonttools varLib CLI and any code that invokes fontTools.varLib.main(). This issue has been patched in version 4.60.2.
CVE-2025-66034
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (48th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory CVSS 6.3 is lower than this score; a lower GitHub score revises it only when its advisory is newer than the CVE record's last change, and this advisory (published 2025-12-01) is not newer than that change (2026-10-18), so it does not.
Also known asEUVD-2025-199882 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-768j-98cg-p3fv (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 60EG Risk 60/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 48th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
November 29, 2025
Last Modified
October 18, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Oct 28, 2026Arbitrary File Write and XML injection in fontTools.varLib · Advisory · fonttools/fonttools · GitHub
https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/security/advisories/GHSA-768j-98cg-p3fvcommit a696d5ba9327 (fonttools/fonttools)
Patch available: fonttools/fonttools 4.61.0 (contains commit a696d5ba9327)
https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/commit/a696d5ba93270d5954f98e7cab5ddca8a02c1e32Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-66034(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:3713Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 3.3 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- RHSA-2026:2695Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 2.25.2 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- RHSA-2026:2106Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 2.25.2 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
Patch Availability(5)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | python3-fonttools (4.29.1-2ubuntu0.1~esm1) @ jammy | 2026-11-02 | ubuntu |
| redhat | rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-trustyai-cpu-py312-rhel9:1771874181 | 2026-03-04 | redhat |
| redhat | rhoai/odh-openvino-model-server-rhel9:1770621450 | 2026-02-12 | redhat |
| redhat | rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-trustyai-cpu-py312-rhel9:1770055425 | 2026-02-05 | redhat |
| pip | fonttools @ 4.60.2 (fixes >= 4.33.0, < 4.60.2) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| fonttools | 4.19.1-1 ... 4.62.1-7 (45 versions) |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| fonttools | 4.38.0-1 |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| fonttools | 4.57.0-1 |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| fonttools | 4.57.0-1, 4.57.0-2, 4.57.0-3 |
| — |
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| fonttools | 4.33.0 ... 4.60.1 (71 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(1)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 24× in last 7d / 81× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 98 of 245 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 147 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-11-02 05:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 05:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-02 05:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-768j-98cg-p3fv · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.3
- 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-11-01 08:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-768j-98cg-p3fv · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.3
- 2026-11-01 08:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 06:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 06:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-31 07:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 07:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-30 08:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 08:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-29 09:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 09:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-28 10:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 10:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-27 10:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 10:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
Show 73 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-26 11:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 11:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 12:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 12:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-24 13:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 13:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-23 14:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 14:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-22 14:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 14:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-21 15:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 16:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-19 17:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 17:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-18 18:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 17:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 17:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-18 05:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 18:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 18:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-16 19:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 19:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 16:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-14 10:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 10:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-13 09:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 16:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-12 10:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 20:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-01 08:10 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(4 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (4 GitHub PoCs). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Open source ↗GitHub PoCv3cn4x00/POC-CVE-2025-66034Published Mar 21, 2026
- Open source ↗GitHub PoCLiquid1998/Variatype.htb-CVE-2025-66034Published Mar 16, 2026
- Open source ↗GitHub PoCLiquid-Sec/Variatype.htb-CVE-2025-66034Published Mar 16, 2026
- GitHub PoCsymphony2colour/varlib-cve-2025-66034Published Mar 15, 2026
Proof-of-concept exploit for CVE-2025-66034 in the fontTools variable font generation pipeline. A crafted .designspace file allows control of the output path, enabling arbitrary file writes. The script automates payload creation, font generation, and upload to demonstrate the issue.
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:2106
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2025-66034?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-66034 published?
Is CVE-2025-66034 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-66034?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-66034?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-66034
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-66034?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.