CVE-2025-68156

HIGHNVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2025-12-16. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2025-203831 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-cfpf-hrx2-8rv6 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Expr is an expression language and expression evaluation for Go. Prior to version 1.17.7, several builtin functions in Expr, including flatten, min, max, mean, and median, perform recursive traversal over user-provided data structures without enforcing a maximum recursion depth. If the evaluation environment contains deeply nested or cyclic data structures, these functions may recurse indefinitely until exceed the Go runtime stack limit. This results in a stack overflow panic, causing the host application to crash. While exploitability depends on whether an attacker can influence or inject cyclic or pathologically deep data into the evaluation environment, this behavior represents a denial-of-service (DoS) risk and affects overall library robustness. Instead of returning a recoverable evaluation error, the process may terminate unexpectedly. In affected versions, evaluation of expressions that invoke certain builtin functions on untrusted or insufficiently validated data structures can lead to a process-level crash due to stack exhaustion. This issue is most relevant in scenarios where Expr is used to evaluate expressions against externally supplied or dynamically constructed environments; cyclic references (directly or indirectly) can be introduced into arrays, maps, or structs; and there are no application-level safeguards preventing deeply nested input data. In typical use cases with controlled, acyclic data, the issue may not manifest. However, when present, the resulting panic can be used to reliably crash the application, constituting a denial of service. The issue has been fixed in the v1.17.7 versions of Expr. The patch introduces a maximum recursion depth limit for affected builtin functions. When this limit is exceeded, evaluation aborts gracefully and returns a descriptive error instead of panicking. Additionally, the maximum depth can be customized by users via builtin.MaxDepth, allowing applications with legitimate deep structures to raise the limit in a controlled manner. Users are strongly encouraged to upgrade to the patched release, which includes both the recursion guard and comprehensive test coverage to prevent regressions. For users who cannot immediately upgrade, some mitigations are recommended. Ensure that evaluation environments cannot contain cyclic references, validate or sanitize externally supplied data structures before passing them to Expr, and/or wrap expression evaluation with panic recovery to prevent a full process crash (as a last-resort defensive measure). These workarounds reduce risk but do not fully eliminate the issue without the patch.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
49
EG Risk 49/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
36th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

December 16, 2025

Last Modified

October 13, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 6, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_pr, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Denial of Service via Unbounded Recursion in Builtin Functions · Advisory · expr-lang/expr · GitHub

https://github.com/expr-lang/expr/security/advisories/GHSA-cfpf-hrx2-8rv6
GitHub pull request Patch Available

fix(builtin): limit recursion depth

Patch available: expr-lang/expr v1.17.7 (PR #870 merged 2025-12-04)

https://github.com/expr-lang/expr/pull/870

Patch Availability(15)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhceph/grafana-rhel9:17775665462026-05-11redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-ml-pipelines-scheduledworkflow-v2-rhel8:17742822022026-03-25redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-model-controller-rhel9:17713782912026-03-04redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-model-registry-rhel9:17703262692026-02-12redhat
redhatrhacm2/acm-grafana-rhel9:17706322542026-02-11redhat
redhatcustom-metrics-autoscaler/custom-metrics-autoscaler-rhel9-operator:17700720202026-02-09redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-model-registry-rhel9:17702406482026-02-05redhat
redhatopenshift-gitops-1/argocd-rhel9:17688812282026-01-22redhat
redhatopenshift-gitops-1/argocd-rhel9:17688245322026-01-22redhat
redhatopentelemetry-collector-0:0.135.0-2.el9_42026-01-13redhat
redhatopentelemetry-collector-0:0.135.0-2.el9_62026-01-13redhat
redhatopentelemetry-collector-0:0.135.0-2.el10_02026-01-13redhat
redhatopentelemetry-collector-0:0.135.0-2.el9_72025-12-22redhat
redhatopentelemetry-collector-0:0.135.0-2.el10_12025-12-18redhat
gogithub.com/expr-lang/expr @ 1.17.7 (fixes < 1.17.7)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/expr-lang/expr—
  • every version up to 1.17.7: fixed in 1.17.7
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 203 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 104 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 08:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cfpf-hrx2-8rv6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  3. 2026-11-01 08:01 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  6. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  7. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  8. 2026-10-27 19:19 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-27 19:19 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  11. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  13. 2026-10-25 16:06 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  15. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  16. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  18. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  19. 2026-10-20 10:00 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-20 10:00 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  23. 2026-10-18 05:18 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  25. 2026-10-16 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  2. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  3. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  4. 2026-10-13 11:27 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-12 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  7. 2026-10-11 20:22 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 18:34 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 15:09 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  11. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  12. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  13. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  14. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  15. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  16. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  17. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  18. 2026-10-03 17:18 UTCOSV refresh
  19. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  20. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  21. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  22. 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  23. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  24. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  25. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  26. 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  27. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  28. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  29. 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  30. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  31. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  32. 2026-09-15 03:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  33. 2026-09-14 07:49 UTCOSV refresh
  34. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  35. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  36. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  37. 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  38. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  39. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  40. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  41. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  42. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  43. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  44. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  45. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  46. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  47. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  48. 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  49. 2026-08-26 08:43 UTCOSV refresh
  50. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  51. 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  52. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  53. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  54. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  55. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  56. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  57. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  58. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  59. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  60. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  61. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  62. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  63. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  64. 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  65. 2026-08-09 23:33 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-09 23:33 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  68. 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  69. 2026-08-08 06:18 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-08 06:18 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-07 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  72. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  73. 2026-08-06 08:49 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-06 08:49 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-68156?
CVE-2025-68156 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on December 16, 2025. Expr is an expression language and expression evaluation for Go. Prior to version 1.17.7, several builtin functions in Expr, including flatten, min, max, mean, and median, perform recursive traversal over user-provided data structures without enforcing a maximum recursion depth. If the evaluation…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-68156 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-68156 was published on December 16, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 13, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-68156 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-68156 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (36th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-68156?
CVE-2025-68156 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-68156?
A fix for CVE-2025-68156 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-68156 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-68156

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-68156?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.