CVE-2025-38472

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-07-28. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2025-22890 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-979q-6jjc-29jh (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix crash due to removal of uninitialised entry

A crash in conntrack was reported while trying to unlink the conntrack entry from the hash bucket list: [exception RIP: __nf_ct_delete_from_lists+172] [..] #7 [ff539b5a2b043aa0] nf_ct_delete at ffffffffc124d421 [nf_conntrack] #8 [ff539b5a2b043ad0] nf_ct_gc_expired at ffffffffc124d999 [nf_conntrack] #9 [ff539b5a2b043ae0] __nf_conntrack_find_get at ffffffffc124efbc [nf_conntrack] [..]

The nf_conn struct is marked as allocated from slab but appears to be in a partially initialised state:

ct hlist pointer is garbage; looks like the ct hash value (hence crash). ct->status is equal to IPS_CONFIRMED|IPS_DYING, which is expected ct->timeout is 30000 (=30s), which is unexpected.

Everything else looks like normal udp conntrack entry. If we ignore ct->status and pretend its 0, the entry matches those that are newly allocated but not yet inserted into the hash:

  • ct hlist pointers are overloaded and store/cache the raw tuple hash
  • ct->timeout matches the relative time expected for a new udp flow
rather than the absolute 'jiffies' value.

If it were not for the presence of IPS_CONFIRMED, __nf_conntrack_find_get() would have skipped the entry.

Theory is that we did hit following race:

cpu x cpu y cpu z found entry E found entry E E is expired nf_ct_delete() return E to rcu slab init_conntrack E is re-inited, ct->status set to 0 reply tuplehash hnnode.pprev stores hash value.

cpu y found E right before it was deleted on cpu x. E is now re-inited on cpu z. cpu y was preempted before checking for expiry and/or confirm bit.

->refcnt set to 1 E now owned by skb ->timeout set to 30000

If cpu y were to resume now, it would observe E as expired but would skip E due to missing CONFIRMED bit.

nf_conntrack_confirm gets called sets: ct->status |= CONFIRMED This is wrong: E is not yet added to hashtable.

cpu y resumes, it observes E as expired but CONFIRMED: nf_ct_expired() -> yes (ct->timeout is 30s) confirmed bit set.

cpu y will try to delete E from the hashtable: nf_ct_delete() -> set DYING bit __nf_ct_delete_from_lists

Even this scenario doesn't guarantee a crash: cpu z still holds the table bucket lock(s) so y blocks:

wait for spinlock held by z

CONFIRMED is set but there is no guarantee ct will be added to hash: "chaintoolong" or "clash resolution" logic both skip the insert step. reply hnnode.pprev still stores the hash value.

unlocks spinlock return NF_DROP

In case CPU z does insert the entry into the hashtable, cpu y will unlink E again right away but no crash occurs.

Without 'cpu y' race, 'garbage' hlist is of no consequence: ct refcnt remains at 1, eventually skb will be free'd and E gets destroyed via: nf_conntrack_put -> nf_conntrack_destroy -> nf_ct_destroy.

To resolve this, move the IPS_CONFIRMED assignment after the table insertion but before the unlock.

Pablo points out that the confirm-bit-store could be reordered to happen before hlist add resp. the timeout fixup, so switch to set_bit and before_atomic memory barrier to prevent this.

It doesn't matter if other CPUs can observe a newly inserted entry right before the CONFIRMED bit was set:

Such event cannot be distinguished from above "E is the old incarnation" case: the entry will be skipped.

Also change nf_ct_should_gc() to first check the confirmed bit.

The gc sequence is:

  • Check if entry has expired, if not skip to next entry
  • Obtain a reference to the expired entry.
  • Call nf_ct_should_gc() to double-check step 1.

nf_ct_should_gc() is thus called only for entries that already failed an expiry check. After this patch, once the confirmed bit check pas ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
40th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 28, 2025

Last Modified

October 15, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Aug 2, 2026
Patch available.
Web pageMentions a patch (unverified)

[SECURITY] [DLA 4328-1] linux-6.1 security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/10/msg00008.html
Web page

netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix crash due to removal of uninitialised entry - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fc38c249c622ff5e3011b8845fd49dbfd9289afc
Web page

netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix crash due to removal of uninitialised entry - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a47ef874189d47f934d0809ae738886307c0ea22
Web page

netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix crash due to removal of uninitialised entry - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/938ce0e8422d3793fe30df2ed0e37f6bc0598379
Web page

netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix crash due to removal of uninitialised entry - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/76179961c423cd698080b5e4d5583cf7f4fcdde9
Web page

netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix crash due to removal of uninitialised entry - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2d72afb340657f03f7261e9243b44457a9228ac7

Patch Availability(28)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1043.44) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1047.50+fips1) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-100.100~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gke-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1043.48) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-lowlatency-hwe-20.04-edge (6.8.0-100.100.1) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1046.49.1) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-edge (6.8.0-1044.44~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp (6.8.0.1023.24) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1046.52) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1046.52+fips1) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (6.8.0-1051.57~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.14.0-36.36) @ plucky2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-24.04-edge (6.14.0-1016.16~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-6.14 (6.14.0-1016.16) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (6.14.0-1017.17~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (6.14.0-1020.21~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-100.100) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-6.14 (6.14.0-1017.17) @ plucky2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-22.04 (6.8.1-1041.42~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (6.8.0-1047.50~22.04.2) @ jammy2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-6.8.1 (6.8.1-1041.42) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-100.100+fips1) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-427.92.1.el9_42025-10-02redhat
redhatkernel-rt-0:5.14.0-284.140.1.rt14.425.el9_22025-10-01redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-284.140.1.el9_22025-10-01redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-570.49.1.el9_62025-09-29redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-55.30.1.el10_02025-09-02redhat
linuxKernel @ 6.1.147 (fixes >=5.19.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.148-1~deb11u1 (11 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.153-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.153-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (41 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.147-1: fixed in 6.1.147-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1
  • every version up to 6.12.41-1: fixed in 6.12.41-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.16~rc7-1~exp1 (62 versions)
  • every version up to 6.16.3-1: fixed in 6.16.3-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(22)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 98 of 189 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 91 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  4. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  5. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  6. 2026-10-27 19:25 UTCOSV refresh
  7. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  8. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  12. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  13. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  14. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  15. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  16. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  17. 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  18. 2026-10-18 05:35 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  20. 2026-10-16 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  21. 2026-10-15 23:08 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-15 23:08 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-15 23:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-979q-6jjc-29jh · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  24. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  25. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
Show 73 more
  1. 2026-10-13 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 17:07 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-11 20:40 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 18:51 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 15:28 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 17:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  11. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  12. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  14. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  17. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  18. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  19. 2026-09-27 02:15 UTCOSV refresh
  20. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  21. 2026-09-26 00:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  22. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  23. 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  24. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  25. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  26. 2026-09-17 19:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  27. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  28. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  29. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  30. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  31. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  32. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  33. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  34. 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  35. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  36. 2026-09-07 11:48 UTCOSV refresh
  37. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  38. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  39. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  40. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  41. 2026-09-01 04:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  42. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  43. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  44. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  45. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  46. 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  47. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  48. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  49. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  50. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  51. 2026-08-20 20:31 UTCOSV refresh
  52. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  53. 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  54. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  55. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  56. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  57. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  58. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  59. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  60. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  61. 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  62. 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  63. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  64. 2026-08-05 13:02 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-05 13:02 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-05 13:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-979q-6jjc-29jh · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  67. 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  68. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  69. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  70. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  71. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  72. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  73. 2026-07-30 07:05 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-38472?
CVE-2025-38472 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 28, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix crash due to removal of uninitialised entry A crash in conntrack was reported while trying to unlink the conntrack entry from the hash bucket list: [exception RIP: __nf_ct_delete_from_lists+172] [..] #7…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-38472 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-38472 was published on July 28, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-38472 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-38472 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (40th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-38472?
CVE-2025-38472 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-38472?
A fix for CVE-2025-38472 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-38472 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-38472

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-38472?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.