CVE-2025-37821

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-05-08. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sched/eevdf: Fix se->slice being set to U64_MAX and resulting crash

There is a code path in dequeue_entities() that can set the slice of a sched_entity to U64_MAX, which sometimes results in a crash.

The offending case is when dequeue_entities() is called to dequeue a delayed group entity, and then the entity's parent's dequeue is delayed. In that case:

  • In the if (entity_is_task(se)) else block at the beginning of
dequeue_entities(), slice is set to cfs_rq_min_slice(group_cfs_rq(se)). If the entity was delayed, then it has no queued tasks, so cfs_rq_min_slice() returns U64_MAX.
  • The first for_each_sched_entity() loop dequeues the entity.
  • If the entity was its parent's only child, then the next iteration
tries to dequeue the parent.
  • If the parent's dequeue needs to be delayed, then it breaks from the
first for_each_sched_entity() loop _without updating slice_.
  • The second for_each_sched_entity() loop sets the parent's ->slice to
the saved slice, which is still U64_MAX.

This throws off subsequent calculations with potentially catastrophic results. A manifestation we saw in production was:

  • In update_entity_lag(), se->slice is used to calculate limit, which
ends up as a huge negative number.
  • limit is used in se->vlag = clamp(vlag, -limit, limit). Because limit
is negative, vlag > limit, so se->vlag is set to the same huge negative number.
  • In place_entity(), se->vlag is scaled, which overflows and results in
another huge (positive or negative) number.
  • The adjusted lag is subtracted from se->vruntime, which increases or
decreases se->vruntime by a huge number.
  • pick_eevdf() calls entity_eligible()/vruntime_eligible(), which
incorrectly returns false because the vruntime is so far from the other vruntimes on the queue, causing the (vruntime - cfs_rq->min_vruntime) * load calulation to overflow.
  • Nothing appears to be eligible, so pick_eevdf() returns NULL.
  • pick_next_entity() tries to dereference the return value of
pick_eevdf() and crashes.

Dumping the cfs_rq states from the core dumps with drgn showed tell-tale huge vruntime ranges and bogus vlag values, and I also traced se->slice being set to U64_MAX on live systems (which was usually "benign" since the rest of the runqueue needed to be in a particular state to crash).

Fix it in dequeue_entities() by always setting slice from the first non-empty cfs_rq.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
EPSS
4.9%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 8, 2025

Last Modified

November 12, 2025

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-37821(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.14.0-22.22) @ plucky2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure (6.14.0-1007.7) @ plucky2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-64k (6.14.0-1007.7) @ plucky2026-05-30ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-124.8.1.el10_12025-11-11redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(3)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 48× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-07 02:21 UTCOSV refresh
Show 62 more
  1. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-18 13:13 UTCOSV refresh
  33. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-30 05:54 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-05-30 05:54 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-05-30 05:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-37821?
CVE-2025-37821 is a medium vulnerability published on May 8, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/eevdf: Fix se->slice being set to U64_MAX and resulting crash There is a code path in dequeue_entities() that can set the slice of a schedentity to U64MAX, which sometimes results in a crash. The offending case is when…
When was CVE-2025-37821 disclosed?
CVE-2025-37821 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 8, 2025, with the most recent update on November 12, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-37821 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-37821 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 4.9% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-37821?
CVE-2025-37821 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-37821?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-37821, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-37821

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-37821?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.