CVE-2024-50099

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-11-05. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2024-44574 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-pj67-hxcx-g74v (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

arm64: probes: Remove broken LDR (literal) uprobe support

The simulate_ldr_literal() and simulate_ldrsw_literal() functions are unsafe to use for uprobes. Both functions were originally written for use with kprobes, and access memory with plain C accesses. When uprobes was added, these were reused unmodified even though they cannot safely access user memory.

There are three key problems:

1) The plain C accesses do not have corresponding extable entries, and thus if they encounter a fault the kernel will treat these as unintentional accesses to user memory, resulting in a BUG() which will kill the kernel thread, and likely lead to further issues (e.g. lockup or panic()).

2) The plain C accesses are subject to HW PAN and SW PAN, and so when either is in use, any attempt to simulate an access to user memory will fault. Thus neither simulate_ldr_literal() nor simulate_ldrsw_literal() can do anything useful when simulating a user instruction on any system with HW PAN or SW PAN.

3) The plain C accesses are privileged, as they run in kernel context, and in practice can access a small range of kernel virtual addresses. The instructions they simulate have a range of +/-1MiB, and since the simulated instructions must itself be a user instructions in the TTBR0 address range, these can address the final 1MiB of the TTBR1 acddress range by wrapping downwards from an address in the first 1MiB of the TTBR0 address range.

In contemporary kernels the last 8MiB of TTBR1 address range is reserved, and accesses to this will always fault, meaning this is no worse than (1).

Historically, it was theoretically possible for the linear map or vmemmap to spill into the final 8MiB of the TTBR1 address range, but in practice this is extremely unlikely to occur as this would require either:

* Having enough physical memory to fill the entire linear map all the way to the final 1MiB of the TTBR1 address range.

* Getting unlucky with KASLR randomization of the linear map such that the populated region happens to overlap with the last 1MiB of the TTBR address range.

... and in either case if we were to spill into the final page there would be larger problems as the final page would alias with error pointers.

Practically speaking, (1) and (2) are the big issues. Given there have been no reports of problems since the broken code was introduced, it appears that no-one is relying on probing these instructions with uprobes.

Avoid these issues by not allowing uprobes on LDR (literal) and LDRSW (literal), limiting the use of simulate_ldr_literal() and simulate_ldrsw_literal() to kprobes. Attempts to place uprobes on LDR (literal) and LDRSW (literal) will be rejected as arm_probe_decode_insn() will return INSN_REJECTED. In future we can consider introducing working uprobes support for these instructions, but this will require more significant work.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
19th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 5, 2024

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Patch Availability(31)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.134.145~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-kvm (5.4.0.1127.123) @ focal2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1025.30) @ noble2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1022.22) @ noble2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-24.04a (6.8.0-1024.24) @ noble2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-24.04 (6.8.1-1018.19) @ noble2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-kvm (5.15.0.1076.72) @ jammy2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt (5.15.0.1033.33) @ jammy2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-host (5.15.0-1044.48) @ jammy2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1075.71) @ jammy2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (5.15.0.1075.81~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-5.4.0-1058 (5.4.0-1058.62) @ focal2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.133.132) @ jammy2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-lts-20.04 (5.4.0.1143.145) @ focal2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-nolpae (5.15.0.1072.70) @ jammy2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-lowlatency-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.133.143~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gke-5.15 (5.15.0.1075.74) @ jammy2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm (5.15.0.1070.66) @ jammy2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-18.04-edge (5.4.0.208.204) @ focal2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1078.80) @ jammy2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-intel-iotg (5.15.0.1073.73) @ jammy2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-20.04 (5.4.0.1138.131) @ focal2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-lts-20.04 (5.4.0.1086.115) @ focal2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-24.04b (6.11.0-1015.15) @ noble2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-fips (5.4.0.1116.113) @ focal2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-nvidia (6.8.0-1014.15) @ noble2026-10-24ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-427.57.1.el9_42025-03-05redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-503.19.1.el9_52024-12-19redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-553.32.1.el8_102024-12-11redhat
redhatkernel-rt-0:4.18.0-553.32.1.rt7.373.el8_102024-12-11redhat
linuxKernel @ 4.19.323 (fixes >=4.10.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (44 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.234-1: fixed in 5.10.234-1
—
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1, 6.1.106-3~deb11u2, 6.1.106-3~deb11u3, 6.1.112-1~deb11u1
  • every version up to 6.1.119-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.119-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (30 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.115-1: fixed in 6.1.115-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.11.5-1: fixed in 6.11.5-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.11.5-1: fixed in 6.11.5-1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(20)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 94 of 216 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 6 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 122 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  3. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  5. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  6. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  7. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  8. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  11. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  12. 2026-10-24 04:13 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 04:13 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-24 04:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pj67-hxcx-g74v · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  15. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  16. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  18. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  19. 2026-10-19 17:25 UTCOSV refresh
  20. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 06:55 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-17 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  24. 2026-10-16 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  25. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
Show 69 more
  1. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 17:41 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  5. 2026-10-11 21:07 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 15:59 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  11. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  12. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  13. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  14. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  15. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  16. 2026-10-02 16:15 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  18. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  19. 2026-09-29 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  20. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  21. 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  22. 2026-09-26 22:41 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  24. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  25. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  26. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  27. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  28. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  29. 2026-09-17 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  30. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  31. 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  32. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  33. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  34. 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  35. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  36. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  37. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  38. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  39. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  40. 2026-09-07 08:18 UTCOSV refresh
  41. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  42. 2026-09-04 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  43. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  44. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  45. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  46. 2026-09-01 04:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  47. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  48. 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  49. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  50. 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  51. 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  52. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  53. 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  54. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  55. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  56. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  57. 2026-08-20 18:01 UTCOSV refresh
  58. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  59. 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  60. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  61. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  62. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  63. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  64. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  65. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  66. 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  67. 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  68. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  69. 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-50099?
CVE-2024-50099 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 5, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: arm64: probes: Remove broken LDR (literal) uprobe support The simulate_ldr_literal() and simulate_ldrsw_literal() functions are unsafe to use for uprobes. Both functions were originally written for use with kprobes, and access…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-50099 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-50099 was published on November 5, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-50099 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-50099 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (19th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-50099?
CVE-2024-50099 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-50099?
A fix for CVE-2024-50099 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2024-50099 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-50099

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-50099?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.