CVE-2024-50082

MEDIUMNVD 4.74.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 4.7 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-10-29. NVD baseline CVSS 4.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2024-44719 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-58q9-jhx4-mj9p (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

4.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 4.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

blk-rq-qos: fix crash on rq_qos_wait vs. rq_qos_wake_function race

We're seeing crashes from rq_qos_wake_function that look like this:

BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffafe180a40084 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 100000067 P4D 100000067 PUD 10027c067 PMD 10115d067 PTE 0 Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 17 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/17 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-00013-geca631b8fe80 #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1d/0x40 Code: 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 9c 41 5c fa 65 ff 05 62 97 30 4c 31 c0 ba 01 00 00 00 0f b1 17 75 0a 4c 89 e0 41 5c c3 cc cc cc cc 89 c6 e8 2c 0b 00 RSP: 0018:ffffafe180580ca0 EFLAGS: 00010046 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffafe180a3f7a8 RCX: 0000000000000011 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI: ffffafe180a40084 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00000000001e7240 R09: 0000000000000011 R10: 0000000000000028 R11: 0000000000000888 R12: 0000000000000002 R13: ffffafe180a40084 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000003 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9aaf1f280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffafe180a40084 CR3: 000000010e428002 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: try_to_wake_up+0x5a/0x6a0 rq_qos_wake_function+0x71/0x80 __wake_up_common+0x75/0xa0 __wake_up+0x36/0x60 scale_up.part.0+0x50/0x110 wb_timer_fn+0x227/0x450 ...

So rq_qos_wake_function() calls wake_up_process(data->task), which calls try_to_wake_up(), which faults in raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock).

p comes from data->task, and data comes from the waitqueue entry, which is stored on the waiter's stack in rq_qos_wait(). Analyzing the core dump with drgn, I found that the waiter had already woken up and moved on to a completely unrelated code path, clobbering what was previously data->task. Meanwhile, the waker was passing the clobbered garbage in data->task to wake_up_process(), leading to the crash.

What's happening is that in between rq_qos_wake_function() deleting the waitqueue entry and calling wake_up_process(), rq_qos_wait() is finding that it already got a token and returning. The race looks like this:

rq_qos_wait() rq_qos_wake_function() ============================================================== prepare_to_wait_exclusive() data->got_token = true; list_del_init(&curr->entry); if (data.got_token) break; finish_wait(&rqw->wait, &data.wq); ^- returns immediately because list_empty_careful(&wq_entry->entry) is true ... return, go do something else ... wake_up_process(data->task) (NO LONGER VALID!)-^

Normally, finish_wait() is supposed to synchronize against the waker. But, as noted above, it is returning immediately because the waitqueue entry has already been removed from the waitqueue.

The bug is that rq_qos_wake_function() is accessing the waitqueue entry AFTER deleting it. Note that autoremove_wake_function() wakes the waiter and THEN deletes the waitqueue entry, which is the proper order.

Fix it by swapping the order. We also need to use list_del_init_careful() to match the list_empty_careful() in finish_wait().

CVSS v3
4.7
EG Score
4.7MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
21
EG Risk 21/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity47% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
13th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (4.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
4.7 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 29, 2024

Last Modified

October 15, 2026

Patch Availability(31)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-kvm (5.4.0.1127.123) @ focal2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1078.80) @ jammy2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-5.4.0-1058 (5.4.0-1058.62) @ focal2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-20.04 (5.4.0.1138.131) @ focal2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-nolpae (5.15.0.1072.70) @ jammy2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-18.04-edge (5.4.0.208.204) @ focal2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-24.04b (6.11.0-1015.15) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-edge (5.4.0.1142.152~18.04.1) @ bionic2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-57.59~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1022.22) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1025.30) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (6.8.0-1025.30~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt (5.15.0.1033.33) @ jammy2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime (6.8.0-2023.24) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-nvidia (6.8.0-1014.15) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-edge (5.15.0.1074.77~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi (6.8.0-1028.32) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi2-hwe-18.04-edge (5.4.0.1129.160) @ focal2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-hwe-18.04-edge (5.4.0.1129.142~18.04.1) @ bionic2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-18.18) @ oracular2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-1005.5) @ oracular2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-lts-20.04 (5.4.0.1143.145) @ focal2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.133.132) @ jammy2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-host (5.15.0-1044.48) @ jammy2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-edge (6.8.0-1027.29~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1075.71) @ jammy2026-10-15ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-427.79.1.el9_42025-07-28redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-570.12.1.el9_62025-05-13redhat
redhatkernel-rt-0:4.18.0-553.32.1.rt7.373.el8_102024-12-11redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-553.32.1.el8_102024-12-11redhat
linuxKernel @ 5.4.285 (fixes >=4.19.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (44 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.234-1: fixed in 5.10.234-1
—
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1, 6.1.106-3~deb11u2, 6.1.106-3~deb11u3, 6.1.112-1~deb11u1
  • every version up to 6.1.119-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.119-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (30 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.115-1: fixed in 6.1.115-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.11.5-1: fixed in 6.11.5-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.11.5-1: fixed in 6.11.5-1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(20)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 94 of 218 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 6 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 124 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  3. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  5. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  6. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  7. 2026-10-27 19:55 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  9. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  12. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  13. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  14. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  15. 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  16. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  17. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  18. 2026-10-18 06:55 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-17 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  20. 2026-10-16 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  21. 2026-10-15 23:11 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-15 23:11 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-15 23:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-58q9-jhx4-mj9p · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  24. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  25. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
Show 69 more
  1. 2026-10-13 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 17:41 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  4. 2026-10-11 21:07 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 15:59 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  7. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  8. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  9. 2026-10-08 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  10. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  11. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  12. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  13. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  14. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  15. 2026-10-02 16:15 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  17. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  18. 2026-09-29 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  19. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  20. 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  21. 2026-09-26 22:42 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  23. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  24. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  25. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  26. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  27. 2026-09-19 15:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  28. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  29. 2026-09-17 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  30. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  31. 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  32. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  33. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  34. 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  35. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  36. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  37. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  38. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  39. 2026-09-07 08:47 UTCOSV refresh
  40. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  41. 2026-09-04 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  42. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  43. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  44. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  45. 2026-09-01 04:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  46. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  47. 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  48. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  49. 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  50. 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  51. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  52. 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  53. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  54. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  55. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  56. 2026-08-20 18:01 UTCOSV refresh
  57. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  58. 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  59. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  60. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  61. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  62. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  63. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  64. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  65. 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  66. 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  67. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  68. 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  69. 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-50082?
CVE-2024-50082 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 29, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: blk-rq-qos: fix crash on rq_qos_wait vs. rq_qos_wake_function race We're seeing crashes from rq_qos_wake_function that look like this: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffafe180a40084 #PF: supervisor write access in…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-50082 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-50082 was published on October 29, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-50082 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-50082 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (13th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-50082?
CVE-2024-50082 has a CVSS v3 base score of 4.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-50082?
A fix for CVE-2024-50082 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2024-50082 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-50082

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-50082?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.