CVE-2024-49112

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2024-12-12. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekWeaponized

Also known asEUVD-2024-43797 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 72%
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 72%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Windows Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
88
EG Risk 88/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation72% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
72%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
72% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

December 12, 2024

Last Modified

January 14, 2025

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Oct 10, 2026
Patch available. Sources: microsoft.
MicrosoftMentions a patch (unverified)

Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center

https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2024-49112

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-49112(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 22× in last 7d / 77× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 98 of 187 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 89 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 04:54 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 04:54 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 04:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-01 06:04 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-11-01 06:04 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-01 06:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  8. 2026-10-31 07:12 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-31 07:12 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-31 07:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  12. 2026-10-30 08:18 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-30 08:18 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-30 08:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-29 09:28 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-29 09:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-10-28 10:36 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-28 10:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  21. 2026-10-27 10:54 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-27 10:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  24. 2026-10-26 12:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-10-25 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
Show 73 more
  1. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  2. 2026-10-25 13:09 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-25 13:09 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-25 13:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  5. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  6. 2026-10-24 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-24 14:17 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-24 14:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  10. 2026-10-23 15:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-10-21 16:37 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-21 16:37 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-21 16:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  17. 2026-10-20 17:46 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-20 17:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  20. 2026-10-19 18:54 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-19 18:54 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-19 18:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  24. 2026-10-18 19:59 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-18 19:59 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-18 19:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-10-18 06:56 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-10-17 21:07 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-17 21:07 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-17 21:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  31. 2026-10-16 22:14 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-10-16 22:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  33. 2026-10-16 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  34. 2026-10-15 18:51 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-10-15 18:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  36. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  37. 2026-10-14 12:31 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-10-14 12:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  39. 2026-10-13 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  40. 2026-10-13 12:24 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-13 12:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  42. 2026-10-12 17:42 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-10-12 13:27 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-12 13:27 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-12 13:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ffx5-3pxp-6q4w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  46. 2026-10-11 21:08 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-10-11 16:00 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  49. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  50. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  51. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  52. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  53. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  54. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  55. 2026-09-30 19:55 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  57. 2026-09-29 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  58. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  59. 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  60. 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  61. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  62. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  63. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  64. 2026-09-19 15:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  65. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  66. 2026-09-17 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  67. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 72% · 99th percentile
  68. 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
  69. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
  70. 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
  71. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
  72. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
  73. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(3 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (3 GitHub PoCs). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • GitHub PoCbo0l3an/CVE-2024-49112-PoC
    Published Jan 8, 2025

    CVE-2024-49112 LDAP RCE PoC and Metasploit Module

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCCCIEVoice2009/CVE-2024-49112
    Published Jan 2, 2025
    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCtnkr/poc_monitor
    Published Dec 16, 2024

    A short scraper looking for a POC of CVE-2024-49112

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-49112?
CVE-2024-49112 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on December 12, 2024. Windows Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
When was CVE-2024-49112 made public?
CVE-2024-49112 was made public on December 10, 2024: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Microsoft Corporation, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on December 12, 2024. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of January 14, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-49112 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-49112 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model places it in Tier 2 (Weaponized), which is not evidence of exploitation: CISA's SSVC data says a public PoC exists and its EPSS is 50% or more. EchelonGraph does not test whether exploit code works. FIRST EPSS estimates a 72% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-49112?
CVE-2024-49112 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-49112?
A fix for CVE-2024-49112 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2024-49112 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-49112

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-49112?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.