GStreamer is a library for constructing graphs of media-handling components. An integer underflow has been detected in the function qtdemux_parse_theora_extension within qtdemux.c. The vulnerability occurs due to an underflow of the gint size variable, which causes size to hold a large unintended value when cast to an unsigned integer. This 32-bit negative value is then cast to a 64-bit unsigned integer (0xfffffffffffffffa) in a subsequent call to gst_buffer_new_and_alloc. The function gst_buffer_new_allocate then attempts to allocate memory, eventually calling _sysmem_new_block. The function _sysmem_new_block adds alignment and header size to the (unsigned) size, causing the overflow of the 'slice_size' variable. As a result, only 0x89 bytes are allocated, despite the large input size. When the following memcpy call occurs in gst_buffer_fill, the data from the input file will overwrite the content of the GstMapInfo info structure. Finally, during the call to gst_memory_unmap, the overwritten memory may cause a function pointer hijack, as the mem->allocator->mem_unmap_full function is called with a corrupted pointer. This function pointer overwrite could allow an attacker to alter the execution flow of the program, leading to arbitrary code execution. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.24.10.
CVE-2024-47606
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 1.7% (77th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2024-42823 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 45EG Risk 45/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation1.7% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 1.7%
- EPSS %ILE
- 77th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 1.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
December 12, 2024
Last Modified
March 17, 2026
Advisory Details (6)
Auto-updated Oct 9, 2026[SECURITY] [DLA 4071-1] gst-plugins-good1.0 security update
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/02/msg00035.html[SECURITY] [DLA 3994-1] gstreamer1.0 security update
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/12/msg00016.htmlGHSL-2024-166: Integer underflow in qtdemux_parse_theora_extension leading to function pointer overwrite in GStreamer - CVE-2024-47606 | GitHub Security Lab
https://securitylab.github.com/advisories/GHSL-2024-166_Gstreamer/Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-47606(12)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2025:3847Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenJDK 8u452 Windows Security Update
- RHSA-2025:3846Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenJDK 8u452 Security Update for Portable Linux Builds
- RHSA-2024:11348Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: gstreamer1-plugins-good security update
- RHSA-2024:11346Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: gstreamer1-plugins-good security update
- RHSA-2024:11344Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: gstreamer1-plugins-base and gstreamer1-plugins-good security update
- RHSA-2024:11149Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: gstreamer1-plugins-good security update
- RHSA-2024:11148Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: gstreamer1-plugins-good security update
- RHSA-2024:11299Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: gstreamer1-plugins-good security update
- +4 more
Patch Availability(14)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | libgstreamer1.0-dev (1.24.8-1ubuntu0.1) @ oracular | 2026-11-02 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | libgstreamer-plugins-good1.0-dev (1.16.3-0ubuntu1.3) @ focal | 2026-11-02 | ubuntu |
| redhat | patch | 2025-04-16 | redhat |
| redhat | patch | 2025-04-16 | redhat |
| redhat | gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.10.4-3.el7_9 | 2024-12-18 | redhat |
| redhat | gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-3.el8_6 | 2024-12-18 | redhat |
| redhat | gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-4.el8_8 | 2024-12-18 | redhat |
| redhat | gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-2.el8_2 | 2024-12-18 | redhat |
| redhat | gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-3.el8_4 | 2024-12-18 | redhat |
| redhat | gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.18.4-6.el9_0 | 2024-12-17 | redhat |
| redhat | gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-5.el8_10 | 2024-12-17 | redhat |
| redhat | gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.22.1-3.el9_5 | 2024-12-16 | redhat |
| redhat | gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.22.1-3.el9_4 | 2024-12-16 | redhat |
| redhat | gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.18.4-7.el9_2 | 2024-12-16 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(8 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| gst-plugins-good1.0 | 1.18.4-2, 1.18.4-2+deb11u1, 1.18.4-2+deb11u2 |
| — |
| gstreamer1.0 | 1.18.4-2.1 |
| — |
Debian:12(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| gst-plugins-good1.0 | 1.22.0-5, 1.22.0-5+deb12u1 |
| — |
| gstreamer1.0 | 1.22.0-2 |
| — |
Debian:13(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| gst-plugins-good1.0 | — |
| — |
| gstreamer1.0 | — |
| — |
Debian:14(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| gst-plugins-good1.0 | — |
| — |
| gstreamer1.0 | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(2)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 75× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 97 of 251 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 3 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 154 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 00:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 00:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-01 01:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 01:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-31 03:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 03:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-30 04:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 04:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-29 05:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 05:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-28 07:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 07:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-27 08:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 08:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-26 08:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 17:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-25 09:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 09:37 UTCVendor advisory
Show 72 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-24 11:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 11:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-23 12:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 12:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-22 13:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 13:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-21 15:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 16:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-19 17:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 17:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-18 19:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 19:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-18 06:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 20:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 20:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-17 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-16 22:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 22:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-15 18:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 18:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-14 12:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 12:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-10-13 12:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 17:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-10-12 13:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 21:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-10-10 06:33 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-09-30 19:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-09-20 15:44 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-19 15:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 69th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 69th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:11:gstreamer1.0 · Debian:11:gst-plugins-good1.0
- CVE-2017-5838EG 7.5EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2024-47613EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2024-47540EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2024-47539EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2024-47537EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-9636EG 9.8EPSS p95CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-9635EG 9.8EPSS p95CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-9634EG 9.8EPSS p95CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-46470EG 9.1CRITICAL
- CVE-2024-47834EG 9.1CRITICAL
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2024:11119 · redhat:RHSA-2025:3846 · redhat:RHSA-2024:11344
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2024-47606?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-47606 published?
Is CVE-2024-47606 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-47606?
How do I remediate CVE-2024-47606?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-47606
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-47606?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.